Register now to get rid of these ads!

Customs 57 FORD GASSER BUILD

Discussion in 'The Hokey Ass Message Board' started by Lee Veinotte, Feb 6, 2019.

  1. Lee Veinotte
    Joined: Feb 6, 2019
    Posts: 142

    Lee Veinotte

    I would think the H+M chaps know what they're up to. I'll go with that!
     
    loudbang likes this.
  2. Chainsaw chipper
    Joined: Nov 29, 2007
    Posts: 365

    Chainsaw chipper
    Member
    from Illinois

    And I don't,just kidding as long as they flow in a circle your good.A well known header builder once told me if you think you can ,then you can and if you think you can't then you won't.I always remember that .
     
    scott27 and loudbang like this.
  3. I'm not sure why I do this but I do clockwise on the Driver side and counter clockwise on the Passenger side. I had a curious customer ask me why once. I was feeling like a bit of a Smart Ass that day and I told him it was to keep the Exhaust torque rolling the chassis into the Roll Center of the Car. He bought it and has passed it on. I still Chuckell under my breath.
     
    wvenfield, loudbang and Lee Veinotte like this.
  4. Lee Veinotte
    Joined: Feb 6, 2019
    Posts: 142

    Lee Veinotte

    I'm a bit OCD on that stuff so I think i'll probably end up doing the same.
     
    loudbang likes this.
  5. Lee Veinotte
    Joined: Feb 6, 2019
    Posts: 142

    Lee Veinotte

    No huge updates. Just been picking away at the front frame section. Got my spreader bar all tacked in place, need to make a couple end caps and it can all be finished welded and the axle hung. 20190320_203336.jpg
     
    Sky Six, loudbang and wvenfield like this.
  6. Sky Six
    Joined: Mar 15, 2018
    Posts: 9,517

    Sky Six
    Member
    from Arizona

    looks clean, how is the knee?
     
    loudbang likes this.
  7. Lee Veinotte
    Joined: Feb 6, 2019
    Posts: 142

    Lee Veinotte

    Its coming along thanks for asking, I can crawl around again just can't kneel on my left for a while yet. I'm back at the gym and all is feeling good.
     
    loudbang likes this.
  8. birdman1
    Joined: Dec 6, 2012
    Posts: 1,593

    birdman1
    Member

    put a 383 1958 Merc in my brothers "57 custom in 1969. 312HP engine, with a T-85 3-speed. Nice motor. Have fun with your "57.
     
    loudbang and Lee Veinotte like this.
  9. Lee Veinotte
    Joined: Feb 6, 2019
    Posts: 142

    Lee Veinotte

    Big day today. Got the axle located and the spring hangers tacked into their final resting place. Loving the look of everything so far. Engine positioning is next! 20190331_190955.jpg 20190331_192732.jpg
     
  10. Lee Veinotte
    Joined: Feb 6, 2019
    Posts: 142

    Lee Veinotte

    Shes almost a roller! Studs for the tie rod are on the wrong steering arms I know lol. 20190401_212852.jpg
     
    Sky Six and loudbang like this.
  11. Lee Veinotte
    Joined: Feb 6, 2019
    Posts: 142

    Lee Veinotte

    Shes back on 4 wheels! Loving it.
    Also got the plates fitted to the engine. Tomorrow night is mockup time. 20190402_201013.jpg 20190402_193458.jpg 20190402_211341.jpg
     
  12. Sky Six
    Joined: Mar 15, 2018
    Posts: 9,517

    Sky Six
    Member
    from Arizona

    Looking good, you've done a boatload of work in such a short time.
     
    loudbang likes this.
  13. RmK57
    Joined: Dec 31, 2008
    Posts: 2,694

    RmK57
    Member

    What are the casting numbers on the heads? I think the CJ's were D0OE-R.
     
    loudbang likes this.
  14. Firedup
    Joined: Feb 2, 2018
    Posts: 147

    Firedup
    Member
    from Oregon

    I’ve been watching this build. Looks awesome. Keep up the good work
     
    Lee Veinotte and loudbang like this.
  15. loudbang
    Joined: Jul 23, 2013
    Posts: 40,293

    loudbang
    Member

    Man you are moving along at a fast clip. :)
     
  16. Lee Veinotte
    Joined: Feb 6, 2019
    Posts: 142

    Lee Veinotte

    Unfortunately they're not the original CJ heads. They've been swapped with a set of early PI heads. They are supposed to be a better street head. CJ sized valves with slightly smaller ports. The block is a true thick web CJ block however.
     
    loudbang likes this.
  17. Lee Veinotte
    Joined: Feb 6, 2019
    Posts: 142

    Lee Veinotte

    Appreciate the kind words!
     
    loudbang likes this.
  18. Lee Veinotte
    Joined: Feb 6, 2019
    Posts: 142

    Lee Veinotte

    So i've got the engine mocked up in the front frame. The motor sits nicely between the rails but I may have an issue. The axle is only about 4" from the pan. The drag link will be even closer. I'm at 27" crank center from the floor on the balancer bolt. I'd like to get it down to 24" as per 67' rules. However i don't see how I can lower the engine or the suspension that much. Any ideas? 20190403_185751.jpg 20190403_185828.jpg 20190403_185839.jpg
     
    loudbang and Firedup like this.
  19. Lee Veinotte
    Joined: Feb 6, 2019
    Posts: 142

    Lee Veinotte

    I got looking around at the Shakey Pudding '55 and she wouldn't have any more than 4" between the axle and the underside of the frame. And much less than that between the drag link and pan. I doubt my car will pull the wheels and come down like that honey does so i may be ok?

