Register now to get rid of these ads!

Technical Rear gear question

Discussion in 'The Hokey Ass Message Board' started by hipermax, Jul 2, 2014.

  1. gimpyshotrods
    Joined: May 20, 2009
    Posts: 23,333

    gimpyshotrods
    ALLIANCE MEMBER

    What rodder doesn't want a giant smoky burn out?

    Posted using the Full Custom H.A.M.B. App!
     
  2. hipermax
    Joined: Nov 1, 2013
    Posts: 41

    hipermax
    Member
    from NC

    That's what I'm lookin for, something that bad ass on the street, light um up, but also want to be able to take it on road trips


    Posted using the Full Custom H.A.M.B. App!
     
  3. telekenfun
    Joined: Mar 9, 2010
    Posts: 250

    telekenfun
    Member

    Fab32 @post #16 has the right approach. Stimpy @ post #23 makes an important point at the end of his comments that I would like to expand upon also.
    If you plan on a street machine, street tractability is far more important than high RPM power. The cam needs to provide smooth torque band from a minimum 2000RPM. That is a "RV" or "torquer" cam with about 245 degree duration advertised. That cam will still pull fine above 4000RPM which is tighter than you really what to spin it for very long. It may not make for impressive bench-race conversation but will provide a great all-round driver.
    Back to the gear set, Fab32 mentioned the standard modern setup, 2000RPM @70MPH. If you spend any time on the highways, freeways, etc. you want you engine to be revving around the lower end of it's torque curve where it can live forever. There, you still have plenty of headroom in the torque band for passing or to keep from getting run over by a Toyota doing 85MPH. The need to do burnouts will become secondary when you compare time on the road stopping and starting and turning corners versus time spent doing tire frying burnouts. For burnouts any final drive gear will get you there with enough power, but you may need to adjust the brake bias to the front to get them broken loose if you don't have enough.
    For reference we have a 49 Buick with a modified straight eight/700R4/3.08 posi /27" tire. Goes 75MPH @2100RPM. It has plenty of grunt with a 4&5/16" stroke but feels a little long legged, I'm switching to 3.42's. It doesn't do burnouts just a little squeal on takeoff, but it's no pig, it just pulls longer in each lower gear and breaks a hundred just going around a Semi.
    My 36 Ford with a Nailhead and a Gear Vender OD, 3.73's and 28" tires seems a little short geared even in overdrive. But that coupe will come around on me if I'm not careful just by stabbing the throttle. It could stand a taller gear.
    Also have a 54 GMC with a very strong six w/ 4sp hydro & .72 OD/ 3.55 final & 29" tire. It gets 1st & 2nd gear rubber and can still knock down 41 second miles, mile after mile @2800RPM. That's 88 MPH, & I wouldn't change a thing on that rig.
    So from the empirical evidence I've gleaned from my own experience, I say GM has it just about right with their 3.42 final ratio. Set your priorities, you know what you have for a rig and make your choice, You'll be the driver.
    Best Regards and Good Luck with all your endeavors, KB.
     
  4. A wise man would learn to do the gear calc without a gear calculator.
    RPM divided by gear ratio gives wheel RPM.
    diameter of tireX3.14/12 gives feet per revolution.
    feet per revolution time number of revs of wheel give number of feet per minute
    feet per minute x 60 gives feet traveled per hour
    that divided 5280 gives MPH.
     
  5. gimpyshotrods
    Joined: May 20, 2009
    Posts: 23,333

    gimpyshotrods
    ALLIANCE MEMBER

    RPM
    Gear 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 3500 4000 4500 5000
    3.06 6.17 9.25 12.33 15.41 18.50 21.58 24.66 27.74 30.83
    1.63 11.57 17.36 23.15 28.94 34.72 40.51 46.30 52.08 57.87
    1.00 18.87 28.30 37.73 47.16 56.60 66.03 75.46 84.90 94.33
    0.70 26.95 40.43 53.90 67.38 80.85 94.33 107.80 121.28 134.76 MPH

    RPM
    Gear 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 3500 4000 4500 5000
    3.06 6.78 10.17 13.55 16.94 20.33 23.72 27.11 30.50 33.88
    1.63 12.72 19.08 25.44 31.81 38.17 44.53 50.89 57.25 63.61
    1.00 20.74 31.11 41.47 51.84 62.21 72.58 82.95 93.32 103.69
    0.70 29.62 44.44 59.25 74.06 88.87 103.69 118.50 133.31 148.12 MPH

    RPM
    Gear
    1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 3500 4000 4500 5000
    3.06 7.12 10.68 14.24 17.80 21.36 24.92 28.48 32.04 35.60
    1.63 13.37 20.05 26.73 33.42 40.10 46.79 53.47 60.15 66.84
    1.00 21.79 32.68 43.58 54.47 65.37 76.26 87.15 98.05 108.94
    0.70 31.13 46.69 62.25 77.82 93.38 108.94 124.51 140.07 155.63 MPH

    RPM
    Gear 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 3500 4000 4500 5000
    3.06 7.39 11.09 14.78 18.48 22.17 25.87 29.56 33.26 36.96
    1.63 13.88 20.81 27.75 34.69 41.63 48.56 55.50 62.44 69.38
    1.00 22.62 33.93 45.23 56.54 67.85 79.16 90.47 101.78 113.08
    0.70 32.31 48.46 64.62 80.77 96.93 113.08 129.24 145.39 161.55 MPH
     
    loudbang likes this.
  6. gimpyshotrods
    Joined: May 20, 2009
    Posts: 23,333

    gimpyshotrods
    ALLIANCE MEMBER

    Sorry about the formatting. I can't seem to get it right, but there it is, from fun-to-economy. 4.10, 3.73, 3.55, 3.42.
     
