Register now to get rid of these ads!

Galaxie Brakes

Discussion in 'The Hokey Ass Message Board' started by borntoolate, Sep 27, 2006.

  1. borntoolate
    Joined: Feb 18, 2006
    Posts: 320

    borntoolate
    Member

    I read all the articles on using mid-seventies T-bird, Cougar, etc. disc brakes on 60s Galaxies, so I gave it a shot. For my 61, I used spindles and brakes from a 79 t-bird. Yeah, everything bolts up fine, but It's got positive camber on both sides with no shims in the control arms. No adjustment left. Am I having brain flatulism or what? I don't think the car has been wrecked or messed with in any other way. Did the factory specs on these cars vary? Anybody else been down this road? :confused:
     
  2. treb11
    Joined: Jan 21, 2006
    Posts: 3,958

    treb11
    ALLIANCE MEMBER

  3. tommy
    Joined: Mar 3, 2001
    Posts: 14,757

    tommy
    Member Emeritus

    One thing you might want to look into is a Moog "problem solver" upper control arm shaft and bushing kit. I can't quote what years, makes and models they made them for but Moog did make an off set upper CA shaft that permitted more adjustment for some of the cars back then. We always ordered them in liew of the std shaft kits. I was able to get Moog parts for my 57 a while back so it's very possible that there are some sitting in a warehouse someplace that supplies the local parts houses in your area. You never know until you ask. They are listed along with the std. CA shaft kits in the old catalogs.
     
  4. borntoolate
    Joined: Feb 18, 2006
    Posts: 320

    borntoolate
    Member

    Thanks for the tips, guys. I'll be doing some investigating.
     

  5. Nominal
    Joined: Jun 9, 2005
    Posts: 171

    Nominal
    Member

  6. Rocket Scientist Chris
    Joined: Mar 3, 2001
    Posts: 602

    Rocket Scientist Chris
    ALLIANCE MEMBER

    One of the posts talked about a .100 inch difference in the location of the upper balljoint bore in the spindle. Some spindles being .100 inch toward the outside and some being .100 inch to the inside. The later causing the positive camber with no available adjustment. If you ended up with a positive camber after the swap, why couldn't you just mill/grind the .100 inch (or a little more for added adjustment with shims) off the mounting face of the upper control arm shaft? Or would doing this compromise the strenth of the control arm shaft? :confused:
     
  7. borntoolate
    Joined: Feb 18, 2006
    Posts: 320

    borntoolate
    Member

    I did think of that, and with the same concern in mind. I also thought about having someone actually section the control arms about a an 1/8"-1/4" with a real good welder-guy in command and plenty of gussets............... Even though I appreciate cool cars of all makes, my unfortune alternative is to get brackets made for GM calipers that fit the original spindles. I just wouldn't tell my dad I've got a UFO (unidentified Ford object) on my car. Ha! Thanks for the reply.
     
  8. lgh1157
    Joined: Sep 15, 2004
    Posts: 1,671

    lgh1157
    Member

    I had the same issue, was the only thing keeping me off the road after a front end rebuild so. . . . I went back to drums ha
     

Share This Page

Register now to get rid of these ads!

Archive

Copyright © 1995-2021 The Jalopy Journal: Steal our stuff, we'll kick your teeth in. Terms of Service. Privacy Policy.

Atomic Industry
Forum software by XenForo™ ©2010-2014 XenForo Ltd.