Register now to get rid of these ads!

Projects 1939 to a 1934

Discussion in 'Traditional Customs' started by Vern Lee, Jan 19, 2020.

  1. Vern Lee
    Joined: Dec 23, 2019
    Posts: 60

    Vern Lee
    Member

    I just bought a 1939 Mercury chassis , not restored but cleaned up painted , rebuilt flathead , over all pretty darn nice and original , My Plan , I want to put a 34 three or five window coupe body on it , same wheel base , 39 is about 4 inches wider , I've already had one person tell me it can't be done , But my dream ride won't die that easy , Just from the info I have supplied , what comments , help , suggestions can you guys give me , my biggest draw back at this point is I don't have a body yet , it will end up being a glass body because that is what I can afford , I really need some direction here , thanks , Vern
     
  2. deathrowdave
    Joined: May 27, 2014
    Posts: 3,544

    deathrowdave
    ALLIANCE MEMBER
    from NKy

    My greatest question is , why ?
     
    Toyjunky, Blue One, da34guy and 2 others like this.
  3. Vern Lee
    Joined: Dec 23, 2019
    Posts: 60

    Vern Lee
    Member

    Why Not ? it's hot rodding isn't it ? , I could spend thousands on a 34 frame , but I already have this one I want a 34 so I have to figure the most economical way to do it , not the easiest .
     
  4. rusty rocket
    Joined: Oct 30, 2011
    Posts: 5,070

    rusty rocket
    Member

    You just don't do stuff like that. There are unwritten rules of things to do and not to do and this would be one of them!
     
    Blue One, 38nailhead, Kiwi 4d and 4 others like this.

  5. Daddy_O
    Joined: Sep 5, 2007
    Posts: 578

    Daddy_O
    Member

    Stop. Only chassis for a '33-'34 body is a '33-'34 frame.
     
    ted kovacs and Blue One like this.
  6. WiredSpider
    Joined: Dec 29, 2012
    Posts: 1,252

    WiredSpider
    Member

    Why would you ruin both a Mercury chassis and a 34 coupe body?
    Get the right chassis
     
    Blue One and nunattax like this.
  7. Vern Lee
    Joined: Dec 23, 2019
    Posts: 60

    Vern Lee
    Member

    Well thanks for all your help and support , I knew this was the go to source for answers.
     
    RRanchero Rick and vtx1800 like this.
  8. rustythumb
    Joined: Nov 24, 2008
    Posts: 103

    rustythumb
    Member

    merc wheelbase is longer.
     
    Lasallefever likes this.
  9. 34floorssmalljimmy.jpg 34framepainted.jpg The back of the merc frame would land outside the body because it's too wide. UP front, the original 34 chassis had the front spring on top of the axle...merc axle was behind the spring. The merc spring would land right where the 34 grill resides. Plus, the 34 front frame is very tapered and only about 20 inches wide at the front....the merc doesn't taper and would [again] sit ouitside the 34 body.
    I'd sell that merc chassis and put the $$ toward a 33-34 chassis. There is one right now in our classifieds...needs some love on the bottom of the frame rail but it looks pretty good.
    This, from a guy who built my own 34 coupe.
     
    Last edited: Jan 19, 2020
  10. It’s only metal.
    Gonna require some frame surgery.
    If you’re asking it might be a little advanced though
     
    VANDENPLAS likes this.
  11. What everybody is saying is that the look and stance of a 33-34 Ford is in the foundation. Bout impossible, and I did say about, not completely, without the correct foundation.
     
  12. thirtytwo
    Joined: Dec 19, 2003
    Posts: 2,639

    thirtytwo
    Member

    It’s more than the wheelbase, it’s about engine location,ect...a friend put a 34 pickup together out of scraps this way it looked good .... but he had the skills and a good eye

    more than likely you are going to have to shorten torq tube to ge motor back to the firewall where it should be then the x member would change, pedals will be a wrong location, your going to have to pus front cross forward the floor won’t fit the frame contour ect ect it’s not a simple drop body on deal

    with all that fab work might as well buy a new pr of 34 rails at $700 too
     
  13. Dirty Dug
    Joined: Jan 11, 2003
    Posts: 3,712

    Dirty Dug
    Member

    Pure and simple you'll ruin two cars not just one.
     
  14. Had the same questions about my RPU on a 39 frame....it'll work with some adjustments...... my rpu front pic .JPG
     
  15. seb fontana
    Joined: Sep 1, 2005
    Posts: 8,486

    seb fontana
    Member
    from ct

    Ya Gotta Wanna..Doesn't mean ya should!
     
    kidcampbell71 and lothiandon1940 like this.
  16. rusty valley
    Joined: Oct 25, 2014
    Posts: 3,885

    rusty valley
    Member

    model T's thru to 32 body's sit on top of the frame rail. 33/34/ model 40's are the first year that ford "channeled" the body, so the floor is still at frame height, but the bottom of the body, the doors, and the rockers are midway down the frame rail. shown quite nicely in rocky's photo. in 35, frames got wider, longer, and became basically the same until 41. so as many have said above, why the fuck would you want to fight with the obvious fact that it dont even remotely fit? new bare rails are available, your frame is worth something to the right guy, sell it, buy some rails and build or buy some cross members. also, i hate to burst your bubble, but stillrunners, that looks like a perfectly good waste of a nice rp body imho
     
    stillrunners likes this.
  17. rusty valley
    Joined: Oct 25, 2014
    Posts: 3,885

    rusty valley
    Member

    theres a frame on ebay for 1500
     
  18. Ryans65
    Joined: Apr 12, 2018
    Posts: 90

    Ryans65
    Member
    from Yulee FL

    Buy my 33 frame for $2250. Its on here and pretty damn nice.
     
