Register now to get rid of these ads!

Technical 55 Chevy gear ratio

Discussion in 'Traditional Hot Rods' started by PeggySue, Oct 7, 2020.

  1. PeggySue
    Joined: Sep 5, 2016
    Posts: 394

    PeggySue
    Member

    Looking at purchasing a Ford 9" Currie rear -end assembly. The tec where I'm going to buy at said 3.70 ratio would be a good cruiser. Everything I found said 60-70 mph you be at 3000 rpm's. My 55 is stock 2sp power glide but with a 327 /4barrel. The research I found said they were 3.55 for V8 & power glide back in 55. Wouldn't a 350 ratio be better cruiser?
     
    Last edited: Oct 7, 2020
  2. Johnny Gee
    Joined: Dec 3, 2009
    Posts: 12,687

    Johnny Gee
    Member
    from Downey, Ca

    It's possible the tech is trying to balance the first gear of the glide and is why he suggest's 3:70"s. But yes, 3:50's would be better RPM wise on the highway.
     
  3. PeggySue
    Joined: Sep 5, 2016
    Posts: 394

    PeggySue
    Member

    Thanks, just want a good cruiser
     
    loudbang likes this.
  4. I'd recommend a 3.5 or 3.55 as a compromise for all-around use with that engine and trans.

    Or 3.70 for mostly around-town or 3.0 for mostly highway driving.
    I had a stock 3.55:1 behind a Muncie M-22 & mild 355 SBC in my '55.:)
    Garys55.jpg
     

  5. Depends a lot on tire diameter.
     
    Baron, Elcohaulic, loudbang and 3 others like this.
  6. redo32
    Joined: Jul 16, 2008
    Posts: 2,166

    redo32
    Member

    Stock Tri 5's had a 3.36 rear with the powerglide. Stick trans were 3.55 or 3.70 and overdrive were 4.11. A couple of years later they had 3.08 for the powerglide. There is enough torque multiplication in the PG to run the higher gears. Kind of a dog around town, but better hwy cruiser.
    I'm wondering why you feel the need to put in a 9". With the PG you're not going to break the stock rearend.
     
  7. olscrounger
    Joined: Feb 23, 2008
    Posts: 4,774

    olscrounger
    ALLIANCE MEMBER

    Wife's 55 ran for many years as our main car with a PG and stout 327-had 3:55's Was and excellent cruiser at all speeds but 327 liked the R's too.
     
    1934coupe and Just Gary like this.
  8. A 3.50 gear is still pretty low for behind an automatic. That'll only gain you a bit less than a 200 RPM drop at freeway speeds over the 3.70. A 3.25 will save you closer to 400 RPM and still give good around town performance.

    But if it were me personally, I'd run a 3 flat... but most of my driving is at speeds of 50 MPH or more.
     
  9. redo32
    Joined: Jul 16, 2008
    Posts: 2,166

    redo32
    Member

    If this chart copies, it is for a 27" tall tire
    Using Transmission Gear Ratio: 1 gives these RPM data:
    Engine Speed (RPM) MPH 3.08 Gear MPH 3.36 Gear MPH 3.70 Gear
    8000 RPM 208.64 MPH 191.25 MPH 173.68 MPH
    7500 RPM 195.60 MPH 179.30 MPH 162.82 MPH
    7000 RPM 182.56 MPH 167.34 MPH 151.97 MPH
    6500 RPM 169.52 MPH 155.39 MPH 141.11 MPH
    6000 RPM 156.48 MPH 143.44 MPH 130.26 MPH
    5500 RPM 143.44 MPH 131.48 MPH 119.40 MPH
    5000 RPM 130.40 MPH 119.53 MPH 108.55 MPH
    4500 RPM 117.36 MPH 107.58 MPH 97.69 MPH
    4000 RPM 104.32 MPH 95.63 MPH 86.84 MPH
    3500 RPM 91.28 MPH 83.67 MPH 75.98 MPH
    3000 RPM 78.24 MPH 71.72 MPH 65.13 MPH
    2500 RPM 65.20 MPH 59.77 MPH 54.27 MPH
    2000 RPM 52.16 MPH 47.81 MPH 43.42 MPH
    1500 RPM 39.12 MPH 35.86 MPH 32.56 MPH
    1000 RPM 26.08 MPH 23.91 MPH 21.71 MPH
     
