Register now to get rid of these ads!

Technical Can someone explain to me how these friction shocks work?

Discussion in 'The Hokey Ass Message Board' started by evintho, May 15, 2015.

  1. evintho
    Joined: May 28, 2007
    Posts: 2,378

    evintho
    Member

    Picked 'em up from Ron Pope Motorsports. I thought there'd be some sort of rebound spring, or something inside. It's just a couple of pieces of barstock, rubber washers and a bolt! If I knew they were that simple, I would've made my own! How can these possibly have a rebound effect? Someone please explain!

    [​IMG]
     
  2. AVater
    Joined: Dec 9, 2008
    Posts: 3,154

    AVater
    ALLIANCE MEMBER
    1. Connecticut HAMB'ers

    All they do is rely on friction.
     
  3. JOECOOL
    Joined: Jan 13, 2004
    Posts: 2,771

    JOECOOL
    Member

    some ,a little more sophisticated ,have a spring to keep a reasonable amount of pressure. I would probably take a longer bolt and some old valve springs and retainers and soup em up a little.
     
  4. evintho
    Joined: May 28, 2007
    Posts: 2,378

    evintho
    Member

    Any pics?
     

  5. Don's Hot Rods
    Joined: Oct 7, 2005
    Posts: 8,319

    Don's Hot Rods
    Member
    from florida

    Friction and resistance. They are ok, but good hydraulic tube shocks are so much better and require no constant tightening.

    Don
     
  6. evintho
    Joined: May 28, 2007
    Posts: 2,378

    evintho
    Member

    So, I just tighten down that bolt really good? The only place I can mount 'em is on the side of the frame rails and run a bolt thru the 'bones.
     
  7. 55willys
    Joined: Dec 7, 2012
    Posts: 1,711

    55willys
    Member

    Those pretty much don't work. There is not enough friction area to do much and when you finally get enough pressure to do anything you might as well bolt the suspension tight so it won't move. A proper friction shock will have multiple and larger friction areas with a spring to adjust the friction (tune the shock). More like these.[​IMG][​IMG]
     
    marioD likes this.
  8. volvobrynk
    Joined: Jan 30, 2011
    Posts: 3,587

    volvobrynk
    Member
    from Denmark

    Are you sure they didn't send you a hinge? Lol

    They rubber as friction pads I wouldn't trust. My personal experience with rubber is, eighter they do to much or to little. Not easy to tune.
    You will need a better friction material, and that one little bolt looks to small.
    And by the time you fixed that, you will hav spend the same amount of times as starting over.
    Just my two cents.
     
    marioD and 26 T Ford RPU like this.
  9. aaggie
    Joined: Nov 21, 2009
    Posts: 2,530

    aaggie
    Member

    Really old friction shocks used leather pads instead of rubber. Friction shocks were designed for fairly slow speeds and when driven past the limit the heat buildup negates the dampening, that's how hydraulic shocks were invented.
     
  10. A Boner
    Joined: Dec 25, 2004
    Posts: 7,444

    A Boner
    Member

    Friction shocks look real good, tube shocks work real good!
     
  11. seb fontana
    Joined: Sep 1, 2005
    Posts: 8,493

    seb fontana
    Member
    from ct

    Throw them as far as you can, they aren't even built right so both washers will work...ford houdailles would be way better...
     
    V8-m likes this.
  12. Don and Aboner are correct. I have friction shocks on my cabrio and I am tweaking them routinely.
     
  13. Friction shocks work ok at best when on a light car like a light t bucket. However, those look like poorly designed garbage, with not enough friction area,,,, but I bet they were cheap,lol.
     
    V8-m likes this.
  14. stimpy
    Joined: Apr 16, 2006
    Posts: 3,546

    stimpy

    so thats what that material was , on the farm they turned hard like bakelite from the years . we just put them back together and ran them , but they were on the hay and corn wagons not on any power vehicles they do stop excessive bouncing from the springs when loaded , but are real stiff often it was like running with a solid suspension when empty
     
  15. evintho
    Joined: May 28, 2007
    Posts: 2,378

    evintho
    Member

    Yeah, I agree. Pretty much junk! There really isn't any room to run tube shocks. Maybe I'll keep my eye out for some MG rear shocks.
    The motor weighs maybe 300 lbs and the whole car 1200 lbs, soaking wet. '38 spring w/5 leaves.
    Do I really need to run front shocks?

