Register now to get rid of these ads!

Hot Rods Hedman Hedders info wanted

Discussion in 'The Hokey Ass Message Board' started by PBRmeASAP, Mar 5, 2017.

  1. Sitting here digging through a repop 1963 Moon catalog and looking at the old hedman hedders pictures, wondering what the dimensions are of these old headers....so does anyone have an actual Hedman catalog that may have this info? Looking at the older style that were two piece...4 into 2, 2 into 1.
    Slowly rebuilding my dad's old 32, and he thinks they had something like that on it, but it's 50+ years ago so he doesn't remember what.

    [​IMG]
     
  2. Give chris a call. He might be able to help you out. Its worth asking if he will bend up a new set. 20170305_204903.jpg
     
    loudbang likes this.
  3. here is a photo of the ones my dad bought back then. the one on the left has been modified to clear the steering box DSCF3844.JPG
     
  4. more photos: DSCF3917.JPG DSCF4076.JPG DSCF4077.JPG DSCF4078.JPG DSCF4079.JPG DSCF4146.JPG DSCF4148.JPG
     
    loudbang and kidcampbell71 like this.

  5. jnaki
    Joined: Jan 1, 2015
    Posts: 9,369

    jnaki

    Hello PRB,
    We had similar ones on our 292 671 SBC in 1960, they were only the 4 into one and that led below and under the car. We had a local muffler shop add legal pipes and tube mufflers bolted on under the car. When we raced, those pipes/mufflers were disconnected or removed. There were some clearance issues that the muffler shop heat altered for a smooth fit in our 40 Willys C/Gas coupe.
    Jnaki
    upload_2017-3-6_6-15-18.png
     
    bchctybob likes this.
  6. dechrome
    Joined: Dec 23, 2004
    Posts: 303

    dechrome
    Member

    The Heddman method of grouping two cylinders together was ment to help scavenge exhaust gas better than 4 into 1 styles.
    Hot Rod had articles on them in the day.
    I built a set of outside headers to duplicate that style, installed on an A roadster.
    deChrome
    IMG_0884.JPG
     
    loudbang likes this.
  7. bchctybob
    Joined: Sep 18, 2011
    Posts: 5,243

    bchctybob
    Member

    Dimensionally, most of those early Chevy headers from Hedman had 1 1/2" O.D. tubing for the primary tubes. Some of the two piece models had 1 1/2" primaries and the lower section was 1 5/8", or 1 5/8" primary tubes and a 1 3/4" lower section (an early version of "step" headers) although again, this was done mainly to facilitate installation. The flange material was 1/4" x 2" hot rolled steel. The flanges were drilled in stacks of 6, in a drill jig, with a drill press and the ports were cut out using industrial grade hole saws. In those days Hedman was more concerned with making a header that fit well and than with maximum performance. The tubing was Oxy/Acetylene welded and the flanges were welded with arc welders sometimes using Oxy/Acetylene rod as additional filler. The flanges were surfaced on large horizontal belt sanders.
    I started working there about the time they realized that they needed to join the swing to 4 tube headers to keep up with their competitors. I was recruited from Cyclone Headers (where equal length high performance oriented headers were the norm) to assist with the transition.
    A huge number of the old design headers were returned and scrapped during my first few years there. Who knew they would someday be desirable again.
    I hope this helps.
     
    loudbang, falcongeorge, lewk and 6 others like this.
  8. Bob,
    interesting info, do yo know if they ever made a list of the dimensions? For me i need to be 4 1/4" or less from the head surface/mountings surface to the outer tube. I only have 4 1/2" total width there, head surface to frame rail.
     
  9. bchctybob
    Joined: Sep 18, 2011
    Posts: 5,243

    bchctybob
    Member

    I sold the last set I had rescued years ago so I don't have any on hand to measure, but I'm pretty sure that the headers would fit into that space. Maybe some of the other guys who still have them could measure for you.
    What chassis/engine combo do you have. Can you post some pictures?
     
  10. i will take some measurements. you need from the head straight out? and ?
     
  11. not sure if this is a really good usable pic......
    [​IMG]
    [​IMG]
    if you measure from top of the frame rail to the cyl head it's 4 1/2".
    Stock 32 frame, stock 32 body....but it's a Chevy. Not sure if this helps much, but really need something better that cheesy block hugger headers
     
  12. What you are talking about is what is commonly known as a Tri Y header. The concept is to pair cylinders based on firing order to give a break between exhaust pulses. This tends to increase torque and broaden the powerband, especially on motors that aren't too radical cam timing wise. But the early Hedman headers shown in the original Post are Not true Tri Y's - they are just paired together for packaging reasons, like bchctybob said they were more concerned with fit than power. A true Tri Y for a small block Chevy will pair 1 & 5 and 3 & 7 on the left side and 2 & 4 and 6 & 8 on the right side. You will notice that the Hedman's don't pair the left side correctly for the Tri Y advantage. The Shelby GT350 was probably the first mass produced True Tri Y that worked and took advantage of the potential gains. Doug Thorley (Doug's Headers) was the biggest and most successful proponent of Tri Y's for the street and racing. Jack Burns is about the foremost authority on header design and flow in the world, having done headers for everything from Formula 1 to NASCAR and everything in between and here's what he says about them “For just about everyone running an American V-8 on the street, the Tri-Y design is almost always optimal for overall power production.” Yet they remain a hard sell in the market place .....
     
    loudbang and falcongeorge like this.
  13. thats in a 33 chevy, by the way. frames should be real close to the same width.
     
    loudbang likes this.
  14. yah, now to try and find something simular
     
  15. falcongeorge
    Joined: Aug 26, 2010
    Posts: 18,341

    falcongeorge
    Member
    from BC

    I was going to add the info on the tube sizes, but Bob got there first!
     