  19. 'Mo
    Joined: Sep 26, 2007
    Posts: 7,432

    'Mo
    Member

    How about laying up your own Fiberglass body, to fit your frame?
    It would cost less than the Ford body, fit "like it was made for it", and be truly unique.
    http://www.home-built-cord.com/Page4.html

    How does the "Vern Lee Special" grab you? ;)
    Something like this would be great!
    [​IMG]
     
    Last edited: Jan 22, 2020
  20. I had this one for a while.
    It was on a 35-40 ford frame. I don’t know if 39 mercury chassis is the same as ford or not.
    I didn’t build it but it worked.
    8767823B-C4F1-4303-A4BC-E9B3BBFC11FF.png

    It was channeled WAY deep, and on the wrong chassis but I bought it anyways because the body was really nice otherwise.
    The very first thing I did was get a 34 frame. I had to buy the entire lot and pile of stuff to get the 34 chassis the guy had.
     
    kidcampbell71 and Tim like this.
  21. KevKo
    Joined: Jun 25, 2009
    Posts: 930

    KevKo
    Member
    from Motown

    That '39 frame could be the start of a Sports Car Special like the Baldwin Merc.
     

    Attached Files:

  22. hotrodjack33
    Joined: Aug 19, 2019
    Posts: 4,151

    hotrodjack33
    ALLIANCE MEMBER

    This is an example of the kind of thing that happens when you use the wrong frame. A'34 ford has a 112" wheelbase. '39 Merc is 116"...so at the very least, you have to make up that 4" at the cowl...because the rear wheels have to line up with rear wheel wells. As you see...stuff like this just doesn't work:eek:
    goofy 3.jpg
     
  23. Tim
    Joined: Mar 2, 2001
    Posts: 17,197

    Tim
    Member
    from KCMO

    I dont know guys rob lee in Omaha put his model A on a 42-6 chassis and it looks killer.

    Granted he cut it up 6 ways from Sunday but I mean you “could” do it.

    Personally I’d take the axles, drive train, wishbones, torque tube,steering and center cross member and pitch the rails.

    buy some box steel for the rails and build a new chassis. The amount of welding rob had to do to make that look as gorgeous as it does was monumental
     
  24. “Just from the info I have supplied , what comments , help , suggestions can you guys give me”

    Probably not everything you wanted to hear , but you did get everything you asked for.
    Can’t knock the Hamb for that!
     
    Blue One and 6inarow like this.
  25. After I think about it a bit, if I was going to contemplate this job, I'd prolly completely disassemble the merc's frame. I'd build it back, using custom or model A crossmembers front and back...might have to shorten the rails and I'd try to reuse the Merc's "X" member. If I had to I'd borrow a 33-34 body to set up my body mounts, set the engine, place the suspension etc etc. It'd be a big job but I know what it's like to be bucks-down.
    Rob Lee's A-coupe is on a 40 ford frame???? Here it is. He really must have cut that frame up to the max but he's known for doing that kinda stuff. robleecoupeb4paint.JPG
     
  26. Squablow
    Joined: Apr 26, 2005
    Posts: 17,432

    Squablow
    Member

    It could work, I remember seeing a picture of a '34 frame sitting on top of (I think) a 35-40 Ford car frame, the kickup shape in the rear is very similar, and the X in the center of the frame is a nice starting point. But like Rocky said, you'd have to take the frame apart, cut it up and weld it back together in the '34 configuration. You'd be able to use the spindles and wishbone up front but you'll probably need a different crossmember, axle and spring, the rear you could use but you'll likely have to shorten the enclosed driveshaft. The frame would need to be shortened overall, and probably pinched.

    It definitely could be done with enough effort. A frame table and a lot of frame building experience would be a must, but could be done. I'd rather have a radically reworked '39 Merc chassis under my '34 than a pair of those repop rail stampings held together by round tube crossmembers.
     
  27. After I bought his 1924 T Firetruck - I stayed after the RPU in the garage - never thinking I'd get the call as he had a couple of boys he was still working with. Got the call one evening to come and get it - see the lettering on the side ? It says F u....think the boys painted it and that's why I got the call. It was built that way in the mid 60's with full fenders and extended running boards. Sold my 1941 Panel to fund it and then sold it to a HAMB'r to fund my 1930 Cabriolet...that motor ran......
     
  28. Come to think about it, my ol buddy, Steve didn't have a frame for his '29 roadster. Steve disassembled a 46 ford frame [ has a KILLER rear kickup] and modified it to work under this narrow body. It's not done in the photo but you get the idea... steveanroadster.jpg
     
    kidcampbell71 and Squablow like this.

Share This Page

Register now to get rid of these ads!

Archive

Copyright © 1995-2021 The Jalopy Journal: Steal our stuff, we'll kick your teeth in. Terms of Service. Privacy Policy.

Atomic Industry
Forum software by XenForo™ ©2010-2014 XenForo Ltd.