Register now to get rid of these ads!

Projects 1917/1928/1938 American Lafrance Plymouth V12 Speedster

Discussion in 'The Hokey Ass Message Board' started by animal8324, Nov 17, 2020.

  1. getow
    Joined: May 9, 2016
    Posts: 305

    getow
    Member

    Way cool. I will be following as many others. I get a kick out of that 100 yr old speedster stuff. Did you have todo any math on rear diff gearing as opposed to sprockets, tire hieght? Im sure it matters somehow?
     
    chryslerfan55 and Thor1 like this.
  2. animal8324
    Joined: Sep 28, 2012
    Posts: 136

    animal8324
    Member
    from nj

    Yup i'll have to sit down and do some math to figure out exactly which sprocket ill go with.
    It's kind of a bitch to figure out because there isnt an engine RPM to transmission gear to rear diff ratio to sprockets to rear wheel rpm/speed calculator lol
     
  3. getow
    Joined: May 9, 2016
    Posts: 305

    getow
    Member

    Yea thats what i was thinking too lol
     
    chryslerfan55 likes this.
  4. gatz
    Joined: Jun 2, 2011
    Posts: 1,828

    gatz
    Member

    The math shouldn't be too difficult, just take it a step at a time. Sketching the components and locations helps alot.
    If you need a sprocket outline designed, I might be able to do it and save it as a dxf.
    (I've done large non-commercial #40 i.g 216; the principles are the same for other tooth profiles)
    You could then have it water-jet cut out of whatever material.

    But, it would be more economical to buy commercial sprockets.

    BTW, your chain(s) will be flopping a bit due to the front spring perch not being coincident with the rear axle shaft center........ you probably already knew that.
     
    SS327, Stogy, chryslerfan55 and 2 others like this.
  5. animal8324
    Joined: Sep 28, 2012
    Posts: 136

    animal8324
    Member
    from nj

    I did not know that. I dont know what you mean by coincident. Please explain more.
     
  6. gatz
    Joined: Jun 2, 2011
    Posts: 1,828

    gatz
    Member

    By "rear axle shaft" I mean the shortened differential that is bolted into the notched frame so that you don't have to put a drive shaft in there; as you've explained.
    The issue is that the distance A, (chain) in this crude sketch will shorten when the driven axle pivots about the forward spring perch bolt.
    C is constant as built. Length of C is what I was referring to when I said "the front spring perch not being coincident with the rear axle shaft center"

    B lengthens slightly as the spring is subjected to more load, as it has a tendency to straighten the curve of the spring, however this will not be the same amount as what happens to A.

    If the chain length is made to fit when the vehicle is at rest,
    it will slacken because of a change in A to A1 as a load is applied or the drive axle is displaced vertically.
    You can check this easily by taking out the spring shackles at the rear (differential supported)
    and measure A as you move the differential up/down.

    It may be that it's not enough to worry about, but the change in A to A1 will def be there.
    HAMB Animal8326 Chain Drive.jpg
     
    Last edited: Dec 18, 2020
  7. khead47
    Joined: Mar 29, 2010
    Posts: 1,789

    khead47
    Member

    I had a Ruttman Mini Bike as a kid. Hot Rod West Bend engine. Was cruising at about 35 mph when the chain broke. Still have the scar. Just saying.
     
  8. ratrodrodder
    Joined: Feb 19, 2008
    Posts: 390

    ratrodrodder
    Member
    from Boston

    So the chain drives used on Mack Bulldogs and similar age vehicles (1920s and earlier, at least) had slack in them, but they were also using springs with a relatively high load rating. Maybe 1-2" of slack? Anyways, if the chain would break under load, they would usually just lay down in the road after going over the drive sprocket. Similar to a tank tread coming off. And because of the slack, they aren't under the tension that a bicycle (or mini bike) chain might be under.

    I don't think a chain "snapping" and causing injury is of much concern here, but I reserve the right to be wrong. :p
     
    48fordnut, Stogy, williebill and 3 others like this.
  9. animal8324
    Joined: Sep 28, 2012
    Posts: 136

    animal8324
    Member
    from nj

    Thanks for the explanation Gatz.
    If it's to much for my liking I'll put sprung idler in.
     
