Register now to get rid of these ads!

Technical Packard Trans to Ford torque tube

Discussion in 'The Hokey Ass Message Board' started by gray, Sep 16, 2014.

  1. gray
    Joined: Jan 7, 2007
    Posts: 88

    gray
    Member

    Anyone out there ever been involved in adapting an early Packard trans to a Ford torque tube? I'm planning to build a mid 40's style '27 T roadster with a flathead and a Packard trans. I would really like to keep the torque tube if I can. The Packard tranny is a 1937 top shift. I was hoping I could also keep the original K-member in the '32 frame I'll be using and tie the whole Packard torque tube adaptation together at the K-member. I know it will require some mods and machining but any info. on the topic would be appreciated. Anybody know of a capable machine shop that could help?
    Craig
     
  2. 55willys
    Joined: Dec 7, 2012
    Posts: 1,711

    55willys
    Member

    Have not done that but I would tackle the problem with a tape measure and a drawing with measurements. Jim
     
  3. Stovebolt
    Joined: May 2, 2001
    Posts: 3,535

    Stovebolt
    Member

    hrm195507p1.jpg hrm195507p2.jpg hrm195507p3.jpg hrm195507p4.jpg

    Althought this article is for Packards into a Chev torque tube, the outer torque-tube from a Ford and a Chev are interchangeable.

    What you'll need to do is determine if the output shaft of the Packard can be machined to take a ford universal - I do not have my stuff here in order to measure
     
    falcongeorge likes this.
  4. gray
    Joined: Jan 7, 2007
    Posts: 88

    gray
    Member

    Great info. Stovebolt. If I decide to tackle this I will keep ya'll posted.
     
    Stovebolt likes this.

  5. alchemy
    Joined: Sep 27, 2002
    Posts: 20,522

    alchemy
    Member

    I love the caption with the "$10 resplining job". Find a shop that will even look at that for under a hundred now.
     
    falcongeorge likes this.
  6. seb fontana
    Joined: Sep 1, 2005
    Posts: 8,493

    seb fontana
    Member
    from ct

    Its more of a wonder that the splines held up with what they had for weld back then...I get a charge out of some of the machining charges from a place like Cook's way back when..
     
  7. 'Mo
    Joined: Sep 26, 2007
    Posts: 7,432

    'Mo
    Member

    Bookmarked.
     
  8. Hnstray
    Joined: Aug 23, 2009
    Posts: 12,355

    Hnstray
    ALLIANCE MEMBER
    from Quincy, IL

    Great article! I love to see (and recall) how things were done when there wasn't the huge variety of bolt in parts available that we have come to take for granted in the last few decades Thanks for posting

    All that "cheap" machine work back then was just about the same as today when compared to wages of the period. Lots of people in 1955 working for $2.00 an hour.......

    "everything is relative". :)

    Ray
     
    Last edited: Sep 17, 2014
  9. newjersm3
    Joined: Oct 26, 2005
    Posts: 120

    newjersm3
    Member

    Just measured a friends packard to torque tube trans with the adapter and it is approx. 2 inch longer then a 39 trans.
     

Share This Page

Register now to get rid of these ads!

Archive

Copyright © 1995-2021 The Jalopy Journal: Steal our stuff, we'll kick your teeth in. Terms of Service. Privacy Policy.

Atomic Industry
Forum software by XenForo™ ©2010-2014 XenForo Ltd.