Register now to get rid of these ads!

Hot Rods 1932 Roadster Build

Discussion in 'The Hokey Ass Message Board' started by CTaulbert, Mar 7, 2011.

  1. moonlight graham
    Joined: Apr 17, 2007
    Posts: 163

    moonlight graham
    Member
    from wyo

    Cory,

    Style #2 looks better and seem to work better with the angle of the rear bow or back panel creates. With #1 the curved window opening and rear panel angle seem to clash.

    Geoffrey
     
  2. TexasSpeed
    Joined: Nov 2, 2009
    Posts: 4,631

    TexasSpeed
    ALLIANCE MEMBER
    from Texas

    I really like the second one.. It looks more like a hot rod that way.
     
  3. Mindover
    Joined: Jan 18, 2009
    Posts: 1,645

    Mindover
    Member
    from England

    The car looks great! I prefer the second style.

    David
     
  4. Bob K
    Joined: Mar 3, 2001
    Posts: 5,772

    Bob K
    Member Emeritus
    from Antigo Wi.


    [​IMG]


    B:)B
     
  5. gnichols
    Joined: Mar 6, 2008
    Posts: 11,355

    gnichols
    Member
    from Tampa, FL

    I like the looks of roof #2. Depending on the seats and the driver's size, I think the cut-back in #2 will also give you a better view - left to right panorama-wise at stop lights and intersections - so you may not have to keep leaning forward in the saddle to check out crossing traffic. Gary
     
  6. x77matt
    Joined: Mar 2, 2004
    Posts: 812

    x77matt
    ALLIANCE MEMBER

    lookin good corey- my vote is #1 on the top. it will be way easier to make a side curtain fit on there too. i dont know how you would make a curtain work on the second one.... hmmm....
     
  7. rld14
    Joined: Mar 30, 2011
    Posts: 1,609

    rld14
    Member

    I just read this whole thread. Roadster Nirvana.
     
  8. 296 V8
    Joined: Sep 17, 2003
    Posts: 4,666

    296 V8
    BANNED
    from Nor~Cal

    why does 2 make it look chopped more
     
  9. TexasSpeed
    Joined: Nov 2, 2009
    Posts: 4,631

    TexasSpeed
    ALLIANCE MEMBER
    from Texas

    I think the longer opening allows the edge to taper lower towards the back, so it plays a trick on your eye..

    Part of the reason why I dig it.
     
  10. T&A Flathead
    Joined: Apr 28, 2007
    Posts: 1,985

    T&A Flathead
    Member

    #1 does it for me.
     
  11. Incredible build!!! I like top number 2,-but for my 2 cents, I think the top of the window opening needs to be more parallel with the top of the door, if you get what I'm saying. GREAT JOB CORY!!!!!!
     
  12. so_dak_kid
    Joined: Oct 12, 2010
    Posts: 324

    so_dak_kid
    Member

    awesome build Corey! My vote is for #1
     
  13. Malcolm
    Joined: Feb 9, 2006
    Posts: 8,036

    Malcolm
    Member
    from Nebraska

  14. Pewsplace
    Joined: Feb 10, 2007
    Posts: 2,795

    Pewsplace
    Member

    I like number 1 as it makes the car look like the early tops of Bob McGee and others. Here are a couple we have done on a 3 inch chopped windshield.
     

    Attached Files:

  15. krylon32
    Joined: Jan 29, 2006
    Posts: 9,471

    krylon32
    ALLIANCE MEMBER
    from Nebraska
    1. Central Nebraska H.A.M.B.

    Gotta go with number 1. It's in the Veda Orr style of top!
     
  16. FOURTYDLX
    Joined: Feb 22, 2006
    Posts: 718

    FOURTYDLX
    Member

    #1 Looks old school.
     
  17. What he said!!
     
  18. #1 for me as well. Incredible car!
     
  19. Bigcheese327
    Joined: Sep 16, 2001
    Posts: 6,694

    Bigcheese327
    Member

    Number One does look more 1940s hot rod, but I like Number Two better.
     
  20. gnichols
    Joined: Mar 6, 2008
    Posts: 11,355

    gnichols
    Member
    from Tampa, FL


    Oh yeah! And side curtains would not be that bad to mount as long as they only attached to the doors. Who knows, they might even seal better or spit water on your face less with the back edge further behind the door latches. Gary
     
  21. jfrolka
    Joined: Oct 4, 2007
    Posts: 898

    jfrolka
    Member

    #1 idea fits your roadster a lot better than idea #2 I think.

    Oh and how many rolls of tape did that take?
     
  22. YES on #1.
    I like the side window curve same as trunk curve.
    The Orr top is perfect I think.........cw.
     
  23. CTaulbert
    Joined: Apr 8, 2007
    Posts: 1,306

    CTaulbert
    Member
    from Detroit

    I bought 4 rolls of the cheapest masking tape that Lowe's had.....the only bad thing is that you can't get a full piece off the roll (without it tearing) for the first couple of revolutions.
     
  24. CTaulbert
    Joined: Apr 8, 2007
    Posts: 1,306

    CTaulbert
    Member
    from Detroit

    Well, I'm going with the #1 side profile - the Orr or Lee style side window.

    I laid out a couple of back windows today. I'm leaning towards #2. I like the look of the lower height (pretty much matches the smallest part of the windshield), and the extra width makes the top look less heavy in the corners.

    #1
    [​IMG]
    [​IMG]

    #2
    [​IMG]
    [​IMG]
     
  25. bardahl1
    Joined: Oct 16, 2005
    Posts: 353

    bardahl1
    Member

    #2

    Nice build

    example
     

    Attached Files:

  26. Hogman
    Joined: Nov 22, 2011
    Posts: 193

    Hogman
    Member
    from Dallas, TX

    #1 for sure. great looking ride you got there!
     
  27. Your photo took my breath away.:eek:
     
  28. bardahl1
    Joined: Oct 16, 2005
    Posts: 353

    bardahl1
    Member

    Ok, that was a lost moment... I meant top #1, like mine.

    That 2nd pic of my car was in New Zealand, on vacation.
     
  29. bardahl1
    Joined: Oct 16, 2005
    Posts: 353

    bardahl1
    Member

    Agreed. I used a '37 rear window from Labarron Bonney.... makes it a lot more user friendly
     

    Attached Files:

  30. 30TudorSedan
    Joined: Sep 20, 2007
    Posts: 382

    30TudorSedan
    Member

    Top # 1 definitely looks the part on your roadster as well as rear window # 2. Awesome looking roadster!
     

Share This Page

Register now to get rid of these ads!

Archive

Copyright © 1995-2021 The Jalopy Journal: Steal our stuff, we'll kick your teeth in. Terms of Service. Privacy Policy.

Atomic Industry
Forum software by XenForo™ ©2010-2014 XenForo Ltd.