    "Photos borrowed from the build thread, please delete if it's not allowed" DSCN0460.jpg DSCN0461.jpg
     
    loudbang and Firedup like this.
  20. RmK57
    Joined: Dec 31, 2008
    Posts: 2,694

    RmK57
    Member

    A rear sump pan. Like a 429-460 Fox body swap oil pan.
     
    loudbang likes this.
  21. Lee Veinotte
    Joined: Feb 6, 2019
    Posts: 142

    Lee Veinotte

    Only thing is the drag link will have no clearance with a rear sump. Its path may even want to go through the sump.
     
    loudbang likes this.
  22. Dang,, it's all that Math stuff that gets us screwed up eh? If I'm reading this photo right
    [​IMG]Judging by your valve cover to master and carb base on tunnel ram to hood latch, looks to me like your motor is mounted way low based on where it would be in stock 57 mount location. Is this correct?
     
  23. Sky Six
    Joined: Mar 15, 2018
    Posts: 9,517

    Sky Six
    Member
    from Arizona

    I just checked the position of my 292 in my '57 Fairlane, and the engine does look like its sitting low. Good eye PnB.
     
    loudbang likes this.
  24. Lee Veinotte
    Joined: Feb 6, 2019
    Posts: 142

    Lee Veinotte

    Yes judging by the picture I have of the 289 that came in the car it is sitting a bit low. It can be raised but I'll have to build some fancy brackets for my plates. I'm basing the engine height on the rulebook for gas class cars. My car is not very correct with the later engine ect but I'd like to keep it somewhat correct. I can raise the engine and lower the suspension, its very stiff as is so I would like to remove a leaf. But I still won't make up 3 inches of crank height. 20190209_190305.jpg
     
    loudbang likes this.
  25. saltflats
    Joined: Aug 14, 2007
    Posts: 12,602

    saltflats
    Member
    from Missouri

    What is the angle of the shackles with all the weight on it?
     
    loudbang likes this.
  26. Lee Veinotte
    Joined: Feb 6, 2019
    Posts: 142

    Lee Veinotte

    Haven't welded the shackle mounts on yet. Used a spacer to mimic the height of the shackle to the spring eye so when the weight is on I can set them at the proper angle.
     
    loudbang likes this.
  27. I could give you a valve cover to weld seam if you like. So, were I doing this job the motor would be sitting in Factory location no matter how it was mounted. Reason being is Clutch linkage, why re design something that works just fine? Now that will raise the Crank C/L but may solve some of the other issues. I kind of get the Nose Bleed ride height but you may need to adjust some to fit the rules. I know everybody does it just like you did, in other words you followed the crowd. They may not want to fit the rules you do. What happens when you raise the motor to where it started and then mount your Axle on Top of the springs. Take some time and do some Math and get back to me. Screw the instructions and Screw how everyone else has done it. Make it work for your needs.
     
  28. oldiron 440
    Joined: Dec 12, 2018
    Posts: 3,328

    oldiron 440
    Member

    The crank centerline should be a few degrees up front frame centerline not nose down.
     
    wvenfield and loudbang like this.
  29. GearheadsQCE
    Joined: Mar 23, 2011
    Posts: 3,402

    GearheadsQCE
    Alliance Vendor

    The axle over the spring will get it down in a hurry, but might cause more interference issues.
    As the Wizard said, work to the clutch cross shaft. The front sump has always caused issues but they can be resolved. Another possibility would be to use a dropped axle. Seems like it's counter productive, but it gets the center of the axle out of the way.

    Looking at this, I'd say your WAY HIGH! For a guideline the South East Gassers have a max rocker panel height of around 11".

    [​IMG]
     
    loudbang likes this.
  30. Lee Veinotte
    Joined: Feb 6, 2019
    Posts: 142

    Lee Veinotte

    In that picture I've got the carb mounting flange set at 0° which equals about 3-4° downward slope of the engine itself.
     
    loudbang likes this.

Share This Page

Register now to get rid of these ads!

Archive

Copyright © 1995-2021 The Jalopy Journal: Steal our stuff, we'll kick your teeth in. Terms of Service. Privacy Policy.

Atomic Industry
Forum software by XenForo™ ©2010-2014 XenForo Ltd.