Register now to get rid of these ads!

Technical How much room between body and rear axel

Discussion in 'The Hokey Ass Message Board' started by Topolino Kid, Mar 24, 2021.

  1. How much Clearance between body and rear Axel? For street rod??
     
  2. Bandit Billy
    Joined: Sep 16, 2014
    Posts: 12,373

    Bandit Billy
    ALLIANCE MEMBER

    a hole? :eek:
     
  3. I like enough room where the tires don't rub and that varies on most cars.

    I want at least a inch where the tire is closest to the body, there may be more room were the body meets the frame. HRP
     
  4. Moriarity
    Joined: Apr 11, 2001
    Posts: 31,159

    Moriarity
    SUPER MODERATOR
    Staff Member

    "street rod"? thems fighting words.....
     

  5. street rods don't need much clearance, don't get driven much or are trailered to fairgrounds !!!
     
  6. rusty valley
    Joined: Oct 25, 2014
    Posts: 3,885

    rusty valley
    Member

    So, he meant to say, clearance to the trailer fenders?
     
  7. lostone
    Joined: Oct 13, 2013
    Posts: 2,877

    lostone
    Member
    from kansas

    I bottom out the suspension where the rear axle is totally against the bump stop then allow about 1" to body.

    This allows for any brake flex hose or anything else that might get in the way alittle bit of room.
     
  8. Ya ok...ain't no Fuckin newbee...built this steel Topolino before some here where members..
    1404094649658.jpg
    20141005_133513.jpg Message_1570396667906-1.jpg
    There is plenty of room on my fiat build..
    But very little room on my American Bantam as it already has a very high wheel opening
    Message_1615765101017.jpg
     

    Attached Files:

  9. grumpy65
    Joined: Dec 19, 2017
    Posts: 920

    grumpy65

    @Topolino Kid
    What exactly are you asking..........? You say 'body and rear axle'.
    Axle to frame rail clearance for suspension travel?
    Axle/pumpkin clearance to floor?
    Tire sidewall to body horizontally?
    Tire tread to fender/body lip clearance vertically?

    Better question............better answers..............
     
    Tim and jetnow1 like this.
  10. Rear axel to frame clearance for street driving..not racing..
     
    kidcampbell71 likes this.
  11. alchemy
    Joined: Sep 27, 2002
    Posts: 20,522

    alchemy
    Member

    At least three inches for comfort. And stiff enough springs that will really work, not collapse.
     
  12. Thanks...been a good while since I've been here to the Hamb...
    This Bantam is a tricky build..without cutting it too hell n back..i guess this issue is why most have super sized tires on the rear lol
     
    kidcampbell71 likes this.
  13. 1971BB427
    Joined: Mar 6, 2010
    Posts: 8,765

    1971BB427
    Member
    from Oregon

    I like close clearances between body and tires, but more between axle and frame, or differential and trunk pan. So I use somewhat firm springs, whether they're leaf or coilovers. And I use poly bump stops mounted above the axle on the frame rails to stop the axle before the tires contact the body.
    Both of my cars have about 1.5" clearance from body to tires, but twice that between frame and axle. But the bump stops can compress a little, so they're adjusted to stop anything from making contact.

    [​IMG]
     
    kidcampbell71 likes this.
  14. I don't understand how 3 inches of rearend travel doesn't keep the body of the tires with just 1 1/2 inches of tire clearance????
     
  15. I did move it all around today..3 1/4 " of frame to axel clearance..threw a tire on rim n bolted it on..need to drop body a bit close closet to frame received_2885967271649293.jpeg
     
    nosford and kidcampbell71 like this.
  16. grumpy65
    Joined: Dec 19, 2017
    Posts: 920

    grumpy65

    Read it again. He has 3" of clearance between axle and frame, but the actual travel is limited to less than 1.5" by a combination of firm springs and the bump stops.
     
  17. flatheadgary
    Joined: Jul 17, 2007
    Posts: 1,014

    flatheadgary
    Member
    from boron,ca

    if you want the body down lower you would need to channel it more. you may need to cut the floor so it doesn't hit the axle. or you could make a bigger z in the frame or a c notch to get back the clearance. either way you may need to cut the floor out.
     
  18. I'm installing new floor pans last couple of days..no..not changing or notching...logically it doesn't make sense to have 3 inches of clearance between frame n axel housing if you're going to limit travel with bump stops to save tires from rubbing..why bother???
    Ever have a suspension fail and body land on tire???i did when my 69 Camaro was side swipped..busted shock...sheared locator for leaf spring..rearend slide backwards..breaking shackle..bammm
    Body riding on 14" m-60 tire...rear of Camaro went hard left...totally fucked up shit...
    .
     
  19. Rusty O'Toole
    Joined: Sep 17, 2006
    Posts: 9,659

    Rusty O'Toole
    Member

    A stock fifties car typically had 9" of suspension travel. With the car at rest, empty, about 5" of clearance, loaded 3" or 4". It was common to use 2" lowering blocks in back, this was ok if you did not have a full load of passengers and baggage. Rubber bump stops about 2" to 3" thick and they will squash an inch or 2, preventing the axle from clanging against the frame.
    I wouldn't go less than 3" with the bump stops cut in half even on a coupe with no back seat that will not carry heavy loads.
     

Share This Page

Register now to get rid of these ads!

Archive

Copyright © 1995-2021 The Jalopy Journal: Steal our stuff, we'll kick your teeth in. Terms of Service. Privacy Policy.

Atomic Industry
Forum software by XenForo™ ©2010-2014 XenForo Ltd.