Register now to get rid of these ads!

History 330 or 331 Chevy? 60s drag racing

Discussion in 'The Hokey Ass Message Board' started by ShortyLaVen, Jan 15, 2019.

  1. ShortyLaVen
    Joined: Oct 13, 2008
    Posts: 680

    ShortyLaVen
    Member

    I was looking through a bunch of pictures on here and other sites of 60s Jr stock and modified production cars. I kept seeing in the captions "330ci Chevrolet". Now, I am familiar with a 331, being a .030" over 327. Did they just used to call that a 330 instead of a 331? If I was going to do some era inspired lettering on some engine parts and maybe a fender, would it be more accurate to say 330ci?
     
  2. 270283
    Joined: Jun 11, 2006
    Posts: 423

    270283

  3. slowmotion
    Joined: Nov 21, 2011
    Posts: 3,330

    slowmotion
    Member

    .020" over 327
    329.83 or 330
    Back when cubic dollars didn't rule the sport quite as much. No sense taking them out any further than needed. Leaves room for the next refresh/rebuild, if the block survives. :eek:
     
    BigDogSS likes this.
  4. Yup back when you could still commonly buy oversizes in increments of .010. I can remember going to the autoparts and ordering pistons +.010, .020 .030 and etc. It had as mush to do with being frugal as any other thing. We were living with survivors of the great depression and you didn't want to waste your block any faster than you absolutely had to.
     
    olcurmdgeon, Tim and slowmotion like this.

  5. sdluck
    Joined: Sep 19, 2006
    Posts: 3,193

    sdluck
    Member

    You can now order them in any size from .001 over
     
  6. DDDenny
    Joined: Feb 6, 2015
    Posts: 19,264

    DDDenny
    Member
    from oregon

    I was told there would be no math today so can someone tell me how big my 327+.040 is.
    I wouldn't want to claim 333 cubes when I only had 332.
    OK to round up though.:D
     
    Bandit Billy likes this.
  7. 56sedandelivery
    Joined: Nov 21, 2006
    Posts: 6,695

    56sedandelivery
    Member Emeritus

    Machine shops also used to stock semi-finished pistons; meaning the machinist finish machined them to whatever oversize was needed, and it kept the inventory to a minimum. He literally made his own oversize pistons right in the shop. Not many places in the entire country have the equipment to do that anymore, and it's not cheap. I learned that the hard way after buying some ".030 over", forged pistons for a Chevrolet 265 (the 55-57 ones, not the late model, baby LT1, L99 engines). Had to do some research to find out what "semi-finished" on the boxes meant; even my machinist was't aware of this. I don't think the seller even knew what he had; a lot of vendors buy lots of old parts to resell for profit. I did get a couple of quotes to have them finish machined; the cheaper one was $800.00 to machine and balance them. Needless to say, they went back to the seller, and I got a refund. I am Butch/56sedandelivery.
     
  8. daliant
    Joined: Nov 25, 2009
    Posts: 700

    daliant
    Member

    Maybe they didn't want confusion with the Chrysler 331 hemi.
     
    Atwater Mike likes this.
  9. Tickety Boo
    Joined: Feb 2, 2015
    Posts: 1,619

    Tickety Boo
    Member
    from Wisconsin

    Around my area we always called it 331
    Must be like the 3" stroke 283 bored .125 over to 4" bore became a 301, then when Chevrolet built the same they called it a 302.
     
    Last edited: Jan 15, 2019
  10. ShortyLaVen
    Joined: Oct 13, 2008
    Posts: 680

    ShortyLaVen
    Member

    I didn't even think about .020 overbore... what a maroon I am haha! I have one 327 in my garage that is .040 over, but I guess "my generation" is just used to .030 and .060 for some reason.

    Some kind of differentiation with Chryslers and Cadillacs was my initial thought. But then there's the 330 Olds...
     
  11. buffaloracer
    Joined: Aug 22, 2004
    Posts: 816

    buffaloracer
    Member
    from kansas

    333.1
     
  12. oldolds
    Joined: Oct 18, 2010
    Posts: 3,408

    oldolds
    Member

    The 330 may have been done because maybe there was a rule in that organization of a 330 ci. limit. I seem to think that was the rule at the my local track in the 70's. So 329.83 would have been good when they were checked. As I think more about it it may have even been 320 ci. at one point.
     
  13. Jmountainjr
    Joined: Dec 29, 2006
    Posts: 1,678

    Jmountainjr
    ALLIANCE MEMBER

    I don't care what you call it, but standing there and listening to Grump spin that mouse motor 9200 / 9300 RPM was a trip.
    grumps toy.jpg
     
  14. Bruce Lancaster
    Joined: Oct 9, 2001
    Posts: 21,681

    Bruce Lancaster
    Member Emeritus

    At least into the '60's, minor overhaul type bore jobs were ignored in normal car-speak. An .020 283 was a 283, period, with no need to note the few extra cubes except perhaps when ordering rings or whatever. Perhaps a 292 and certainly a 301 were considered worth mentioning.
     
    Moriarity, Atwater Mike and dan c like this.
  15. Part of the 302 moniker from Chevrolet was a marketing ploy. Ford had a "Better Idea" and built a 302. The Chevrolet Division of GM was in direct competition with Ford. Then there was the fact that hot rodders had been building 301 inch motors for quite a while. Chevrolet wanted something better in the Camaro so it really couldn't be something that someone else thought up could it.