    Baron, loudbang and olscrounger like this.
  10. DDDenny
    Joined: Feb 6, 2015
    Posts: 19,265

    DDDenny
    Member
    from oregon

    I had a 57 BelAir in 1971, had a three speed in it when I bought it, had 3.08's and as far as I know they were original and hadn't been touched, when I blew up the spider gears and went to put the replacement third member (4.11's) in it I broke the head off of the slide hammer axle puller they were in there so long.
    I do know that gear swap and subsequent four speed change was like adding nitrous to it.
     
  11. redo32
    Joined: Jul 16, 2008
    Posts: 2,166

    redo32
    Member

    @DDDenny, First year for the 3.08 was 1959 with a 348 PG only. 1960 it was available with a 283PG also.
    I bought my first '57 in 1965, a red & white 4dr wagon. Blew up the PG, got a 3sp, blew that up & got BW 4sp. The spider gears in the 3.36 didn't last long, got a 4.11 posi, then 4.56 and the most fun was the 5.13. By that time I built a 270HP. Lots of fun from stoplight to stoplight. Floor it, shift 1,2,3 then slam on the brakes for the red light at the end of the block. Do it again.
     
  12. Budget36
    Joined: Nov 29, 2014
    Posts: 13,273

    Budget36
    Member

    @PeggySue
    I’d suggest figuring out what gear you have now, then look at a change in ratio If you are happy with highway rpms, no reason to change ratios. If you’re thinking of a future upgrade with power, etc as well as transmission, I’d suggest doing the tranny first. Think along the lines of a 2004R Then see how it runs/feels and adjust ratio in the rear from there
     
  13. Moriarity
    Joined: Apr 11, 2001
    Posts: 31,159

    Moriarity
    SUPER MODERATOR
    Staff Member

    55's and 56's were 3.55"s with a powerglide, 3.70 with a stick and 4.11"s with overdrive.
    57's because of the lower 14" tires were 3.36 for the powerglide cars, stick cars were 3.55 and still 4.11 for Overdrive...

    with all that said, how did it drive with the factory 3.55's in it? were you happy with it? Personally if it is a cruiser and most of the driving is on the freeway, I would go with the 3.0 gears for the ford rear that you now have....
     
    irishsteve and Just Gary like this.
  14. squirrel
    Joined: Sep 23, 2004
    Posts: 56,085

    squirrel
    Member

    I'd put 3.00s in it. Maybe even 2.75. I put a lot of miles on a 55 with 2.75 rear gears...
     
    Baumi, Baron, Just Gary and 2 others like this.
  15. PeggySue
    Joined: Sep 5, 2016
    Posts: 394

    PeggySue
    Member

    Having just bought the car a month ago, doesn't have tac, but having run equipment for 35 years can tell it cruises good now with stock rearend 55-60mph,which my research showed 3.55 for V8 /power glide for 1955 , figured 3.50 would be good. Just didn't want the tappets coming out of thevalve covers. Thanks for the responses give me much to consider.
     
    Just Gary likes this.
  16. olscrounger
    Joined: Feb 23, 2008
    Posts: 4,774

    olscrounger
    ALLIANCE MEMBER

    Should work--we drove ours for years with those at 70+ all over as our main car. 327 did just fine. 70000 miles like that.
     
  17. I can say from personal experience that a 4.10 gear with a 26 inch tire is not a good freeway combination. Good for 0-60 times, bad for extended 60 plus cruising. An SBC can take the rpms, but it will be a lot of engine noise and poor mileage.
    For the OP, I would suggest 3.36 to 3.00 gear for a nice driver.

    Sent from dumb operator on a smart phone
     
  18. jimmy six
    Joined: Mar 21, 2006
    Posts: 14,929

    jimmy six
    ALLIANCE MEMBER

    Not that it’s a 55 Chev but I went from 3.21 to 2.74 and could not be happier. Speed limits were 55 in the mid fifties when these cars came out. Your only draw back is the 2 speed trans that doesn’t have a gear in the mid 2’s to start out. With that said my 65 Chevelle 283-2 barrel had a 3.08 and was fine for the 15 years we had it. In the 60-70’s.
     