  16. falcongeorge
    Joined: Aug 26, 2010
    Posts: 18,341

    falcongeorge
    Member
    from BC

    Yup.
     
  17. bchctybob
    Joined: Sep 18, 2011
    Posts: 5,243

    bchctybob
    Member

    What Hotroddon said about the pairing is correct and I believe it was mostly a manufacturing/packaging decision. At the time those were designed most headers were more of a "tubing manifold" than a true performance designed part.
    I've always been a big fan of well executed Tri-Ys for street cars but when 4-tube headers became the norm on the our racing hero's cars, Tri-Ys became a hard sell. I think in the 15 years I had my custom header shop I only did 3 sets.
    For the OP, I don't think that the old HCH-1 style header is any better than Chevy's Ram Horn design as far as performance goes, but they are prettier.
     
    loudbang likes this.
  18. falcongeorge
    Joined: Aug 26, 2010
    Posts: 18,341

    falcongeorge
    Member
    from BC

    I think they are probably somewhat better than the rams horns, but not a lot.
     
  19. bchctybob
    Joined: Sep 18, 2011
    Posts: 5,243

    bchctybob
    Member

    Just a bit more interesting Hedman History. Those old headers were really all hand made. There were templates that the assembler used to mark a pre-bent tubes. He then used Wiss M2 tin snips mounted to a floor stand to cut along the marked lines. The flange was loaded into the fixture along with the 4 pre-bent primary pipes. The pipes were marked and trimmed and the transitions fit-checked. Once everything fit, the flanges were tack welded and the transition area tack welded. With a toggle-clamp holding the outlet in place, the flange was welded up. Then the header was removed from the main fixture (with the flange still attached to a stiffener to prevent warping) and placed in a rudimentary articulated fixture so the assembler could position the header to Oxy-Acetylene weld the transitions. Whew..... and that's just one side.
    Needless to say, they couldn't continue to hand make every part number and survive in the header business. With some initial reluctance, we made the change to mostly 4-tube designs which are much less labor intensive. My job was to create the prototypes, fit-check the prototypes on all intended applications, build all the jigs and fixtures required for all stages of manufacturing and evaluate the process and make any changes required to speed up the processes.
    Oh yeah, I got to build all the custom headers for our sponsored cars (the fun part!)
     
    loudbang and tb33anda3rd like this.
  20. they sure do look nice. DSCF4269.JPG
     
    kidcampbell71 and loudbang like this.
  21. bchctybob
    Joined: Sep 18, 2011
    Posts: 5,243

    bchctybob
    Member

    Yeah, they're just the thing for a period build. I still have a few of the compound bends that were used for the front and rear primary pipes. They were made with a poured lead clamp block so they could get the bends that close together. Yep, I made tooling for the old Pines benders too....ugh.
    I re-created some for my '31 Tudor. Strange at it seems, it cost just about the same to "flash chrome" them as they wanted to coat them. Of course, I went with chrome.....

    sedan82013 002.jpg sedan82013 003.jpg
     
    loudbang and kidcampbell71 like this.
  22. I've always loved the looks of the early Hedmans. Using a set on my latest '32 roadster build.

    20161119_125002.jpg 20161119_125419.jpg .
     
    loudbang likes this.
  23. Rocket (GuyOnThe HAMB) has a couple pair of the two piece ones. If you want I can get some dimensions if you still need them. He is making them fit on his 283ci in a Model A truck.
     
    loudbang and PBRmeASAP like this.
  24. If ya could that would be awesome! Rocket as in Ryan?
     
    loudbang likes this.
  25. guyontheHAMB
    Joined: Oct 1, 2006
    Posts: 73

    guyontheHAMB
    Member
    from chicago

    loudbang and PBRmeASAP like this.
  26. if it's easier, just send them up here and i can get the measurements :)
     
    loudbang likes this.
  27. bchctybob
    Joined: Sep 18, 2011
    Posts: 5,243

    bchctybob
    Member

    Those two piece ones are nice. I used to see them every now and then at swap meets but I haven't seen any in a long time. You're lucky to have them, and they seem to be in great shape for being so old.
     
    loudbang likes this.
  28. guyontheHAMB
    Joined: Oct 1, 2006
    Posts: 73

    guyontheHAMB
    Member
    from chicago

    I finally got a chance to get some pictures of the headers I have. The white ones were from a '57 Chevrolet from back in the 60's. I imagine that was the original fitment application. I put them on my Model A but they didn't leave enough ground clearance.
    The black headers are the ones I'm using on my Model A. I'm not sure the original application for those. I needed to narrow them about 5/8 of an inch to clear the hood sides. The extensions don't work with the fenders and running boards so I will have to make new ones in the original style.
    [​IMG][​IMG][​IMG]


    Sent from my iPhone using The H.A.M.B. mobile app
     
    PBRmeASAP, bowie and tb33anda3rd like this.

Share This Page

Register now to get rid of these ads!

Archive

Copyright © 1995-2021 The Jalopy Journal: Steal our stuff, we'll kick your teeth in. Terms of Service. Privacy Policy.

Atomic Industry
Forum software by XenForo™ ©2010-2014 XenForo Ltd.