Register now to get rid of these ads!

Technical Do you say Engine or Motor?

Discussion in 'The Hokey Ass Message Board' started by rockable, Dec 20, 2018.

  1. quicksilverart46
    Joined: Dec 7, 2016
    Posts: 460

    quicksilverart46
    Member

    That is a perfect description and true it is all in how it’s used in context.


    Sent from my iPhone using The H.A.M.B. mobile app
     
  2. foolthrottle
    Joined: Oct 14, 2005
    Posts: 1,404

    foolthrottle
    Member

  3. nochop
    Joined: Nov 13, 2005
    Posts: 3,837

    nochop
    Member
    from norcal

  4. Desmodromic
    Joined: Sep 25, 2010
    Posts: 571

    Desmodromic
    Member

    The overall record time for the Pikes Peak Hill Climb was recently set by a Volkswagen (!!), with only electric motors (!!!) for power. So, this discussion will be considered academic in a few decades, and your grandkids will not know what an "engine" is. (That traitor Don Garlits is closing in on 200 mph with his latest dragster, that goes "wwwhhhhhhrrrrrr.")

    Happy Motoring!
     

    Attached Files:

    egads and loudbang like this.
  5. ClarkH
    Joined: Jul 21, 2010
    Posts: 1,424

    ClarkH
    ALLIANCE MEMBER

    Blame the Brits! Per Wikipedia: " 'Motor car' is attested from 1895, and is the usual formal name for cars in British English."
     
    loudbang likes this.
  6. English language taught in the USA not British.:D
     
  7. Bechtel 56
    Joined: Jul 8, 2018
    Posts: 14

    Bechtel 56

    ' my mills running fine let's come off the line at sunset and vine'..

    Sent from my SM-G965U1 using The H.A.M.B. mobile app
     
    nochop likes this.
  8. mrchewie
    Joined: Oct 31, 2008
    Posts: 12

    mrchewie
    Member



    Sent from my SM-G930R4 using The H.A.M.B. mobile app
     
  9. Motors - electric, Engines - fuel
     
  10. Johnny Gee
    Joined: Dec 3, 2009
    Posts: 12,684

    Johnny Gee
    Member
    from Downey, Ca

    Some light may be shed with this copy and paste. Seems the motor replaced the horse where personal transport is involved.

    "AUTOMOBILE FIRSTS
    Inventor
    Date
    Type/Description
    Country

    Nicolas-Joseph Cugnot (1725-1804) 1769 STEAM / Built the first self propelled road vehicle (military tractor) for the French army: three wheeled, 2.5 mph. France
    Robert Anderson 1832-1839 ELECTRIC / Electric carriage. Scotland
    Karl Friedrich Benz (1844-1929) 1885/86 GASOLINE / First true automobile. Gasoline automobile powered by an internal combustion engine: three wheeled, four cycle, engine and chassis form a single unit. Germany Patent DRP No. 37435
    Gottlieb Wilhelm Daimler (1834-1900) and Wilhelm Maybach (1846-1929) 1886 GASOLINE / First four wheeled, four-stroke engine- known as the "Cannstatt-Daimler." Germany
    George Baldwin Selden (1846-1922) 1876/95 GASOLINE / Combined internal combustion engine with a carriage: patent no: 549,160 (1895). Never manufactured -- Selden collected royalties. United States
    Charles Edgar Duryea (1862-1938) and his brother Frank (1870-1967) 1893 GASOLINE / First successful gas powered car: 4hp, two-stroke motor. The Duryea brothers set up first American car manufacturing company. United States"
     
  11. Tyresmoke
    Joined: Apr 9, 2012
    Posts: 171

    Tyresmoke
    Member
    from Norfork

    Engine and Motor
    On the rare occasions we encounter one, we refer to a steam locomotive as an engine, the same word that we give to the motive power of an aircraft. But all electrical devices are driven by motors. In Britain at least, one’s personal transport is a motor car (with compounds such as motor trade, motor vehicle and motor sport), even though it’s always powered by an engine. Small boats may have outboard motors and then are often called motor boats.

    However, the propulsion device of a rocket can be called either a rocket motor or a rocket engine, and usage here seems not to have settled on one or the other. The IEEE Spectrum magazine for June 1998 (which Ron Jeffries has thoughtfully sent me) reports that the debate has been so intense, and yet so inconclusive, that some rocket scientist has coined the phrase whoosh generator as “the humorous, genderless, politically correct way to refer to the propulsion device in a hobby rocket, thus avoiding the great motor/engine debate”.

