Register now to get rid of these ads!

Projects Is the flight-o-matic the same as the ford-o-matic/cruise-o-matic?

Discussion in 'The Hokey Ass Message Board' started by Ole_Red, Mar 28, 2019.

  1. Ole_Red
    Joined: Jul 29, 2009
    Posts: 596

    Ole_Red
    Member
    from 206, WA

    Title says it all. Are these transmissions the same?
     
  2. town sedan
    Joined: Aug 18, 2011
    Posts: 1,290

    town sedan
    Member

    I don't know. But, Ford used the Ford-O-Matic & Cruise-O-Matic names for years on different automatic transmissions.
    There might be similarities to the Studebaker transmission, but I'd be surprised if there was much, if any parts that would interchange.
    -Dave
     
    Ole_Red likes this.
  3. Ole_Red
    Joined: Jul 29, 2009
    Posts: 596

    Ole_Red
    Member
    from 206, WA

    Thanks.

    I found this bit on Wikipedia: "When Studebaker ran into financial difficulty in the mid-1950s, Studebaker turned to Ford and licensed the less expensive Ford-O-Matic, rebranded it as the Flight-O-Matic, and dropped the DG transmission from its line-up."

    But I haven't been able to confirm if they are mechanically the same or not. Might be looking for a floor shift for one if so.
     
  4. buds56
    Joined: Dec 9, 2004
    Posts: 205

    buds56
    Member

    Here's a page out of a 1966 Hollander interchange book.

    In the late 70's Just out of high school I worked in a trans shop, Now that was a long time ago but I thought these were made by borg warner and sold to different carmakers ford trans.jpg
     
    loudbang, deucemac and egads like this.

  5. The early (through '58) Ford-o-matic and Cruise-o-matic were essentially the same trans. Both were three speeds, with the major difference being the Ford-o-matic started out in 2nd gear (unless the throttle was fully mashed from a standstill), otherwise low gear had to be selected manually. It had PRNDL detents. The Cruise-o-matic had an additional detent (D1) that caused it to start in first. The D2 detent started in second, with low still manually available. Detents were PRND2D1L. With the addition of 'Select Shift' (Detents of PRND21) it became the FMX. Externally they all looked almost identical, featuring cast-iron main cases, with early versions having cast-iron tailshaft housings/Bells, the later ones switched to aluminum.

    In '59, Ford replaced the 3-speed Ford-o-matic with a 2-speed version. This version used an aluminum case IIRC. Replaced by the C4 in '64, although it carried over part way into '65 before finally disappearing.
     
  6. David Chandler
    Joined: Jan 27, 2007
    Posts: 1,101

    David Chandler
    Member

    Somewhere along the line they made a Merc O Matic. Probably the same as the Ford one. I remember a salesman telling my father it had a Merc O Matic, but it was a Mercury.
     
    loudbang likes this.
  7. goldmountain
    Joined: Jun 12, 2016
    Posts: 4,470

    goldmountain

    I seem to recall that Toyota used this transmission too.
     
  8. From 1956 up the cast iron Studebaker trans is pretty much the same as the Fordomatic or Mercomatic transmissions, almost all parts are identical
     
    loudbang likes this.
  9. Rusty O'Toole
    Joined: Sep 17, 2006
    Posts: 9,659

    Rusty O'Toole
    Member

    The way I heard it Studebaker developed their own automatic in cooperation with Borg Warner. Ford wanted to buy it but Studebaker refused. I believe they later made their own version, or bought it from BW.

    The BW transmission was used by Studebaker and AMC in the US, and was practically the only auto trans in Britain in the fifties and sixties and was used by Jaguar, Austin, and others.

    It would be interesting to know how similar these are and if parts interchange. The above Hollander manual seems to indicate they do. Flightomatic was Studebaker, Flashomatic was AMC, Cruiso Merco and Edsel are self explanatory, does anyone know who used Turbodrive and Multi - drive? Could Checker be in there?
     
    loudbang likes this.
  10. mgtstumpy
    Joined: Jul 20, 2006
    Posts: 9,214

    mgtstumpy
    Member

    Turbo-Drive was Lincoln and the other is 'Multi-drive' Merc-O-matic
    upload_2019-4-2_14-54-4.jpeg

    upload_2019-4-2_14-58-59.png

    upload_2019-4-2_15-0-51.png
     

Share This Page

Register now to get rid of these ads!

Archive

Copyright © 1995-2021 The Jalopy Journal: Steal our stuff, we'll kick your teeth in. Terms of Service. Privacy Policy.

Atomic Industry
Forum software by XenForo™ ©2010-2014 XenForo Ltd.