Register now to get rid of these ads!

History the "wonderfull" chevy v8?

Discussion in 'The Hokey Ass Message Board' started by birdman1, Sep 11, 2018.

  1. birdman1
    Joined: Dec 6, 2012
    Posts: 1,593

    birdman1
    Member

    I was just thinking awhile back how the wonderfull(and it truly is) little chevy v8 engine. But when it first came out in 1955, it wasn't all that great. i remember my uncle telling the story, if you locked the hoods closed on a new Ford and a new Chevy, and headed out to California (we lived in Iowa), that the Chevy would not make it. the new v8 used oil, lots of it. the crankshaft harmonic dampner would fly loose since there was no bolt to hold it on! the camshafts went flat , the valve guides wore out ,causing oil consuption and lots or pretty blue smoke out the tailpipe when first started.
    BUT, they were fast(power packs anyhow) and that makes up for any problems! Kinda like our lovely wives.
     
  2. BJR
    Joined: Mar 11, 2005
    Posts: 9,915

    BJR
    Member

    "the new v8 used oil, lots of it. Kinda like our lovely wives."
    Your wife uses lots of oil?:p
     
  3. slowmotion
    Joined: Nov 21, 2011
    Posts: 3,330

    slowmotion
    Member

    Imagine that.
     
    Deuces likes this.
  4. zzford
    Joined: May 5, 2005
    Posts: 1,823

    zzford
    Member

    I prefer GM products myself, but it often seems like GM releases his newest engineering to the public before it's worked out all the bugs.
     

  5. DDDenny
    Joined: Feb 6, 2015
    Posts: 19,265

    DDDenny
    Member
    from oregon

    I'd rather push a Chevy than drive a......................:rolleyes:
     
    mad mikey, Deuces, Torkwrench and 5 others like this.
  6. RmK57
    Joined: Dec 31, 2008
    Posts: 2,694

    RmK57
    Member

    It would surely last longer if you had to push it all the time.;)
     
    Deuces, classiccarjack and Texas Webb like this.
  7. Deuces
    Joined: Nov 3, 2009
    Posts: 23,920

    Deuces

    Insert your brand here..>
     
  8. stubbsrodandcustom
    Joined: Dec 28, 2010
    Posts: 2,303

    stubbsrodandcustom
    ALLIANCE MEMBER
    from Spring tx

    You hit the reason they were widely used in hotrods in the late 50s and up..... burnt oil, had mechanical issues, tons ended up pulled or junked. So it was basically was a "cheap" engine that had some power. Not much has changed in over 60 years has it?
     
    classiccarjack and Hnstray like this.
  9. [​IMG]
    There's actually an oil spot under this one.
     
    302GMC, LOU WELLS, Stogy and 2 others like this.
  10. Just for a moment, look that lot over and try to imagine what the cost of chrome plating would be in today's market.
     
    mad mikey, Deuces, belair and 2 others like this.
  11. 2935ford
    Joined: Jan 6, 2006
    Posts: 3,843

    2935ford
    Member

    Also remember in 1932 when Ford released the V8 flathead........it wasn't much better.
    An awful lot of customers were very disappointed. Burning oil and other issues took awhile for Ford to sort out.
    No recalls back then just the poor service department having to replace or fix the issues.
     
  12. same design 55-86 or could be argued 1955-2003.
    must of done something right.
     
  13. Bruce Lancaster
    Joined: Oct 9, 2001
    Posts: 21,681

    Bruce Lancaster
    Member Emeritus

    The SBC got bad press for about three weeks...flimsy rockers, too light to be sturdy, etc.
    The someone noticed the things went fast and obviously produced more power in comparison to size and ratings than about anything else, and were as a bonus all but perfectly interchangeable with the Ford flathead.
    Olds and Cadillac wrecks were suddenly no longer prize property at the junkyard...those motors suddenly started looking dated and fat, and though they were huge in displacement were sort of under achievers.
    Used Chevy V8s were almost unobtainable for a long time, and when desperate rodders turned to new replacement engines GM thottled back the supply in order to keep enough engines in the legitimate dealer parts food chain.
    As supply caught up, each new step caused a repeat of this feeding frenzy...the 283 and later the 327 went through exactly the same experience.
    The total effect rapidly reduced the really desirable hotrod engine supply to just two. Unless you needed and could afford a 392, the Chevy had become the only really desirable engine. Ford and lesser mopar engines were second choices, used mostly because they were more available and cheaper.
    In the modified classes Chevies never dethroned the 392, but came startlingly close given the huge displacement difference. In the stock classes Chevies soon had to be assigned new horsepower ratings, because the advertised power ratings on the Chevies were conservative and about all others very optimistic.
     
  14. There’s a reason it lasted basically unchanged ( improved) but unchanged for around 50 years.

    I’m sure the first few years had some growing pains, anything new usually dose.

    Think about how much complete garbage rolled off the big three’s assembly lines in the 80’s with the big change to unibody, fuel injection, front wheel drive, computer controls ... etc,etc. Not saying this was not all done in the past but it was a lot of change all at once.

    Even now after building cars for over 100 years, the oems can still poke them selves in the eye with there own finger!

    Lots of issues still with new high compression direct fuel injection engines burning oil and falling apart, cvt tranny’s exploding, shitty brake designs, shitty awd designs the list goes on and on. Only way to make progress is to fuck up and do better.
     
    mad mikey, Deuces, Surf City and 5 others like this.
  15. Jalopy Joker
    Joined: Sep 3, 2006
    Posts: 31,262

    Jalopy Joker
    Member

    had a '55 Chevy with 265 - never had the problems discussed here - had '56 Ford with 312 that smoked a lot and had problems with top end not getting enough oil
     
  16. DDDenny
    Joined: Feb 6, 2015
    Posts: 19,265

    DDDenny
    Member
    from oregon

    Keep in mind; I've never been a 6 cyl kind of guy, please no cards or letters, you know who you are. :D
    I wasn't of driving age in 1955, was actually still in sh!//y diapers but I'd bet those first 265's and their oil issues weren't a big deal for anyone that was anticipating trading in their 54 (and earlier) Chevys, leaving those anemic 6 cylinder days behind them.
     