    In everyday, non-technical usage the words have much the same meaning. But they have such clearly defined and fixed compounds (except in the rocket case) that they can’t be thought of as entirely interchangeable. The magazine article argues that the difference is that engines contain their own fuel or are part of a highly integrated engine-fuel system, whereas a motor draws on externally supplied energy. That’s the rule given in the Oxford English Dictionary, but on reflection it seems not wholly satisfactory. It doesn’t work for outboard motor or rocket motor for example. And it doesn’t explain why the two words should have been applied in this way. For that we have to look into their history.

    Engine is from the Latin ingenium, which referred to one’s ability to create things, one’s native genius; it comes from a root meaning ‘create; beget’ from which we get words like genetic, and is also the source of ingenious and ingenuity (engineer derives from a related word). Its first meaning in English, from about the fourteenth century, was very much this one of mother wit or genius, a skill in devising things. It could also, by obvious extension, refer to the result of such ingenuity, a contrivance or device, particularly any mechanical apparatus. The term was very general; a sixteenth-century text directs that a person should be “put in the stocks or other such engine”; pulleys and their like were also engines (as in Swift’s Gulliver’s Travels of 1727: “With ropes and engines, I made a shift to turn it”). The British pub served its drink by means of beer engines, hand pumps which drew the brew up from casks in the cellar; blazes were extinguished with the help of fire engines, originally hand-operated pumps. In the 1670s one John Worlidge invented a machine for pulping apples in cidermaking; he termed his device the Ingenio, an obvious reference to the Latin original. Engine was commonly applied also to weapons of war, such as the siege engine and to devices such as snares for catching game (hence gin trap, where gin is a short form of engine that also turned up in compounds such as horse gin for a horse-powered windlass).

    It was an obvious enough extension to apply the word to the new devices that created power through steam. At first these were static units designed to pump water from mines, hugely complicated even in their early Newcomen incarnations. The steam engine was such an important machine, being one of the crucial developments of the Industrial Revolution, in particular making possible deep mines, that engine soon came to apply almost exclusively to it (being replaced in most other cases by machine, a word that earlier had meant almost the same as engine). And that usage came to influence later extensions of it, as in petrol and diesel engines: no longer just a contrivance, but a system for producing propulsive power.

    Incidentally, computer science has several terms that include engine, such as search engine, database engine and recognition engine. In all of them engine has the sense of a central part or kernel of a software application, hidden from the user, which does intensive ‘number-crunching’ work on data, only the results of which are made available. Charles Babbage named his Victorian mechanical computer the Analytical Engine, using the pre-Industrial-Revolution sense of the word. I would guess, in view of the almost iconic regard many computer scientists have for Babbage’s work, that the modern terms derive directly from this phrase.

    Motor had quite different origins, coming from the Latin movere, ‘to move’. It was first employed in English in the sense of ‘instigator’, or something that causes motion, often in a figurative sense, as of God as being the cause of the motion of the heavens. Even by the nineteenth century, it was still applied generally to the idea of something that caused change, without necessarily implying a mechanical device; for example the Civil Engineering Journal in 1839 said “The true motor of the system would ... be the weight of the atmosphere”, in which motor here is an agent or force (a sense which is still current). It was also applied early in the same century to classes of muscles or nerves whose job was to cause parts of the body to move. Only in the 1850s did it begin to be applied to a device that employed some source of energy to create movement, being applied first to the electric motor and to hydraulic devices.

    When the electric motor appeared, people saw a key difference between it and the steam engine. The latter had an obvious source of energy in its fuel; the source of energy of the former was less clear, being supplied mysteriously from a battery or generator by means of wires. Steam engines obviously consumed their fuel, but electrical and hydraulic devices extracted energy from some source without obviously consuming it. Perhaps this reminded people of the original sense of motor that referred to some intangible or spiritual force, and persuaded them to apply it to these new sources of power.

    By the time that vehicles driven by internal combustion engines had begun to appear in any numbers, at the very end of the century, both words had become well established in common usage. The driving force was obviously an engine, which consumed fuel to provide motive power. But why the conveyance as a whole was termed a motor vehicle is less obvious. The mere fact of it moving was obviously not sufficient; that was hardly a new idea, after all. It may be that it was a more elegant word, and also helpfully distinguished the automobile as a system from anything that belched steam and soot, such as the early steam-driven road vehicles like the Stanley Steamer.

    By the beginning of the twentieth century, the two words had moved together from very different origins, even though as we’ve seen, for historical reasons they were mostly employed in set compounds. But when new forms of propulsive device came along, analogy (or sometimes chance) decided which was to be applied in a particular case. Aeroplanes were obviously powered by engines, since the earliest ones were taken over directly from petrol engines of the kind that drove cars and lorries. Though there seems to be no clear evidence for the choice, perhaps outboard motor was so termed because it was a compact device that reminded its namers of electric motors.

    The confusion between rocket engine and rocket motor is less obvious. By analogy with other devices that consume fuel, it ought to be an engine, but perhaps by the time it came to be named motor had become so close a synonym that either felt right.


