Register now to get rid of these ads!

Technical Very Hokey Rear gear v. Torque/power band

Discussion in 'The Hokey Ass Message Board' started by 70executive-Catalina, Aug 23, 2019.

  1. 70executive-Catalina
    Joined: Dec 20, 2018
    Posts: 66

    70executive-Catalina
    Member
    from Canada

    Okay,

    So I’m driving along on the highway doing 75 MPH, when some wannabe pulls up beside me in his 2008 V6 charger. I’m thinking sweet this should be easy I’ll dust this guy with my hot 350sbc.

    So we both floor it and he pulls ahead of me no problem while I’m lugging up to 4000 rpm. Once at speed i easily pass him ( I’ve got tons of rpm to spare ).
    Months later I’m on the Hamb having Vietnam flashbacks to that humiliating moment of realization that maybe my hot 350 isn’t so hot?
    4200lb Pontiac, 2.56 final drive 3rd gear @1 ( TH350 ), 750 Holley 4160, 1 3/8 headers dual exhaust straight out behind rear tires.
    Current solution: better cam (2800-6800rpm), 2600 rpm torque converter, and 3.08 gears.
    Actual discussion point: final drive vs torque curve?
    Hypothetically your torque curve is 3300-4000 hitting 419 max and dropping off to 380 after 4000rpm. 3.08 gears put you at 75 mph doing 3300.
    3.73-4.11 gears are bigger and faster? Faster as in you run out of rpm or faster as in acceleration?
     
  2. Boneyard51
    Joined: Dec 10, 2017
    Posts: 6,451

    Boneyard51
    Member

    Horsepower curve vs torque curve... sweet spot is a much argued point and could be different on different combos. Lower gearing will help you in most instances, up to a point. A 2:56 final gearing will probably never give you a good 50 mph trope off. But you don’t want 4:11 for a crusier with out an overdrive transmission. The best combo would be the 4:11 and an overdrive auto.




    Bones
     
    61Cruiser likes this.
  3. town sedan
    Joined: Aug 18, 2011
    Posts: 1,290

    town sedan
    Member

    You need a bigger stick, like something based off a 455 starting point. Your axle gears will be fine then.
    -Dave
     
    Boneyard51 likes this.
  4. Rex_A_Lott
    Joined: Feb 5, 2007
    Posts: 1,155

    Rex_A_Lott
    Member

    Did the passing gear not work? 4200 lbs and a 2.56 gear aint going to be no rocket, but you should have plenty of top end on the highway. To answer your question, the larger the rear gear number, the faster the car takes off, but it also runs out of breath sooner. Good luck.
     
    Just Gary, Hnstray and Boneyard51 like this.

  5. Blues4U
    Joined: Oct 1, 2015
    Posts: 7,589

    Blues4U
    Member
    from So Cal

    You've got some pretty small tires (23.5") to turn 3300 RPM at 75mph with 3.08 gears. What are you running?
     
    Boneyard51 and Truckdoctor Andy like this.
  6. Budget36
    Joined: Nov 29, 2014
    Posts: 13,273

    Budget36
    Member

    Little engine info would help...but 2.56's are not gonna get out of the way of too many cars with a SBC...
     
    61Cruiser and Boneyard51 like this.
  7. Mike VV
    Joined: Sep 28, 2010
    Posts: 3,042

    Mike VV
    Member
    from SoCal

    Yea, either a LARGE inch engine, or properly matched gears in smaller inch engines.
    Normally a 3.73 or 3.90 ratio is a great compromise for power at the ground and overall driveability, including the freeways. You shouldn't be afraid to let the engine breath a little on the freeways.
    I've run both gears in cars over the years. I have a set of 3.73's in a car I'm building right now. Small inch engine, NEEDS gear to help it run well.

    Mike
     
    Frankie47, pitman and Boneyard51 like this.
  8. Was this at the salt flats??? 2.56 WTH,
    3.73 gears and a straight three speed automatic transmission with a SBC would work great.
    ^2X what happened to your kick down?
    3.90 gears and an overdrive would work great.
     