    Last edited: Jul 3, 2014
  7. I have a 700R4 with a 3:42 rear gear and 29 inch tall rubber. I run the torque converter lockup on a separate switch so it has to be engaged manually- it makes the transmission like a 5 speed. I find I only use the lockup on the open road above 60 mph- never on two lane roads. With the converter locked up it turns 1950 rpm at 70 mph. It has enough bottom end for me


    Posted using the Full Custom H.A.M.B. App!
     
  8. Hnstray
    Joined: Aug 23, 2009
    Posts: 12,355

    Hnstray
    ALLIANCE MEMBER
    from Quincy, IL

    Do I understand your post correctly to mean the switch actually activates the lock up function in the converter any time the switch is "on"? That would require manually flipping the switch to unlock when coming to a stop.

    If so, have you considered wiring the lock up in such a manner that the manual switch merely 'opens' or 'closes' the normal lock up circuit , allowing the 'automatic' lock up/unlock to function whenever the switch is 'closed'? And, in turn, when you do not want lock up, it doesn't occur because the circuit is open. The benefit being, even with lock up selected, that would eliminate the need to manually unlock the converter when coming to a stop.

    If I have misinterpreted your post, please excuse this reply.
     
  9. I have to manually lock and unlock the converter by throwing the switch-yes you have to remember to unlock the converter when you are getting off the freeway - if you don't unlock it-well you know it . I set mine up this way because I didn't like the way the factory setup locks up at about 40 mph if you are not 'on it ' a bit


    Posted using the Full Custom H.A.M.B. App!
     
  10. wisdonm
    Joined: Jun 20, 2011
    Posts: 444

    wisdonm
    Member

    I worked the numbers out differently. I have a Ford product and a 3550 5-speed with a .63 OD. I have 3.5, 3.8, and 4.10 pumpkins. At the stop light grand prix, I will only run up to 60 mph and I only want to make one shift. So by working the numbers, the 4.10 would require two shifts to hit 60mph at red line, and the 3.5 is too fast (mph) and therefore has a slower elapsed time to 60 mph. So the 3.8 is the sweet spot for me.

    Can't believe it took Detroit so long to add 5th gears. My car ('69) came with a 4-speed and a 3.0. You could either cruise on the highway OR , with a gear change, win at the lights, but not both. The change to a 5-speed was night and day. I run strong at the lights and have driven to California and back averaging 25+ mpg.
     
  11. gimpyshotrods
    Joined: May 20, 2009
    Posts: 23,333

    gimpyshotrods
    ALLIANCE MEMBER


    That should be wired through the 4th gear switch, so lockup only works in 4th, even if you forget to turn it off.

    Your setup is dangerous, and should be changed, before someone gets hurt.

    Posted using the Full Custom H.A.M.B. App!
     
  12. It only locks in 4th gear-But I ask-how would I get hurt if I left it locked up?-
    The only time I forgot-The car still slows down to a stop-it just seems to chug a little as it slows down to remind you to unlock it.
     
  13. gimpyshotrods
    Joined: May 20, 2009
    Posts: 23,333

    gimpyshotrods
    ALLIANCE MEMBER

    Ever rear-end someone who stopped short?

    Posted using the Full Custom H.A.M.B. App!
     
  14. 1971BB427
    Joined: Mar 6, 2010
    Posts: 8,767

    1971BB427
    Member
    from Oregon

    I guess I'm going to go against the majority of those who responded and say I wouldn't run a 3.73 or lower with a 700r4 and a 26" tire. The long smokey burnouts you want will be tough to do with the low rear gear, and low first gear of a 700r4. Your engine will run out of rpm's on a long burnout, and you'll need to shift to 2nd pretty quickly. And the combination wont give you the cruise rpm advantage of the OD 4th gear I'd like either.
    I think a 3.42 or 3.55 would be a perfect combination of good launch and good highway cruising too.
     
  15. No I havent rear ended anyone-And will all due respect,I am not seeing your point-I do appreciate your concern
    The car doesnt have the ablity to roll on out of control if that is what you mean.
    Locking trhe converter doesnt put the car on Auto-Pilot
     
  16. hoop98
    Joined: Jan 23, 2013
    Posts: 1,362

    hoop98
    Member
    from Texas

    Looking at your avatar I guessed on a combo 3800 pounds, 290 HP
    Here are 3, 0 to 1/2 mile, graphs with 3.08, 5.38 and 4.56 gears.