    48fordnut, Stogy, 1947knuck and 3 others like this.
  10. khead47
    Joined: Mar 29, 2010
    Posts: 1,789

    khead47
    Member

    Just don't lose your head.
     
    Stogy, Thor1 and loudbang like this.
  11. redzula
    Joined: Jul 6, 2011
    Posts: 1,227

    redzula
    Member

    This is a similar concept to ladder bars/rear trailing arms needing to be mounted as close as possible to trans output yoke correct? Except the obvious difference of this case the chain gets slack or tighter, and the ladder bar example the driveshaft would slide in or out on the slip yoke.

    Just trying to understand the science in my head.
    -Adam

    Sent from my rotary phone using The H.A.M.B. mobile app
     
  12. gatz
    Joined: Jun 2, 2011
    Posts: 1,828

    gatz
    Member

    The Mack Bulldog trucks that used the chain drive had an adjustable strut with a circular mount that pivoted about the primary drive axle, so slack could be kept to a minimum, This eliminated the C factor as well as any change in B in the sketch posted. "A" then being the constant once this adjustment was made.

    Mack Truck Chain Drive_2.jpg


    I remember assembling a Bulldog model kit as a youngster and giving it to my Grand-dad.
    Also gave him a Bulldog hood ornament, which I inherited and still have.
    The chain drive was an interesting, but non-functioning detail of the kit's design.

    I would suggest that the OP still consider the effect as mentioned in previous post.
    A sprung idler on the slack (lower) side may work.

    Check out this type of tensioner....

    https://www.lovejoy-inc.com/products/runright-rubber-suspension/

    there are other brands of the same.

    gatz
     
    VANDENPLAS, Jet96, Baumi and 6 others like this.
  13. Fabber McGee
    Joined: Nov 22, 2013
    Posts: 1,287

    Fabber McGee
    Member

    Cool project, it's fun to build something that uses nothing from a catalog, huh?
    I have my dad's big old pre war Jeager cement mixer. The bowl is driven with a big roller chain that has about an inch and a quarter between pins. When the original chain tensioner sprocket bearings failed during a pour he quick like cut a chunk of oak 2 x 4 about 6 inches long, cut a curve on the side that rides on the chain with a chainsaw and drilled a hole for the shaft to go through. We were back to work in about 20 minutes and that oak block has been in there doing it's job for 50 years. No wear is evident except a couple little grooves where the side rails of the chain wore in. Once the rollers hit the wood it hasn't changed.
    I said all that to plant the idea in your head that hardwood is period correct and would (wood) look cool in my opinion. Easy to build a short swinging arm with a hood spring for tensioning on the bottom/slack side.
    Subscribed.
     
  14. Fabber McGee
    Joined: Nov 22, 2013
    Posts: 1,287

    Fabber McGee
    Member

    Just thought I'd add an opinion (even though nobody gives a damn), I really do prefer your choice of body less speedster like old 999 to the boat tails.
     
    Stogy, loudbang and Thor1 like this.
  15. animal8324
    Joined: Sep 28, 2012
    Posts: 136

    animal8324
    Member
    from nj

    Thats bad ass Fabber McGee.
     
  16. animal8324
    Joined: Sep 28, 2012
    Posts: 136

    animal8324
    Member
    from nj

    I decided to test fire the engineyesterday for shits and giggles and it seemed to only be running on the left bank of cylinders. TodayI investigated more and discovered some stuck Valves the old school way.
    WITH GREAT BALLS OF FIRE!!
    I started working them back and forth andhope they free up. Ifnot it's OFFWITH HER HEAD!

     
  17. This is a really awesome car. I had the same engine stored in my shop for a few years for a friend, it finally sold 2 months ago. If I had seen your build before that, I'd most likely be working on something similar.

    If you want to get fancy, design the sprockets in halves so you can change them without pulling the wheels etc.. You could change ratios quicker that way. Look at shifter karts for examples.
     
