Register now to get rid of these ads!

History Short and Sweet

Discussion in 'Traditional Hot Rods' started by Jive-Bomber, Dec 10, 2013.

  1. Jive-Bomber
    Joined: Aug 21, 2001
    Posts: 3,762

    Jive-Bomber
    MODERATOR

  2. BeatnikPirate
    Joined: May 21, 2006
    Posts: 1,416

    BeatnikPirate
    Member
    from Media, Pa.

    Beauty is in the eye of the beholder (or is it beer holder), but having said that, I think the car's kinda "cute" & charming but it reminds me of a clown car. I think the proportions would look way better if it was stretched out. (I'm not criticizing, just throwing in my $.02).
     
    Last edited: Dec 10, 2013
  3. Steel A Rod
    Joined: Jun 28, 2010
    Posts: 265

    Steel A Rod
    Member

    I love it!! I know a short wheelbase can be tough to handle.
    But what a fun ride for around town. And it will always stand out in the crowd.
     
  4. sinticket
    Joined: May 6, 2006
    Posts: 580

    sinticket
    Member

    I really like this little car. If I wasnt 6'3"....
     

  5. It's no better or worse than a T-bucket.
     
  6. flamingokid
    Joined: Jan 5, 2005
    Posts: 2,203

    flamingokid
    Member

    I rarely ever criticize a feature car on here,but I'll break ranks.That car is just too damn short(and this comes from a guy who is 5'6")It's missing it's backside.Just 'cuz the guy has talent doesn't make it a masterpiece.
     
  7. Clown car. Really nicely put together, but clown car nonetheless. Swap the frame and put a bed on it and it would be killer.
     
  8. JeffreyJames
    Joined: Jun 13, 2007
    Posts: 16,628

    JeffreyJames
    Member
    from SUGAR CITY

    Reminds me of the Frontenac Powered RPU on HRM. Goofy but kinda awesome....

    [​IMG]
     
  9. Tom davison
    Joined: Mar 15, 2008
    Posts: 6,042

    Tom davison
    Member
    from Phoenix AZ

    "Proportions. They can make or break the look of a custom car"……they broke this one.

    In 1954, this was cutting edge, I suppose, different. But classic proportions to withstand the ages? Nah!
     
  10. the-rodster
    Joined: Jul 2, 2003
    Posts: 6,945

    the-rodster
    Member

    It's a little "stubby" compared to mine......
     

    Attached Files:

  11. the-rodster
    Joined: Jul 2, 2003
    Posts: 6,945

    the-rodster
    Member

    Also, I aint buying that "conveniently" less than 1500 lbs story.

    Mine weighs 1900 lbs, and they're almost identical, other than the wheelbase.

    Rich
     
  12. 49ratfink
    Joined: Feb 8, 2004
    Posts: 18,850

    49ratfink
    Member
    from California

    after seeing the same stubby car being built here using a 1946 Ford truck cab that one does not look so bad.
     
  13. Skidder
    Joined: Aug 10, 2010
    Posts: 40

    Skidder
    Member

    Doesn't really look to much diffferent...
     
  14. Jive-Bomber
    Joined: Aug 21, 2001
    Posts: 3,762

    Jive-Bomber
    MODERATOR


    I think where yours works better is in the wheelbase, especially- You left the rear wheels further out back and that prevented the 'crowding' we see with the feature car.
     
  15. metal man
    Joined: Dec 4, 2005
    Posts: 2,955

    metal man
    Member

    I like them both, but if you combined the front axle placement of the feature car, and the rear axle placement of your car, it would be an improvement over both of them in my opinion.
     
  16. Mercchev
    Joined: Dec 22, 2004
    Posts: 605

    Mercchev
    Member

    Where's the rest of it?
     
  17. Ol Dawg
    Joined: Oct 6, 2010
    Posts: 161

    Ol Dawg
    Member

    Never liked saying a car is cute, But, oh well whatever, bring on the clowns !
     
  18. Beau
    Joined: Jul 2, 2009
    Posts: 1,884

    Beau
    Member

    Mine is right in between.

    I think if the car above was lowered a tad it wouldn't make it look as short. I like the general look and the larger tires out front are growing on me.
     

    Attached Files:

    Last edited: Dec 10, 2013
  19. Squablow
    Joined: Apr 26, 2005
    Posts: 17,444

    Squablow
    Member

    Tweedy Pie was as short as roadsters get and still look nice in my opinion. This one reminds me of a doodlebug farm tractor. Put a 3' box on it and push the rear axle back to match, then I'm on board.
     
  20. the-rodster
    Joined: Jul 2, 2003
    Posts: 6,945

    the-rodster
    Member


    Hellen Keller called.... and even she says you're blind.


    :(


    Rich
     
  21. Nads
    Joined: Mar 5, 2001
    Posts: 11,862

    Nads
    Member
    from Hypocrisy

  22. autobilly
    Joined: May 23, 2007
    Posts: 3,129

    autobilly
    Member

    I'd have kept the tray.
     
  23. Here was my "shorty" that a friend and I put together a few years back...

    [​IMG]
    [​IMG]
     
    Last edited: Dec 11, 2013
  24. 19Fordy
    Joined: May 17, 2003
    Posts: 8,056

    19Fordy
    Member

    Doodlebug comes to mind.
     
  25. 50Fraud
    Joined: May 6, 2001
    Posts: 10,101

    50Fraud
    Member

    I had assumed that Roth built Tweedy Pie out of the OP roadster.
     
  26. My thoughts exactly.
     
  27. I'm not feeling it. I think it's just over the line on the clown side.
     
  28. tfeverfred
    Joined: Nov 11, 2006
    Posts: 15,791

    tfeverfred
    Member Emeritus

    Needs to move the engine or front suspension forward.
     
  29. tfeverfred
    Joined: Nov 11, 2006
    Posts: 15,791

    tfeverfred
    Member Emeritus

Share This Page

Register now to get rid of these ads!

Archive

Copyright © 1995-2021 The Jalopy Journal: Steal our stuff, we'll kick your teeth in. Terms of Service. Privacy Policy.

Atomic Industry
Forum software by XenForo™ ©2010-2014 XenForo Ltd.