Register now to get rid of these ads!

Technical Looking for opinions in rear springs

Discussion in 'The Hokey Ass Message Board' started by ShortyLaVen, Feb 14, 2018.

?
  1. Standard

    50.0%
  2. Heavy duty

    25.0%
  3. Station wagon

    25.0%
  1. ShortyLaVen
    Joined: Oct 13, 2008
    Posts: 680

    ShortyLaVen
    Member

    Hello! I'm getting ready to buy new springs for the rear of my '60 Biscayne, but I'm having a hard time deciding what to get. I'm tired of the drive line rub, time it takes to swap rear wheels, and all the other headaches of having the rear low. The car as two coils cut all around right now, and I'm planning on keeping the front low (I like the look of a good rake just as much as I like em real low). My options are the standard, heavy duty, or station springs. They are all within ten bucks of each other.

    Standard: 16.84" free height, 11" compressed, 276 spring rate

    Heavy duty: 16.44 free height, 11" compressed, 370 spring rate

    Wagon: 17.12" free height, 11.25" compressed, 499 rate

    I know a lot of guys say to go with wagon springs, but I'm unsure if that would be too stiff for the car. What do you guys think? I will also be adding air shocks in the near future, so it is also a factor in my decision. IMG_20170922_182851119.jpg
     
  2. Blue One
    Joined: Feb 6, 2010
    Posts: 11,462

    Blue One
    ALLIANCE MEMBER
    from Alberta

    I had a 66 Chevy 4 door.
    Really nice car but weak rear springs.
    I got a pair of station wagon springs from a 66 wagon at the salvage yard and it was a huge improvement.

    The ride and ride height was perfect and you could actually carry a decent load in the big trunk.
     
  3. Moriarity
    Joined: Apr 11, 2001
    Posts: 31,159

    Moriarity
    SUPER MODERATOR
    Staff Member

    I think standard. remember what it sat like before you cut the coils? It may be even higher than that with brand new std springs. they will eventually settle some but it takes time. I think wagon springs would put the rear bumper on the moon. maybe air shocks with the current springs are the answer
     
    Nailhead Jason likes this.
  4. David Gersic
    Joined: Feb 15, 2015
    Posts: 2,734

    David Gersic
    Member
    from DeKalb, IL


  5. ShortyLaVen
    Joined: Oct 13, 2008
    Posts: 680

    ShortyLaVen
    Member

    That's a good point, maybe I should do air shocks first and then springs later if I feel like I need the extra spring height. Here's a pic of the car with the stock coils in the rear (albeit they were pretty sacked out) with cut coils in front. This pic also has 215/75R14s in back, and I'm running 235/75R15s now, so that adds about an extra 3/4 to 1 inch to the rake right there... Screenshot_20180214-223033~2.png
     
  6. Kerrynzl
    Joined: Jun 20, 2010
    Posts: 2,969

    Kerrynzl
    Member

    Stock ride height, and really fat wheels all round. Plus front and rear sway bars
    It will handle and look good.

    A 1960 Nascar theme , before they went to that "Tupperware Look"
     

Share This Page

Register now to get rid of these ads!

Archive

Copyright © 1995-2021 The Jalopy Journal: Steal our stuff, we'll kick your teeth in. Terms of Service. Privacy Policy.

Atomic Industry
Forum software by XenForo™ ©2010-2014 XenForo Ltd.