  18. noboD
    Joined: Jan 29, 2004
    Posts: 8,488

    noboD
    Member

    Animal, back a ways I think you said you looked at sprockets. Have you looked in McMaster Carr for them? They have quite a few in flat sprockets fairly cheap. They could be split and bolted to a hub as, I THINK, Mcgyver was suggesting. I have seen this in use on big equipment and it works. I am sure other places have them too, but I like Mc Carr.
     
  19. animal8324
    Joined: Sep 28, 2012
    Posts: 136

    animal8324
    Member
    from nj

    What'd ya geet for it Mcgyver?

    I got the valve semi freed up but the guides are crumbling so she'll need a valve job atleast.
     
    Stogy, 1947knuck and loudbang like this.
  20. animal8324
    Joined: Sep 28, 2012
    Posts: 136

    animal8324
    Member
    from nj

    I havnt been able to dig into the head yet but I finished up the battery box, and upper rad support. Also used my CAD software to create floor templates.

    20201224_124649.jpg 20201224_124722.jpg 20201224_124730.jpg 20201224_124741.jpg
     
  21. j hansen
    Joined: Dec 22, 2012
    Posts: 5,504

    j hansen
    Member

    Hi Animal.
    I like where this build is going ,looks really nice.
    What kind of welding machine do you have? Skärmavbild 2020-12-25 kl. 07.14.42.png

    I think I have the same CAD :D
     
  22. dutchrod
    Joined: Feb 5, 2009
    Posts: 449

    dutchrod
    Member

    Really great build !
     
    Thor1 and loudbang like this.
  23. animal8324
    Joined: Sep 28, 2012
    Posts: 136

    animal8324
    Member
    from nj

    Currently I have the Prime weld Tig 225. It's a great machine.
     
    loudbang and j hansen like this.
  24. AmishMike
    Joined: Mar 27, 2014
    Posts: 984

    AmishMike
    Member

    Wow, what a great build. You going to add any kind of shock absorbers? May get to much bounce without. Watching closely.
     
  25. animal8324
    Joined: Sep 28, 2012
    Posts: 136

    animal8324
    Member
    from nj

    Thank you. I will add shock absorbers when I find a set I like. Probably just some simple friction shocks
     
  26. 51504bat
    Joined: May 22, 2010
    Posts: 4,794

    51504bat
    ALLIANCE MEMBER

  27. animal8324
    Joined: Sep 28, 2012
    Posts: 136

    animal8324
    Member
    from nj

    That's a badass build. Love his rear suspension. I may have to join thd short list of hambers that have built their own friction shocks lol
     
  28. Torchie
    Joined: Apr 17, 2011
    Posts: 1,099

    Torchie
    Member

    Late to the party but enjoying this build.
    As a youth I spent many hours at the Ford museum staring at the 999. What a beast that must have been to drive. And on the ice no less.
    It scared the crap out of me just sitting there with it's exposed fly wheel. LOL
    Old Henry and Barney Oldfield would be proud of you.
    Torchie
     
  29. Torchie
    Joined: Apr 17, 2011
    Posts: 1,099

    Torchie
    Member

    This is the one that I stared at as a youngster. It's referred to as the "Red One" , I believe.
    He had 2 racers by that name.
    Torchie henry-ford-became-the-fastest-man-on-earth-on-a-frozen-lake-1476933934506-1200x628.jpg henry-ford-became-the-fastest-man-on-earth-on-a-frozen-lake-1476933934506-1200x628.jpg Ford-999.jpg
     
  30. animal8324
    Joined: Sep 28, 2012
    Posts: 136

    animal8324
    Member
    from nj

    One of my great inspirations for this build Torchie.
     

Share This Page

Register now to get rid of these ads!

Archive

Copyright © 1995-2021 The Jalopy Journal: Steal our stuff, we'll kick your teeth in. Terms of Service. Privacy Policy.

Atomic Industry
Forum software by XenForo™ ©2010-2014 XenForo Ltd.