    [​IMG]

    [​IMG]

    [​IMG]
     
    Last edited: Jul 3, 2014
  17. jseery
    Joined: Sep 4, 2013
    Posts: 743

    jseery
    Member
    from Wichita KS

    I'd vote for something around a 4:11 gear. Changed the gears in my 05 Mustang GT to 3:73. Everyone was telling me go with 4:10 gearing but I was afraid highway performance. Now that the gears are in there wish I had went with the 4:10!
     
  18. hoop98
    Joined: Jan 23, 2013
    Posts: 1,362

    hoop98
    Member
    from Texas

    Comparison of high gear RPM.

    [​IMG]
    [​IMG]
     
  19. gimpyshotrods
    Joined: May 20, 2009
    Posts: 23,333

    gimpyshotrods
    ALLIANCE MEMBER

    Your initial statement was not clear on when it locks up. You clarified after.

    Also, if it is chugging, when you are slowing down, it might still be locked, even when it is not in 4ht.

    Did you use the 4th gear contact switch to provide the ground for the converter lockup solenoid, or does the ground wire go elsewhere?

    If it only can lock in 4th, regardless of switch position, that is the factory setup, on most 700R4's (there were some variants that could lock in 3rd. as well).

    Having a converter that stays locked, all of the time, regardless of gear, brakes, or throttle position, is an accident, and lawsuit waiting to happen.
     
  20. gimpyshotrods
    Joined: May 20, 2009
    Posts: 23,333

    gimpyshotrods
    ALLIANCE MEMBER

    How did you get the table in there? Mine just came out junk.
     
  21. hoop98
    Joined: Jan 23, 2013
    Posts: 1,362

    hoop98
    Member
    from Texas

    Used snipper to make a pic of the chart then posted the pic.
     
  22. hipermax
    Joined: Nov 1, 2013
    Posts: 41

    hipermax
    Member
    from NC

    With all the info, spread sheets, calculators, and personal experience you guys have sent my way I'm going to go with the 4.10-1, it will be a blast on the street and with the 700r4 tans. It will get down the highway nicely. Thanks a lot for the info!


    Posted using the Full Custom H.A.M.B. App!
     
  23. gimpyshotrods
    Joined: May 20, 2009
    Posts: 23,333

    gimpyshotrods
    ALLIANCE MEMBER

    Yeah, sometimes I have the dumb. I use that tool all day, at work.
     
  24. (Quote)
    Did you use the 4th gear contact switch to provide the ground for the converter lockup solenoid, or does the ground wire go elsewhere?
    .[/QUOTE]
    Thats a good question-I have had this transmission in the car and operating for about 9 years and roughly 35,000 miles-I don't recall exactly how I did hook it up to be honest but I do know I was under the direction of the transmission shop that built the transmission for me
    He told me what to do and it has seemed to work good all this time
     
  25. gimpyshotrods
    Joined: May 20, 2009
    Posts: 23,333

    gimpyshotrods
    ALLIANCE MEMBER

    Try to come to a complete stop, somewhere safe, without turning off the switch.

    That will tell the tale.
     
  26. stimpy
    Joined: Apr 16, 2006
    Posts: 3,546

    stimpy

    the proper way is thru the trans and the brake switch and you can always use the brakeswitch as the failsafe disconnect
     
  27. stimpy
    Joined: Apr 16, 2006
    Posts: 3,546

    stimpy

    but look at the trans ratios on the vette 6-8 speed and you see why , they do the reverse instead of OD it they start out with a very underdriven trans ( kind of what we do for semis massive ratios to get out of the hole and OD for the top 2 holes and use 18 gear ratios to do it , bob tailing I do not use the bottom 9 gears as I do not need the multiplication of torque and can start out in 12th gear but will smoke the tires doing so ) with a vette I wouldn't be suprised it you could start off in 3rd gear without choking , more companies are going to more gear ratios for smoothness and to get rid of the Od whine and clutch problems ( harmonics causes engagement problems in clutches ) .
     
  28. 1934coupe
    Joined: Feb 22, 2007
    Posts: 5,070

    1934coupe
    Member

    I would put 4.88s in it and smoke those 20" till they blow! You can't put a price on FUN:rolleyes:
    Why do people ask these questions?

    Pat
     
  29. stimpy
    Joined: Apr 16, 2006
    Posts: 3,546

    stimpy


    my price in fun cost me a diff ( crappy stock gm unit ) and a $500 fine for disturbing the peace ( only thing they could get me on since it was private property .)
     
  30. gimpyshotrods
    Joined: May 20, 2009
    Posts: 23,333

    gimpyshotrods
    ALLIANCE MEMBER

    Sure, in addition to the 4th gear switch, but not instead of.
     

Share This Page

Register now to get rid of these ads!

Archive

Copyright © 1995-2021 The Jalopy Journal: Steal our stuff, we'll kick your teeth in. Terms of Service. Privacy Policy.

Atomic Industry
Forum software by XenForo™ ©2010-2014 XenForo Ltd.