    Ref: http://www.worldwidewords.org/articles/engine.htm

    Sent from my SM-T805 using The H.A.M.B. mobile app
     
    Paul and egads like this.
  12. Tyresmoke
    Joined: Apr 9, 2012
    Posts: 171

    Tyresmoke
    Member
    from Norfork

    Hope that helps!

    Sent from my SM-T805 using The H.A.M.B. mobile app
     
    Truck64 likes this.
  13. Baumi
    Joined: Jan 28, 2003
    Posts: 3,046

    Baumi
    ALLIANCE MEMBER

    In German I call it a "Motor", in English " an engine". But mostly I call it a Nailhead, a flatty, a 327, a stovebolt or a Y-block.
    There you have it. That was easy.
     
    egads and scotty t like this.
  14. Baumi
    Joined: Jan 28, 2003
    Posts: 3,046

    Baumi
    ALLIANCE MEMBER

    ...plus: If it is giving me trouble I call it a " piece of s**t" , no matter of it's electric or not.
     
    jaw22w and egads like this.
  15. Onemansjunk
    Joined: Nov 30, 2008
    Posts: 318

    Onemansjunk
    Member
    from Modesto,CA

    This is why SHOP CLASS was invented!


    Sent from my iPad using The H.A.M.B. mobile app
     
    Truck64 likes this.
  16. Truck64
    Joined: Oct 18, 2015
    Posts: 5,325

    Truck64
    Member
    from Ioway

    Is there gonna be a test? Cuz the dog ate my homework, let's just get that shit outta the way right now.
     
  17. Ted Stahl
    Joined: Mar 11, 2017
    Posts: 5

    Ted Stahl

    I say both. Does the engine run? What size motor is it?

    Sent from my Moto G Play using The H.A.M.B. mobile app
     
  18. VANDENPLAS and Boneyard51 like this.
  19. partsdawg
    Joined: Feb 12, 2006
    Posts: 3,512

    partsdawg
    ALLIANCE MEMBER
    from Minnesota

    As usual the OCD types what to clock language.
    Call it what you want.
     
  20. tobias1954
    Joined: Feb 13, 2011
    Posts: 37

    tobias1954
    Member
    from Norway

    In a Napa store 30 years ago:
    Me: I need a set of engine mounts for my Dodge Aspen.
    Clerk: You mean motor mounts?
    Me: Yeah, I guess so.
    Clerk: What engine do you have?
    :confused:
     
  21. J. A. Miller
    Joined: Dec 30, 2010
    Posts: 2,064

    J. A. Miller
    ALLIANCE MEMBER
    from Central NY

    I think some of y'all need to switch to boxers! Wow
     
    wraymen likes this.
  22. 2FordGuy
    Joined: Apr 1, 2018
    Posts: 25

    2FordGuy

    bundoc bob and Tyresmoke like this.
  23. mountainman2
    Joined: Sep 16, 2013
    Posts: 337

    mountainman2
    Member

    just two quotes:

    "Do you say Engine or Motor?"

    "What difference, at this point, does it make?"
     
    egads likes this.
  24. Johnny Gee
    Joined: Dec 3, 2009
    Posts: 12,684

    Johnny Gee
    Member
    from Downey, Ca

    You say eether and I say eyether
    You say neether and I say nyther
    Eether, eyether, neether, nyther
    Let's call the whole thing off!
     
  25. jimgoetz
    Joined: Sep 6, 2013
    Posts: 517

    jimgoetz
    Member

  26. Lone Star Mopar
    Joined: Nov 2, 2005
    Posts: 3,838

    Lone Star Mopar
    Member

    I'd say if your concerned about such things you're setting yourself up to be irritated...alot.

    Sent from my SM-J727T1 using The H.A.M.B. mobile app
     
    egads and Bill's Auto Works like this.
  27. Frankie47
    Joined: Dec 20, 2008
    Posts: 1,877

    Frankie47
    Member
    from omaha ne.

    Power plant.......snicker, snicker....heheheheh.
     
  28. JC Sparks
    Joined: Dec 8, 2008
    Posts: 733

    JC Sparks
    Member
    from Ohio

    UPS just delivered my new electric engine for my engine lathe.
     
    quicksilverart46 likes this.
  29. I totally agree with your last statement,you would have perceived my last post as humerus as I had intended it to be had I posted the big grin emoji.:D HRP
     
    Last edited: Dec 22, 2018
  30. [​IMG]
     
    VANDENPLAS likes this.

Share This Page

Register now to get rid of these ads!

Archive

Copyright © 1995-2021 The Jalopy Journal: Steal our stuff, we'll kick your teeth in. Terms of Service. Privacy Policy.

Atomic Industry
Forum software by XenForo™ ©2010-2014 XenForo Ltd.