Register now to get rid of these ads!

Technical Identify this trans

Discussion in 'The Hokey Ass Message Board' started by deto, Oct 19, 2014.

  1. deto
    Joined: Jun 26, 2010
    Posts: 2,620

    deto
    Member

    Hey guys. I'm new to 4 speeds and I wanted to know if this is a T10 or a Muncie. Sorry for the crappy pic but its the best I can do. The guy selling it is cleaning out his grandpas garage and didn't offer any more info than he thinks its out of a first gen camaro.
     

    Attached Files:

  2. squirrel
    Joined: Sep 23, 2004
    Posts: 56,077

    squirrel
    Member

    saginaw. Because the reverse lever is on the side cover, not the tail h ousing
     
  3. deto
    Joined: Jun 26, 2010
    Posts: 2,620

    deto
    Member

    Is this model robust enough to handle a hot SBC in a 3200 lb car? Would it have been available prior to 1964?
     
  4. 333 Half Evil
    Joined: Oct 16, 2006
    Posts: 1,440

    333 Half Evil
    Member

    I believe squirrel is right. Depending on what the hot SBC really is and how you plan on driving, it will handle it's fair share. I've run saginaws in stock cars with 500+ hp as well a several off topic drag cars running high 11's low 12's and did not have many problems at all. Yes, I've broke some, but I've also broke muncies and borg-warners too. The only stock gm 4 speed I've not broken yet was the super t-10's, they are quite durable!!!
     

  5. Seriously now, that all depends on what you plan on doing with the car and how you drive it.
    I think the Saginaw 4 speed came out in the mid 60's
    Google is your friend, my friend
     
    Last edited: Oct 20, 2014
  6. deto
    Joined: Jun 26, 2010
    Posts: 2,620

    deto
    Member

    327, 10:1, solid roller can, 510 lift. I think I have an intake picked, low rise dual quad. I think 380hp is conservative. I would like to be able to drive it fairly hard. I guess I will know if/when I blow it up...
     
  7. squirrel
    Joined: Sep 23, 2004
    Posts: 56,077

    squirrel
    Member

    It's probably going to last at least as long as the "correct" BW T-10, and will probably cost a bunch less. Don't tell anyone it's a Saginaw...odds are, like you, they won't know just by looking at it.

    as far as durability..if you lift your foot off the gas for the 1-2 shift, it will last a long time, if it's in good condition to start with.
     
  8. onetrickpony
    Joined: Sep 21, 2010
    Posts: 761

    onetrickpony
    Member
    from Texas

    I ran a Saginaw for a couple of years behind a warmed over 283 in a '66 C10. On narrow street tires, it did fine. I sold it to a guy who put a set of sticky tires on it and blew the trans on the first burnout.

    Your mileage may vary.
     
  9. deto
    Joined: Jun 26, 2010
    Posts: 2,620

    deto
    Member

    Thanks squirrel
     
  10. As Squirrel suggested, speed shifting will contribute to a quick end. Saginaw were used behind mild small blocks, so it has some strength capacity. The exact internal trans gear ratio is the indicator of the torque capacity, generally higher number first gear ratio is weaker. Look for the number of grooves on input shaft and then compare that to search for the values.
     
  11. Shaggy
    Joined: Mar 6, 2003
    Posts: 5,207

    Shaggy
    Member
    from Sultan, WA

    That's what many came in, I'll add looking that it's a close ratio because of the lines on the imput shaft
     
  12. There's a good reason why they put them in Vegas!

    Transmissions (and rear ends) don't necessarily break in the middle of a gear sequence, but almost always on a power shift or starting line launch.
    There's a lot that you can get away as far as light duty stuff, if drive the car prudently.
     
  13. deto
    Joined: Jun 26, 2010
    Posts: 2,620

    deto
    Member

    I'm picking up a freshly rebuilt Muncie M20 tomorrow... No need to bother with a Saginaw naw
     

Share This Page

Register now to get rid of these ads!

Archive

Copyright © 1995-2021 The Jalopy Journal: Steal our stuff, we'll kick your teeth in. Terms of Service. Privacy Policy.

Atomic Industry
Forum software by XenForo™ ©2010-2014 XenForo Ltd.