  19. Budget36
    Joined: Nov 29, 2014
    Posts: 13,273

    Budget36
    Member

    I’d still verify the ratio that is in the car now, lots can change in 65 years
     
    squirrel likes this.
  20. OP, if wasn't mentioned already, you can verify your current gear ratio, by...

    1) putting the rear end on jack stands
    2) mark your driveshaft with tape/chalk/etc
    3) trans in neutral
    4) spin rear tire manually 10 complete revolutions, while counting full & part revolutions of the drive shaft.

    for example, if you spin the tire 10 times, and the driveshaft makes basically 3.5 revolutions, then you have a 3.55. A 3.70 would be more like 3 & 3/4 revolutions. A 4.11 would be 4+ revolutions. I mention it so you can have a better idea or piece of mind when making your final choice of a rear gear if you think you might want to make adjustments in regards to the rpms generated at highway speeds.

    I say all that in light of the chance a different gear diff made it into your rear axle after the car left the factory.

    Best wishes with your choice,

    Gotta56forme/Scott
     
    Just Gary likes this.
  21. sdroadster
    Joined: Jul 27, 2006
    Posts: 425

    sdroadster
    Member

    Low gears and loud mufflers drive me crazy. They are cool as hell once around the block, but get old real fast. I have a 3.25 in my cruiser, and even that makes the motor run a little fast. I liked the 3.00 ring and pinion better.
     
  22. fastcar1953
    Joined: Oct 23, 2009
    Posts: 3,620

    fastcar1953
    Member

    my vote is 3.08 or 3.00. whichever is avaidable.
     
  23. Elcohaulic
    Joined: Dec 27, 2017
    Posts: 2,213

    Elcohaulic

    I like 2:73 with a Turbo 400 and build around that.. Too bad you don't have a 454, it would love the 3:08.. I heard the 454 is a lot of fun with a Turboglide.
     
  24. PeggySue
    Joined: Sep 5, 2016
    Posts: 394

    PeggySue
    Member

    Remember reading that some where before. Just looking at the rear-end housing everything looks stock, I know there's a chance the third member was changed but doesn't appear to be.
     
  25. PeggySue
    Joined: Sep 5, 2016
    Posts: 394

    PeggySue
    Member

    I just ordered a Currie 9" rear -end assembly with 3.50 third member. Thanks again for all the input.
     
    Just Gary and olscrounger like this.
  26. 1934coupe
    Joined: Feb 22, 2007
    Posts: 5,070

    1934coupe
    Member

    My vote is 3.50's you can cruise on highway and at least have some oomph around town where most do there driving. If I can go down highway at 2900-3000 doing 65MPH I'm happy. Also tire dia. can fine tune what you want on highway.

    Pat
     
    Just Gary and olscrounger like this.
  27. PeggySue
    Joined: Sep 5, 2016
    Posts: 394

    PeggySue
    Member

    Only picture I have off rear end
     

    Attached Files:

  28. Budget36
    Joined: Nov 29, 2014
    Posts: 13,273

    Budget36
    Member

    Nice choice. And thinking ahead, the PG might be a difficult item to have rebuilt. So a new tranny might be in order.

    So why change it out for a 9inch? Are you thinking of some engine upgrades, etc? Or is your rearend making noises, etc?
     
  29. PeggySue
    Joined: Sep 5, 2016
    Posts: 394

    PeggySue
    Member

    Pretty good howl to the rear end. The pinion seal is leaking, was low when I bought it . Probably been low and run before. Don't know about up grades time will tell and will be ready if I want to. Did some looking for used but sometimes up here in northern Minnesota your lucky to find bread and milk. LOL
     
    Budget36 likes this.
  30. My '56 210 howled when I got it, but I topped up the rear end fluid and she was good to go.
     

Share This Page

Register now to get rid of these ads!

Archive

Copyright © 1995-2021 The Jalopy Journal: Steal our stuff, we'll kick your teeth in. Terms of Service. Privacy Policy.

Atomic Industry
Forum software by XenForo™ ©2010-2014 XenForo Ltd.