    Boneyard51 likes this.
  9. oldiron 440
    Joined: Dec 12, 2018
    Posts: 3,331

    oldiron 440
    Member

    Looks like your trying to run a buck fifty. lol
     
    Montana1 and Boneyard51 like this.
  10. gene-koning
    Joined: Oct 28, 2016
    Posts: 4,094

    gene-koning
    Member

    I think you need a reality check! The V6 Charger probably has as much hp and torque as your old school sbc. If you started at 75 mph, the only reason you passed him "at speed" was because his computer limited his speed to around 112 or 116 mph. If you would have started from a dead stop, you may never had seen his tail lights again because of your rear end gear. He started out with somewhere around a 3:55 rear gear, then the 6 speed auto has 2 sets of OD gears, knocking the final drive down to around your rear gear. At the point his computer limits his top speed, he is probably not near the motors red line. If he had bought a performance computer, it would not have limited his top speed, though his brain may have set his limit.

    Old speed technology is good stuff when it doesn't have to be compromised to meet the standards we set (fuel economy, drive ability at anything other then wide open throttle). Old speed can get to a predetermined speed really really fast, or it can go really fast but it is a little slower getting to the real fast speed. A computer that controls the ignition system, the fuel system, has the ability to vary the cam timing, and can control the gear selection every 1/100th of a second is a pretty tough competitor. Gene
     
  11. 70executive-Catalina
    Joined: Dec 20, 2018
    Posts: 66

    70executive-Catalina
    Member
    from Canada

    They are 26.1”
     
  12. 70executive-Catalina
    Joined: Dec 20, 2018
    Posts: 66

    70executive-Catalina
    Member
    from Canada

    I want to be right in my torque curve like I said, so with a 3.08 rear gear and TH350 3rd I should sit at 75 MPH @3300rpm with 400 Tq (ish). Drop off for tq is 4000. Will I beat someone who has 3.73 or 3.90 at that speed? This is just random highways in Canada btw
     
  13. gimpyshotrods
    Joined: May 20, 2009
    Posts: 23,333

    gimpyshotrods
    ALLIANCE MEMBER

    700R4, 3.73:1 rear gears.
     
    RICH B likes this.
  14. southcross2631
    Joined: Jan 20, 2013
    Posts: 4,413

    southcross2631
    Member

    You need a real motor to pull that boat. Not a small block Chevy. I realize the Canadian Pontiacs didn't get the good stuff. I owned a 68 Grand Prix with a 428 Pontiac and I would run the speedo off the dash with no hesitation . It would run an honest buck and a half. It only had an Edelbrock intake and a ram air cam and 2 1/2 inch exhaust. It had a 2.41 gear.
     
  15. 70executive-Catalina
    Joined: Dec 20, 2018
    Posts: 66

    70executive-Catalina
    Member
    from Canada

    True, very true. That’s a very cool car you owned, btw. I guess for now I will try this new cam, high stall and if necessary 3.36 gears and porting heads.
     
  16. Frankie47
    Joined: Dec 20, 2008
    Posts: 1,877

    Frankie47
    Member
    from omaha ne.

    Here is your competitor.......

    Canadian 3.5 liter SOHC V6 Charger 250 HP @ 6,400 RPMS
    250 FT-LBS @ 3,800 RPMS
    4 speed automatic transmission
    2.82 rear
    weight 3,800 LBS
     
  17. X-cpe
    Joined: Mar 9, 2018
    Posts: 1,985

    X-cpe

    Typo?
     
  18. gimpyshotrods
    Joined: May 20, 2009
    Posts: 23,333

    gimpyshotrods
    ALLIANCE MEMBER

    Let's hope so. On a stock 350 1-1/2" would be fine. With decent hop-up: 1-5/8".

    I rarely see 1-3/4" on a good running street engine.
     
  19. seb fontana
    Joined: Sep 1, 2005
    Posts: 8,493

    seb fontana
    Member
    from ct

    Loose a thousand pounds..
     
    Just Gary likes this.
  20. Blues4U
    Joined: Oct 1, 2015
    Posts: 7,589

    Blues4U
    Member
    from So Cal

    Your figures are off. With 26.1" rear tires & 3.08 rear gears you'll be spinning the engine 2974 rpm's at 75 MPH.

    https://www.strangeengineering.net/gear-ratio-calculator/
     
    gimpyshotrods likes this.

Share This Page

Register now to get rid of these ads!

Archive

Copyright © 1995-2021 The Jalopy Journal: Steal our stuff, we'll kick your teeth in. Terms of Service. Privacy Policy.

Atomic Industry
Forum software by XenForo™ ©2010-2014 XenForo Ltd.