    Someone mentioned that you could order pistons in over sizes in .001 increments. That is true, you can buy forged pistons in pretty near any configuration you want from JE Pistons, or at least you could last I checked. They machine all their pistons from forged slugs and will custom machine about anything you want. Better have deep pockets though.
     
    Tickety Boo likes this.
  16. lippy
    Joined: Sep 27, 2006
    Posts: 6,826

    lippy
    Member
    from Ks

    Before sonic testing we NEVER went over .030 on a 327. A .060 327 was asking for trouble. Pin holes developed in the cyl walls , ran hot from thin cyl walls ect... now in proportion, I bet the percentage of 283's that would go .125 over was far greater than the amount of 327's that would go .060. :D
     
    Atwater Mike likes this.
  17. DDDenny
    Joined: Feb 6, 2015
    Posts: 19,264

    DDDenny
    Member
    from oregon

    Just to stir the pot, I dredged up the old 301/302 thread last night just in case there is some new found knowledge on the subject..............right!:rolleyes:

    https://www.jalopyjournal.com/forum...d-a-real-chevy-302.72531/page-8#post-12917972
     
  18. Other then the old argument that a 301 and a 302 are different (yea right same bore and stroke) there really isn't much to be said. If I owned a 302 (again) I certainly would not turn it into a 383, that is what junk 350s are for. LOL

    Now while we are on the subject if someone wants to donate a large journal 283 crank to my cause ('69 and later 302) I would certainly make my 355 into a 302 when I freshen it. But you can call it a 301 if it makes you happy. I am old and worn and still think that high rev cruising is a rush. :D
     
    scott27 and Tickety Boo like this.
  19. Bandit Billy
    Joined: Sep 16, 2014
    Posts: 12,373

    Bandit Billy
    ALLIANCE MEMBER

    I have a 330 but mine says FIREDOME on the covers. :cool:
     
  20. LOL those stickers are cheap. :D :D :D
     
  21. DDDenny
    Joined: Feb 6, 2015
    Posts: 19,264

    DDDenny
    Member
    from oregon

    When I was a kid my neighbor had a car with a 330 in it, pretty sure it wasn't a hemi though, I think he bought it from his uncles' Olds dealership, F-85 I think he called it.:D
     
    slowmotion and Bandit Billy like this.
  22. Tickety Boo
    Joined: Feb 2, 2015
    Posts: 1,619

    Tickety Boo
    Member
    from Wisconsin

    I call the 283 bored .125 a 301, the short stroked 327 a 302, just seems to make sense to me :rolleyes:
    Have been accumulating parts to build a nice a 302 but don't want to bend over for the pistons. :eek: Also want to run pump gas. Got a 327 block decked and .040 over ( so won't be a real 302:oops:) and a reground 283 crank. Pondering 350 flat top pistons with 6" rods, it would require taking off about .030 from the top of pistons to get 0 deck. Still have not priced every thing out to see what cost would be. Got other projects priority's. 1st.
     
    sunbeam likes this.
  23. sunbeam
    Joined: Oct 22, 2010
    Posts: 6,220

    sunbeam
    Member

    But Beaner Chevys 302 showed up One year before Fords.
     
  24. DDDenny
    Joined: Feb 6, 2015
    Posts: 19,264

    DDDenny
    Member
    from oregon

    Those few words are the most profound words in this whole thread!
     
  25. blownhemi48
    Joined: Nov 17, 2009
    Posts: 243

    blownhemi48
    Member
    from Bergen NY

    Jenkins used 350 pistons and 5.886 long aluminum ( Super Rods ) rods in his 331 cu. in. engines. He used the forged small journal 327 crankshaft in a large journal 350 block by honing the 350 main bearings out to accept the small journal 327 bearings.
     
  26. DDDenny
    Joined: Feb 6, 2015
    Posts: 19,264

    DDDenny
    Member
    from oregon

    Are you talking about the Vega Pro Stock engine?
     
    Last edited: Jan 20, 2019
  27. 56sedandelivery
    Joined: Nov 21, 2006
    Posts: 6,695

    56sedandelivery
    Member Emeritus

    ***It's just a matter of the math formula used to arrive at 301 VS 302; both are 4" bore with a 3" stroke, use 5.7" rods, and the same compression height pistons. In the "old days", pi was figured as 3.14, to arrive at a figure closer to 301; when pi is taken out a few more decimal points to 3.1415926535, it comes up closer to 302, and is rounded off. At least that is what I was told in my formative years. And, being a SBC, lots of parts can be mixed/matched/re-machined to arrive at just about any combination there is.*** I am Butch/56sedandelivery.
     
    Last edited: Jan 22, 2019
    Tickety Boo likes this.
  28. Not on paper. ;)
     
  29. blownhemi48
    Joined: Nov 17, 2009
    Posts: 243

    blownhemi48
    Member
    from Bergen NY

    Yes I am. I used to have his book.
     
  30. sunbeam
    Joined: Oct 22, 2010
    Posts: 6,220

    sunbeam
    Member

    I guess I don't understand not on paper, Camaro 302 Z28 1967 Ford 302 1968 and I'm not sure it was at the first of the year there were a lot of 1968 289 cars.
     

Share This Page

Register now to get rid of these ads!

Archive

Copyright © 1995-2021 The Jalopy Journal: Steal our stuff, we'll kick your teeth in. Terms of Service. Privacy Policy.

Atomic Industry
Forum software by XenForo™ ©2010-2014 XenForo Ltd.