    [​IMG]
     
  16. JEM
    Joined: Feb 6, 2007
    Posts: 1,040

    JEM
    Member

    Those look like some kind of static-display fake shock, not something actually intended for road use.

    The real thing:

    http://www.andrehartfordltd.co.uk/main.htm

    Note multiple friction elements, the tensioning spiders for the friction stack, etc. They claim all kinds of improvements but this is still the basic design from the '20s.

    Still not as effective as something (or at least most things) hydraulic, but period.
     
  17. If it wasn't for that air cleaner thing you would have room for tube shocks, or just use some ''quality'' friction shocks. JW
     
  18. Andamo
    Joined: Jan 10, 2006
    Posts: 526

    Andamo
    Member

    Looks like they were welded up in 7th grade shop class. Poor excuse for a shock absorber.
     
    V8-m likes this.
  19. evintho
    Joined: May 28, 2007
    Posts: 2,378

    evintho
    Member

  20. JOECOOL
    Joined: Jan 13, 2004
    Posts: 2,771

    JOECOOL
    Member

    I don't have any pictures,I just made about the same thing only used a longer bolt with a old stock chevy valve spring and retainer. Put the bolt thru it and tighten it down to where you want it.
    No I wouldn't go to the trouble to do it again, Camaro shocks on sale ( Rock Auto has them for $8.50 each) are only slightly more than the materials to build these, and they work.
     
  21. Says $80 on his website on that link.. Still, a turd at $40 is still a turd.

    I dont have any links (as I make my own), but what you want to look for is more than a poorly cut washer to spread the load. If you think about the design of the ones you bought, as you tighten down the bolt the washer isnt going to put the same pressure out on the ends of the washer as it will where the bolt is. Thats why you see those "spring" type pieces. If you look closely at them, they arent flat, but rather inverted to add pressure outward and spread the load.
     
  22. jazz1
    Joined: Apr 30, 2011
    Posts: 1,534

    jazz1
    Member

    Looks like they are more for show use,,,should be chromed at that price. Anyone ever used a knee action shock up there?
     
  23. Hollywood Hot Rods, I think..............very nice. HollywoodHotrodsOpenHouse08180.jpg
     
    volvobrynk and bct like this.
  24. butch27
    Joined: Dec 10, 2004
    Posts: 2,847

    butch27
    Member

    One of the FIRST things old time rodders did was to mount "airplane" shocks as they were called back the, and threw away those frictions.
     
  25. evintho
    Joined: May 28, 2007
    Posts: 2,378

    evintho
    Member

    Couldn't find 'em on Hollywood Hot Rods site. Any more info? Those are some nice lookin' shocks!
     
  26. Really not meaning to rain on your weight parade, but that car is a lot nearer 2,000 pounds than you think...a fookin' Gold Wing is 1,000 pounds...my last 'T' was 1,900 lbs, and had less bodywork than yours...
    Cosmo
     
  27. Friction shocks used on 20's dirt trackers used hard wood discs soaked in linseed oil. With the finger spring, they were very adjustable.
     
    bct likes this.
  28. Bearing Burner
    Joined: Mar 2, 2009
    Posts: 1,112

    Bearing Burner
    Member
    from W. MA

    I used friction material from Mc Master Carr and Bellville washers for tension. Purchased a couple of different washers so I could play with tension.
     
  29. This is where you find the parts.
     

Share This Page

Register now to get rid of these ads!

Archive

Copyright © 1995-2021 The Jalopy Journal: Steal our stuff, we'll kick your teeth in. Terms of Service. Privacy Policy.

Atomic Industry
Forum software by XenForo™ ©2010-2014 XenForo Ltd.