  17. 56Don -
    This was the 50 millionth Chevrolet. 600 + trim parts on this particular Bel Air wer plated in 24 carat gold. Built Nov 23rd 1954 at the Van Slyke Road assembly plant.
    That'll break the 'ol chrome budget! It probably leaked. A friend had a '55 block. No oil filter pad.
     
    Last edited: Sep 11, 2018
    mad mikey, Deuces, 302GMC and 2 others like this.
  18. BigDogSS
    Joined: Jan 8, 2009
    Posts: 979

    BigDogSS
    Member
    from SoCal

    The Small Block Chevrolet was pretty damn good from the get-go. There is a reason for it's popularity. The "no bolt in the harmonic balancer" issue must not have been an issue, because they were pressed-on for at least the first 12 years of SBC production. With that said, I did have an issue with one coming loose, but I blame is on the crappy rebuild quality of the engine, rather than design. And yes, I did add a bolt ;-)
     
    mad mikey, Deuces and jchav62 like this.
  19. Baumi
    Joined: Jan 28, 2003
    Posts: 3,046

    Baumi
    ALLIANCE MEMBER

    I have a 56 312 in my 34... The top end oiling is inadequate to put it kindly- only the oil that makes it past the center cam bearing and up through the block and heads into the open rockershafts is supposed to lubricate BOTH heads. I put plugs in the rocker shafts and hope the oil will stay there long enough to not ruin the valve train in a short period of time. I built small and big Chevs too and think they are a way better design. Ford should just have made better heads for the Y , the bottom ends are great in my opinion. Instead they started to design several new engine families where no parts interchange, which have each their own design flaws and that ain´t any better than the Chevy design. Probably the first Chevy V8 wasn´t flawless, but they did not make the mistake to toss their design over board and start all over.
     
    mad mikey, Deuces, belair and 2 others like this.
  20. Bruce Lancaster
    Joined: Oct 9, 2001
    Posts: 21,681

    Bruce Lancaster
    Member Emeritus

    "no bolt in the harmonic balancer" issue apparently had nothing to do with holding the balancer on...presumably flying balancers weren't a problem.
    The bolt was added a short time into the production of the 350 engine (I had an early one...1969? 1968?) with no bolt or hole.) The bolt was to tension the front stub against some sort of harmonic failure problem, according to the SBC history book. It may not have been entirely a problem of the 350 crank, as that was a time when they went to extended pump and three rows of pulleys driving a massive array of accessories presumably adding heavy drive load.
     
  21. Gold plated huh? Man, and I thought that chrome would be expensive now! I did not know that, can't tell in black and white photo.
    Any idea of its whereabouts now?
     
    Deuces, Stogy and chevy57dude like this.
  22. [​IMG]


    This is an attempt to copy the vid. I may have failed. The car's location is presently unknown.
     
  23. BuckeyeBuicks
    Joined: Jan 4, 2010
    Posts: 2,709

    BuckeyeBuicks
    Member
    from ohio

    Ford and Mopar engines do have a purpose, I use them for weight in the back of my pick up in the winter time, I have to tie them down really well so the Chevy engine's torque doesn't throw them out the back;)
     
    jaw22w, mad mikey, Torkwrench and 9 others like this.
  24. DDDenny
    Joined: Feb 6, 2015
    Posts: 19,265

    DDDenny
    Member
    from oregon

    By my memory the first small block using the harmonic balancer retention bolt was the 64 Corvette 327's with the 365, 375 hp engine.
    The 65/up L79 in the Corvette, Nova and Chevelle had it also.
    This is my 327/350 hp engine for my Nova, NOS crank was new in box.

    20170226_145049.jpg


     
    mad mikey, 302GMC, Deuces and 2 others like this.
  25. Chevy used no crank bolt for how long in the 6’s ??
    30 or 40 years !!


    Shit Mercedes has crank bolt and balances failing on some of there v8’s benzes answer to that one?? New crank shaft and bolt at $17,000 dollars :eek:
    Not a rebuild, just a crank and bolt !!!

    A SBC looks like a champ motor right about now with most of the garbage out there now a days
     
    Baumi, mad mikey and Deuces like this.
  26. 28 Ford PU
    Joined: Jan 9, 2015
    Posts: 464

    28 Ford PU
    Member
    from Upstate NY

    I feel sorry for the SBC fans. They can't find a cool Chevy body to put it in.


    Sent from my iPad using H.A.M.B.
     
  27. I’ve said it before and I’ll say it forever, the Small Block Chevrolet is the absolutely greatest engine ever built, period, hands down. No other engine is so universal, so easy to work on, or makes so much power for such little money.


    Sent from my iPhone using The H.A.M.B. mobile app
     
  28. huh?
     
    Deuces, Torkwrench, TFoch and 4 others like this.
  29. Bandit Billy
    Joined: Sep 16, 2014
    Posts: 12,375

    Bandit Billy
    ALLIANCE MEMBER

    From the title I thought this was going to be about big blocks. Color me disappointed. :(
     
    Deuces, Kan Kustom and LOU WELLS like this.

Share This Page

Register now to get rid of these ads!

Archive

Copyright © 1995-2021 The Jalopy Journal: Steal our stuff, we'll kick your teeth in. Terms of Service. Privacy Policy.

Atomic Industry
Forum software by XenForo™ ©2010-2014 XenForo Ltd.