Register now to get rid of these ads!

Technical Frame boxing necessary?

Discussion in 'Traditional Hot Rods' started by Dad Was A Racer, Nov 25, 2018.

  1. Dad Was A Racer
    Joined: Oct 7, 2014
    Posts: 138

    Dad Was A Racer
    ALLIANCE MEMBER

    On a ‘39 Ford coupe with a spicy 276” 8BA, all original suspension, brakes, fenders, etc is boxing the frame necessary or recommended? Seems to be debatable on traditional cars not running OHV Hi-po motors, etc. It’s presently stripped to the bare frame, which is in pretty good shape with only one rusty spot that’s a little Swiss cheesed. Opinions?


    Sent from my iPad using H.A.M.B.
     
  2. Dick Stevens
    Joined: Aug 7, 2012
    Posts: 3,716

    Dick Stevens
    Member

  3. Mr48chev
    Joined: Dec 28, 2007
    Posts: 33,946

    Mr48chev
    ALLIANCE MEMBER

    I'd think not with the original suspension and not that much extra power.
     
  4. atch
    Joined: Sep 3, 2002
    Posts: 5,639

    atch
    Member


  5. spanners
    Joined: Feb 24, 2009
    Posts: 2,091

    spanners
    Member

    Then again, why not do it now while it's stripped. Save you doing it later if you decide to up the horsepower.
     
  6. Mart
    Joined: Mar 3, 2001
    Posts: 4,900

    Mart
    Member

    That frame has a hefty X member. What is sometimes needed in an A frame or 32 frame is not required in the later frames.

    So no, in my opinion it does not require boxing.
     
    1934coupe and Hnstray like this.
  7. G-son
    Joined: Dec 19, 2012
    Posts: 1,291

    G-son
    Member
    from Sweden

    If you multiply the engine max torque with the lowest gear ratio you get the torque that the transmission puts out, and applies to the engine/transmission mounts and rear axle mounts (not counting temporary peaks from dumping the clutch etc.). It would be interesting to see how much the frame twists if that amount of torque is applied to it. Not very hard, just strap one end down and use a lever of appropriate length with the right weight on the end to twist the frame.
     
  8. no mention of blackbeard,....
    Oh how this place has changed.
     
    The37Kid likes this.
  9. sloppy jalopies
    Joined: Jun 29, 2015
    Posts: 5,256

    sloppy jalopies
    Member

    x3...
    building an 11ga., '30 on a '32 frame, going to get a slightly warmed 302...
    I will box about 2 feet under the hood/cowl seam and the flat to kick up in the rear...
    I also slide the bottom edge of the boxing plate inward about 3/8", leaving a flange where I can attach a cable, wire or tube later on when I can't get a drill in there,
    I don't fear the 302 motor twisting anything... $0.02.
     
  10. 41rodderz
    Joined: Sep 27, 2010
    Posts: 6,541

    41rodderz
    Member
    from Oregon

    Of course there is two ways about it. But I am thinking spanners way is most appropriate. Let's add that metal fatigues and your frame is going on its 80th birthday. It all ready has who knows how many years and that frame being beaten on the roads. There is no better time than in your present situation to get the added benefit of boxing the frame. You never know the future for what engine will be the next one after the 276er. You do not want to fart around boxing with body, engine ,drive train, brake /fuel/electrical and have to remove it. You do not say where the Swiss cheese area is but make sure that area hasn't tweaked your chassis.
     
    nunattax and lothiandon1940 like this.
  11. You noticed that too??????
     
    cadillacoffin likes this.
  12. Dad Was A Racer
    Joined: Oct 7, 2014
    Posts: 138

    Dad Was A Racer
    ALLIANCE MEMBER

    I agree with both sides of the argument. The motor will never be anything but a flathead as long as I live/own the car, so the "more horsepower" issue warrants boxing it. However, I understand that it's old, and probably had a lot of hard miles on it, so it may need a little structural help. I'm going to put it on screw jacks today and measure it out for square/level to see how straight it actually is.

    IF I decide to box it, has anyone used this kit?

    http://www.wolfesmetalfabrication.com/3540fordboxingplates.html

    I see that he introduced his kits here quite a few years ago so I'm guessing there's some first-hand opinions on them by now?
     
    dirty old man and lothiandon1940 like this.
  13. ididntdoit1960
    Joined: Dec 13, 2011
    Posts: 1,030

    ididntdoit1960
    Member
    from Western MA

    first thing I thought of when I saw the thread title.....wasn't it bluebeard
     
  14. I believe it was BLUEBEAR,what a maroon.

    The 35 to 4o frames really don't need boxing with a flathead. HRP
     
    RICH B, i.rant, VANDENPLAS and 3 others like this.
  15. lake_harley
    Joined: Jun 4, 2017
    Posts: 2,170

    lake_harley
    Member

    OK....I give up. Who or what is this blackbeard, bluebeard or bluebear of which you speak?

    Lynn
     
    56shoebox and 56don like this.
  16. oldsman41
    Joined: Jun 25, 2010
    Posts: 1,556

    oldsman41
    Member

    Nope if the frame has got everything in place you should be good to go.
     
  17. razoo lew
    Joined: Apr 11, 2017
    Posts: 536

    razoo lew
    Member
    from Calgary

     
  18. No one has mentioned the Fact that the Frame is already a Double rail frame as in a frame inside a frame. If that part is all healthy and you think about it, it's already Boxed just not on the inboard edge. Adding more is a waste of time.
    The Wizzard
     
    The37Kid, Andy, TagMan and 8 others like this.
  19. junkman8888
    Joined: Jan 28, 2009
    Posts: 1,035

    junkman8888
    Member

    The '35-'40 frame is a vast improvement in strength and rigidity over earlier frames, unfortunately Ford failed to reverse the flanges on the X member so the front and rear legs could form actual "boxing plates", as it is those front and rear legs fit down inside the frame which lends almost no strength to twisting but the two layers of metal provide an outstanding place for rust to start. If the web of your frame is bubbled from rust between the layers the only solution is to disassemble the frame, sandblast and repair the frame rails then re-assemble.
     
