However, in picture #3, when I put my dividing calipers on the rims, I see the fronts as being larger in diameter. I would say one inch larger on the front. But if Tardel says they're the same, who am I to argue.
Nice write up, Ryan. Like a good photographer dealing with shadows, reflections, or unwanted background objects, you make it look easy and intentional. Us too! The first time I shot at this location, it was still open and we went inside to ask permission. As expected, there was a dyed-in-the wool machinist working away by himself. He was a nice guy...liked the idea of us using his building as a back drop and stepped out for a quick glance at the hot rod we brought before getting back to work. The shop was fairly dark, but light peeked in some of the dusty windows illuminating the old equipment and a '58 Apache fleetside that was parked in the corner. Next time I'm gonna ask if we can shoot inside.
Maybe it's the 32 hubcap on the rear, and the 33 cap on the front thats throwing you. To my that just ads to the charm of the car, like some young guy would have done back in the day.
I love the style.....especially the engine bay. Can anyone photo shop a black frame and wheels? Might be a nice contrast between the brown IMO.
I like vintage feeling colors instead of more modern if that make sense, solids that are earth toned. Also the bike tires look great on there, I plan to run them on a future project as well, I have seen many pics of old traditional open wheeled rides running them.
Nice looking car, nothing wrong with the shade of color on my monitor. Though, I think the car might benefit from a little less of it, a few details in black might be nice. However... Who am I to judge Mr. Tardel? I've read his book, it's not the other way around. Thank you Sir for that BTW. I second wanting to see photos of the other 10. I think 2 more were added, that leaves 7 cars remaining. Maybe another thread of all 10 with multiple views of each car is in order? There is a lot to like about this car. I think the stance is great, it seems low even though he's running 17's all around and a stock front axle. I am wondering if someone could provide a few more build details. How did he get this car low... reversed eyes on the front and rear springs, how many leaves, what cross members were used, etc... ? I'm building a pre-war roadster with a stock front axle and would like it to be a bit on the low side. This information might help me achieve that objective, so thanks in advance for providing it. In keeping with the thread's theme... SCTA or SCAT? -Carl
The Jalopy Journal
