Register now to get rid of these ads!

Oddball Gassers Question... WTF???

Discussion in 'The Hokey Ass Message Board' started by Dustyoldbodyman, Mar 17, 2009.

  1. Alright, Whats up with this Simca bodied twin mill thing?
    Does anyone know why one SBC points forward and the other points rearward? (look at the magneto on the RH engine)
    Is it the drive unit?
    Gotta love this thing - just not sure how it works. :cool::confused:
    Help me out here...
     

    Attached Files:

  2. I would think that one motor is backward so that you have reverse rotation on one side in comparison to the other. That way you can hook one to the other directly (gear to gear). Also the reverse rotation would tend to have a stabilizing effect with the engines torquing in opposite direction.

    Maybe I overthink a bit, perhaps that's how they fit best into the chassis?
     
  3. Maybe one just drives the fuel pump :D
     
  4. IIRC, it had a chain drive off the front of the right hand mill, connected to a shaft that went rearward, between the engines, where a similar system from the left hand engine connected, sending drive to a center diff. You can kinda see it through the front wheel. I remember being fascinated by the article in a magazine when I was a kid.
     

  5. Red Sled,
    Thanks - an article - on that car? cool. Looks like something E. J. Potter would try on like his old riding mower or something...
    Wow :cool::cool:
     
  6. Larry T
    Joined: Nov 24, 2004
    Posts: 7,876

    Larry T
    Member

    You might try looking for Dye and Hampton "Two Bad" Fiat Competition coupe.
    BTW Competition Coupes and Roadsters didn't have much in common with Gassers.
    Larry T
     
  7. That's not a Gasser ... it's a Competition Coupe ... the Eldon Dye & Don Hampton "Two Bad" Topolino.

    EDIT: I see that Larry T beat me to it ... I really need to learn to read & type faster! :rolleyes:

    [​IMG]
    [​IMG]
     
    Last edited: Mar 17, 2009
  8. Freiburger
    Joined: Oct 30, 2005
    Posts: 95

    Freiburger
    Member

    I thought we were not allowed to argue over labels (lol).
     
  9. RichFox
    Joined: Dec 3, 2006
    Posts: 10,020

    RichFox
    Member Emeritus

    On twin engine cars that were connected by gearing the flywheels togeather, one was reversed and the flywheel put on the front of that one, to cause the rotation to be correct for the gears. The drive went from the conventionaly mounted engine. If there is a chain driven shaft between the engines reversing one of them would be the wrong thing to do a they would be turinig in oposit directions and could not be connected with a chain.
     
  10. Larry T
    Joined: Nov 24, 2004
    Posts: 7,876

    Larry T
    Member

    Not arguing, just stating the facts. (G)
     
  11. Labels - the problem with incorrect labels is that more and more incorrect information enters the information stream and tends to become "fact".

    Charlie
     
  12. stude_trucks
    Joined: Sep 13, 2007
    Posts: 4,754

    stude_trucks
    Member

    Who cares what it is called, that thing is mean and awesome. I love it.

    Looking at that front shot, I suppose one nice thing about the twin mills is you can actually see where you are going between them. :)
     
  13. Nah-too tame!
     
  14. Rootie Kazoootie
    Joined: Nov 27, 2006
    Posts: 8,134

    Rootie Kazoootie
    Member
    from Colorado

    ...
     

    Attached Files:

  15. I think there are some in motion shots of it in the video Ryan posted yesterday too.

    JK
     
  16. Yes ... Mazooma1's 8mm film includes the Dye & Hampton twin engine Fiat at LIONS.

    Doug also posted these two color photographs of the car (shot the same day as the movie footage):

    [​IMG]

    [​IMG]
     
  17. :cool: No, it's not a gasser BUT!
    It's a future funny car!
    The car later became Hamptons twin engine American Bandstand Corvette FC.
     
  18. 2002p51
    Joined: Oct 27, 2004
    Posts: 1,362

    2002p51
    Member

    Don Hampton must have liked fooling around with twin engined cars. Here's the same set-up in his Corvette funny car around 1970.

    [​IMG]

    [​IMG]

    [​IMG]
     
  19. Mazooma1
    Joined: Jun 5, 2007
    Posts: 13,598

    Mazooma1
    Member

  20. Mazooma1
    Joined: Jun 5, 2007
    Posts: 13,598

    Mazooma1
    Member

    Don Hampton's son is here on the HAMB, BTW
    (can't remember his nickname)
    Still building blowers...
     
  21. Agreed!

    BTW ... that's a nice "Dune Buggy" pictured in your avatar! :rolleyes: ;) :D
     
  22. Man, I miss the days when this type of innovation flourished. The "box" that these guys were thinking outside of wasn't as confining as the current one.
     
  23. I got your "dune buggy"...LOL!!

    Charlie
     
  24. Muttley
    Joined: Nov 30, 2003
    Posts: 18,500

    Muttley
    Member

    Is that car still around?
     
  25. :cool:Question - Did the engines have dry sump systems? Seems like they would have to because of the mounting angles. That or some fancy oil pan and pickup tube work to keep them from starving for oil. The fuel injection doesn't care like a carb would, just hoping a fellow HAMBer can shed some light on this and/or post some pix? How about the oil draining from the top end and onto the cam through the valley (or not in this case!) ? Just curious.... Thanx:D
     
  26. autobilly
    Joined: May 23, 2007
    Posts: 3,128

    autobilly
    Member

    Labels matter because they're the best tool we have in language to accurately convey ideas.
     
  27. A-Wall
    Joined: Aug 6, 2008
    Posts: 488

    A-Wall
    Member

    I would also like to know this.

     
  28. Ya ' all are great... Thanks for clearing all this up. The more I thought about it the crazier I got. One of my painter buddies thinks its the iso cyanates - says its his problem anyway... I think about things for more than a minute and it becomes a plot... another story for another time...:rolleyes:

    so anybody make full kits for tandem engine car building, or do we all create our own? :cool:
     
  29. 2002p51
    Joined: Oct 27, 2004
    Posts: 1,362

    2002p51
    Member

    Probably because it's out in front and not between the driver's feet.

    Remember, this is 1970 before ballistic blankets on blowers, etc. to keep the magnesium rain out of the stands. :)
     
  30. Wes Hampton (click HERE for his profile).
     

Share This Page

Register now to get rid of these ads!

Archive

Copyright © 1995-2021 The Jalopy Journal: Steal our stuff, we'll kick your teeth in. Terms of Service. Privacy Policy.

Atomic Industry
Forum software by XenForo™ ©2010-2014 XenForo Ltd.