  20. 34Larry
    Joined: Apr 25, 2011
    Posts: 1,736

    34Larry
    Member

    My experience with my 34. Built the first time in 55/56 with four Stromberg/cam DeSoto hemi, the coupe was weighing in at the bottom of the "B" Gas Class, cranking on 104 with a 13.0 e.t. Campaigned all threw out the PNW for quite a few years.
    I rebuilt it starting in '95 and was totally amazed to find the frame had never been boxed. Not only that but some dumb ass cut the transmission cross member out, (left the tail shaft waving in the wind), when removing the hemi that he bought the car for and installed a 302/ four speed, (with the tail shaft STILL waving in the wind.) Well I fully expected to find that it was so far out of square, (rack) and twisted that it would need a lot of work or replacement. Again to my surprise it was less than a quarter inch out of rack and no twist. The car has always been driver and from what I can find out it had bee that way for some 10 years or so. Having been a shop ironworker, fitter/welder for my early life it was no challenge to just get-er-done. If it took all that with the DeSoto, I'm sure yours can get by without boxing.
    It might be nice though for the next guy that wants to drop a monster motor in it. Hope that helps you some.
     
    loudbang likes this.
  21. weemark
    Joined: Sep 1, 2002
    Posts: 830

    weemark
    Member
    from scotland

    you would be wasting time and money boxing a 39 frame to stick a stock or hot flattie back in it. The chassis will be absolutely fine. even with a mild sbc it would be absolutely fine.
     
    1934coupe, Andy and Pist-n-Broke like this.
  22. dirty old man
    Joined: Feb 2, 2008
    Posts: 8,910

    dirty old man
    Member Emeritus

    If I was damn sure that I'd never put anything in the car more powerful than a flathead in it, all I'd do is cut out that area you mentioned was "swiss cheesed" and weld in some good metal there. Then treat the whole thing to a good cleaning and rustproof paint like POR15 or similar. But do pay close attention to the sandwiched areas as mentioned in post #19.
     
    Last edited: Nov 26, 2018
  23. Gearhead Graphics
    Joined: Oct 4, 2008
    Posts: 3,890

    Gearhead Graphics
    Member
    from Denver Co

    If its apart and stripped down and has a rusty spot, and you're asking the question, why not just go ahead and do it? Might not NEED to be done, but then its out of the way, you don't have to worry, and if you go with a big motor some other day one step is already finished
     
  24. Bruce Lancaster
    Joined: Oct 9, 2001
    Posts: 21,681

    Bruce Lancaster
    Member Emeritus

    Another thing...by '39 the body, especially cowl and rear body, added substantial stiffness.
    On the '34 mentioned, I believe the X member was not a full-length frame doubler as in '35 up Fords.
     
    scullandcrossspaners likes this.
  25. Can you do the work yourself? (Stupid question but I have to ask)
    What’s the kit you posted worth?
    Does not look to difficult to make those pieces yourself either.

    If it were me, ( and it’s not) I would box it, it’s an 80 year old frame that’s been beat down, probably fixed and welded along the way, needs some “Swiss cheese “ fixed anyways. It’s safer, better and you know it’s done.

    A screaming motor might fall in your lap one day and flathead be damn! You’ll stuff some horse power between those frame rails.

    Just food for thought.
     
    Last edited: Nov 26, 2018
  26. 41rodderz
    Joined: Sep 27, 2010
    Posts: 6,541

    41rodderz
    Member
    from Oregon

    Remember hindsight is 20/20 . If you ever detonate that block then what are you going to do? Do it now while it is easy and then you have stought chassis and no future worries. Being reactive instead of proactive will have old Murphy's law laughing long and loud at you.
     
    lothiandon1940 likes this.
  27. Mart
    Joined: Mar 3, 2001
    Posts: 4,900

    Mart
    Member

    For what it is worth, Bruce, the 33/34 frames do have the x member legs extending forward and rearward to strengthen the frame. At least as far as the front and rear crossmembers, beyond at the front, not sure at the rear. (Would have to look). The inner channel fits snug against the outer rail.
    The 35-40 frames are slightly better as the two channels, although not reversed to create a box like on the 42 up frames, the two walls are about 1/4" apart, which may increase stiffness.

    Mart.
     
    1934coupe likes this.
  28. Bluebear ( Chad Geary) was a kid that was offered a free ride that he could build in Coddingtons shop but the only stipulation was the Model A frame had to be boxed for safety sake, he refused to do it and lost the free car & his smart mouth cost him his job, I don't speak ill of the dead and wasn't a huge fan of BC but he built some nice cars before he got famous.

    Someone gonna to pay for my car & I'll build it like they want. HRP
     
    nunattax, GuyW and VANDENPLAS like this.
  29. Bandit Billy
    Joined: Sep 16, 2014
    Posts: 12,363

    Bandit Billy
    ALLIANCE MEMBER

    This. They call him the Wizzard for good reason.
     
    Pist-n-Broke likes this.

Share This Page

Register now to get rid of these ads!

Archive

Copyright © 1995-2021 The Jalopy Journal: Steal our stuff, we'll kick your teeth in. Terms of Service. Privacy Policy.

Atomic Industry
Forum software by XenForo™ ©2010-2014 XenForo Ltd.