Register now to get rid of these ads!

Technical 39 Ford Swan Shifter in 39 Ford

Discussion in 'The Hokey Ass Message Board' started by Montechris, Mar 15, 2020.

  1. Montechris
    Joined: Nov 15, 2004
    Posts: 529

    Montechris
    Member

    Hi Everyone,

    I recently purchased a 39 Ford Tudor Sedan with a 8BA and a what turns out to be a earlier trans (I think 36-38? Not a 39). The shifter that came in the car is the 37 style and when in reverse and second gear it hits the dash but is fully operable.

    I figured that I would get a 39 swan shifter so that the shifter would not hit the dash...and because it’s one of the perks of owning a 39.

    I found a 39 swan shifter and installed it today and it still hits the dash and won’t even catch second because of the obstruction...

    so why won’t a 39 shifter work in a 39 car? The early trans case is the same as the 39 and it locates correctly in the trans tunnel. My best guess is that I got a home made swan shifter but it looks pretty original. What do you think?

    here are the two shifters. Thanks for all help.

    Chris
     

    Attached Files:

  2. If the shift levers and pivots are working with no front to back extra slop, I would just custom bend one of those levers to suit the situation. I did that with a number of Hurst type levers just using wood/brass/aluminum blocks in a larger bench vise. It should be very simple with the Ford levers, also. The bends needed are gentle and subtle and won't stress or fatigue the metal.
     
    Last edited: Mar 15, 2020
    hotrodjack33, clem and ClarkH like this.
  3. rusty valley
    Joined: Oct 25, 2014
    Posts: 3,885

    rusty valley
    Member

    easy to do it in the car if you can protect the carpet from the torch. heat it up at the bottom bend where it comes out of the tower, and use 1st or reverse to bend against so you are not pushing on the syncros of 2nd and third. or, do it in the vise. almost all need to be tweeked to fit
     
    hotrodjack33 likes this.
  4. clem
    Joined: Dec 20, 2006
    Posts: 4,220

    clem
    Member

    Only takes a moment to pop it out of the car, (looks like it is currently out ), and tweak it to suit.
    I cold bent mine and then cut a few inches off mine and re- threaded it.
     
    hotrodjack33 likes this.

  5. hotrodjack33
    Joined: Aug 19, 2019
    Posts: 4,155

    hotrodjack33
    ALLIANCE MEMBER

    I had just the opposite problem in my old '46 Ford pickup. The stock (straight) shifter would hit the (school bus) bench seat I installed. Pulled it out and stuck it in the vice (with wood bocks to keep from marring it up). Thought I would have to use heat, but found that I could curve it cold by yanking on it, move it a couple inches in the vice and yank it again. It took a couple of these procedures to get it just right, but ended up with a nice lookin S (swan) shifter that cleared the seat AND the dash.
     
  6. Montechris
    Joined: Nov 15, 2004
    Posts: 529

    Montechris
    Member

    Yeah it’s a quick fix but I’m curious why a 39 shifter would not work in a 39 car and also I would like to know if I have a legit 39 swan, I’ll bend the other if that’s the case to save the true 39.

    I believe the 39 swans are still pretty desirable?

    thanks for all of the input so far.

    Chris
     
  7. rusty valley
    Joined: Oct 25, 2014
    Posts: 3,885

    rusty valley
    Member

    its hard to say it wasnt bent by some one else to fit something else in its 80 year history. if only this old junk could talk, the stories we'd hear!
     
    clem likes this.
  8. clem
    Joined: Dec 20, 2006
    Posts: 4,220

    clem
    Member

    As above, bent by someone else ?
     
  9. 42merc
    Joined: Dec 19, 2010
    Posts: 899

    42merc
    Member

    Parts are 80 plus years old, how many owners have fussed with them ?
     
  10. continentaljohn
    Joined: Jul 24, 2002
    Posts: 5,538

    continentaljohn
    Member

    image.jpg To me both look to be 1937 style shifters as the 1939 shifter has a different taper . It is not much but is different and you can tell buy the 2 inch mark and the 37 is .030 thicker and at 4 inches is .050 and even at 16 inches is thicker then the 1939. The 39 also has almost a flat area and from your pictures I cant see that slight area.
     

Share This Page

Register now to get rid of these ads!

Archive

Copyright © 1995-2021 The Jalopy Journal: Steal our stuff, we'll kick your teeth in. Terms of Service. Privacy Policy.

Atomic Industry
Forum software by XenForo™ ©2010-2014 XenForo Ltd.