Register now to get rid of these ads!

Technical Bearing clearance for a ford flatty v8

Discussion in 'Traditional Hot Rods' started by falcal762, Nov 23, 2014.

  1. falcal762
    Joined: Aug 2, 2010
    Posts: 9

    falcal762
    Member
    from FT.Worth

    Hey Guys, I'm kinda new this so please bear with me. I'm in the middle of building a 81T 221in flathead V8. I need to know the correct way to check rod bearing clearance for the floating bearings in this eng. I used plastigauge on the outer bearing surface and got a reading of .001. the book says I should have .0015 to .0035. I've read online that I should MIC the outer dia. of the crank journal, the inner dia. of the rod torqued to specs. get the difference. MIC the rod bearing and subtract that from the difference to get the clearance. I don't have any good micrometers, just the one I bought from harbor freight. Any advise would be appreciated. Thanks!
     
  2. joel
    Joined: Oct 10, 2009
    Posts: 2,482

    joel
    ALLIANCE MEMBER

    There is a great explanation in Ron Hollerans book "Nostalgia". If you don't have it, see if you can borrow one. I can't remember who, but someone on the Fordbarn was selling them. Great book.
     
  3. flatjack
    Joined: Feb 13, 2007
    Posts: 975

    flatjack
    Member

    Need a good micrometer to do this.
     
  4. joel
    Joined: Oct 10, 2009
    Posts: 2,482

    joel
    ALLIANCE MEMBER

    • Try a PM to 4tford on the Fordbarn, he was selling Ol Rons book.
     

  5. The 39 guy
    Joined: Nov 5, 2010
    Posts: 3,536

    The 39 guy
    Member

  6. I know someone will disagree with me, but the bearings (full floaters) seem to fit the contours of the rod best if they measure 2.22 across the bearing shell at its widest point.The controversy seems to come when changing this measurement on the bearing if it DOES NOT measure 2.22. To widen the measurement,lay the bearing on a flat surface and "gently" strike it on its backside to widen; to narrow the measurement,,lay the bearing on end squarely with the surface,and "gently" strike the bearing causing the measurement to narrow. The actual desired measurement is 2.215 to 2.225 with 2.22 being in the middle.
     
  7. falcal762
    Joined: Aug 2, 2010
    Posts: 9

    falcal762
    Member
    from FT.Worth

    OK I think I understand what you saying. Is The measurement taken from the inner bearing surface Or outer? And if my rod journals are .030 under, my measurement should read 2.252. correct?
     
  8. falcal762
    Joined: Aug 2, 2010
    Posts: 9

    falcal762
    Member
    from FT.Worth

    OK I think I understand what you saying. Is The measurement taken from the inner bearing surface Or outer? And if my rod journals are .030 under, my measurement should read 2.252. correct?
     
  9. flatjack
    Joined: Feb 13, 2007
    Posts: 975

    flatjack
    Member

    The measurement is taken from the outer surface, so as long as your rod ID is standard the outside measurement should be the same even for undersize bearings. I just got done building one of these engines and I used 2.218 for the measurement. Mount the rod to the crank with the bearings in place without the piston, torque to spec and make sure the rod rotates freely.
     
  10. falcal762
    Joined: Aug 2, 2010
    Posts: 9

    falcal762
    Member
    from FT.Worth

    Ok thanks Flatjack.
     

Share This Page

Register now to get rid of these ads!

Archive

Copyright © 1995-2021 The Jalopy Journal: Steal our stuff, we'll kick your teeth in. Terms of Service. Privacy Policy.

Atomic Industry
Forum software by XenForo™ ©2010-2014 XenForo Ltd.