Register now to get rid of these ads!

Projects technical

Discussion in 'Traditional Customs' started by Wynne, Jun 7, 2020.

  1. Wynne
    Joined: Jul 4, 2018
    Posts: 7

    Wynne

    I have a 51 Mercury, and I need the alignment specs for it.
     
  2. squirrel
    Joined: Sep 23, 2004
    Posts: 56,043

    squirrel
    Member

  3. flatford39
    Joined: Dec 3, 2006
    Posts: 2,799

    flatford39
    Member

    My Motors Manuals are priceless to me. If you don't own one you need to buy one. They are plentiful and cheap for the world of info that is contained in them.
     
  4. Mr48chev
    Joined: Dec 28, 2007
    Posts: 33,948

    Mr48chev
    ALLIANCE MEMBER

    You want about 1/4 of a degree more Positive camber on the drivers side tire than the passenger side to compensate for the crown in the road. Drivers side meaning the legal drivers side in the country you live in. Or the side that is next to the middle line of a two lane road. That compensates for the crown in the road and helps the car track straight. Otherwise it may want to drift off to the side of the road. Depending on the amount of crown on your local roads it may take slightly more or slightly less but when it is right you should be able to run down a straight road hands off the wheel for quite a ways. That was my test after doing an alignment. the car had to track straight for more than a hundred yards on my test street a couple of blocks from the shop.
     
    loudbang, vtx1800 and pitman like this.

  5. pitman
    Joined: May 14, 2006
    Posts: 5,148

    pitman

    That's some align finesse right there.
     
    lippy likes this.
  6. Hnstray
    Joined: Aug 23, 2009
    Posts: 12,355

    Hnstray
    ALLIANCE MEMBER
    from Quincy, IL

    @Mr48chev Excellent advice.....and a touch of additional caster on the same side was common in my neck of the woods. Lots of rural two lane blacktops with lots of crown.

    Ray
     
  7. We set stuff to have half a degree of “pull” to compensate for road crown, sometimes more if it’s something heavy


    Sent from my iPhone using H.A.M.B.
     
    Elcohaulic likes this.
  8. blowby
    Joined: Dec 27, 2012
    Posts: 8,661

    blowby
    Member
    from Nicasio Ca

    Camber?
     
  9. Hnstray
    Joined: Aug 23, 2009
    Posts: 12,355

    Hnstray
    ALLIANCE MEMBER
    from Quincy, IL

    I think camber, used as directed, would exert some pull. A cambered disc (tire/wheel) if rolled on a level surface, would tend to turn in the direction of the tilt. However, more caster on one side than the other would also produce similar results. Either, or in combination, will counter a crowned road’s pull.

    Ray
     
  10. blowby
    Joined: Dec 27, 2012
    Posts: 8,661

    blowby
    Member
    from Nicasio Ca

    OK. Always thought caster was the usual method.
     
    Last edited: Jun 7, 2020
    das858 likes this.
  11. Some more modern stuff calls for camber to be used some calls for caster, I’ll use either or a combination of both depending on ease of adjustment.


    Sent from my iPhone using H.A.M.B.
     
  12. lippy
    Joined: Sep 27, 2006
    Posts: 6,825

    lippy
    Member
    from Ks

    If your that anal, your not traditional. :D
     
  13. deucemac
    Joined: Aug 31, 2008
    Posts: 1,487

    deucemac
    Member

    Back in the dark ages when I did brake and front end for a living , I would set the camber a half degree more positive on the driver side static. Most cars have only the driver in it. With the half degree set, the tire would negative that amount when the driver was in the car and match the passenger side. On caster, I would put an additional half degree of positive caster on the passenger side to compensate for road crown. Never had a customer complain of pull or excessive tire wear.
     
    loudbang and pitman like this.
  14. Bandit Billy
    Joined: Sep 16, 2014
    Posts: 12,364

    Bandit Billy
    ALLIANCE MEMBER

    o_O
     
    loudbang and lothiandon1940 like this.
  15. Elcohaulic
    Joined: Dec 27, 2017
    Posts: 2,213

    Elcohaulic


    Wow +6 3/4 degrees positive caster! No wonder those old Fords handled so well..
     
  16. Jim - do you ever think we'll get them to buy a manual ? Always take a few to the swap meet but have few buyers.......
     
  17. squirrel
    Joined: Sep 23, 2004
    Posts: 56,043

    squirrel
    Member

    why should they, when they have the internets?
     
    Desoto291Hemi and warbird1 like this.
  18. Moriarity
    Joined: Apr 11, 2001
    Posts: 31,091

    Moriarity
    SUPER MODERATOR
    Staff Member

    I trust my manuals so much more than the internet... they will have to pry them out of my cold dead hands.....I thought everyone had them....
     
  19. TrailerTrashToo
    Joined: Jun 20, 2018
    Posts: 1,293

    TrailerTrashToo
    Member

    It MUST be true, I read it on the internet...
     
  20. blowby
    Joined: Dec 27, 2012
    Posts: 8,661

    blowby
    Member
    from Nicasio Ca

    The manual would have specs for bias ply, which of course he is running as he didn't mention the R word. ;)
     
  21. Some of the most used tools that my grandfather and dad left me...
    20200608_151012.jpg
     
  22. Elcohaulic
    Joined: Dec 27, 2017
    Posts: 2,213

    Elcohaulic

    Wow 46-48 got 6 degrees positive caster with 8 degrees KPI.. Then Ford went down in 49 for easy steering and back up in 54 for better handling again... My dad always said those old Fords handled great compared to the 60s and 70s cars... He was referring to his 47 Merc, 46 Ford, 40 Ford that he had when he lived out in California after WW-II.. He said the Hot rod scene was just starting and you had to build everything..
     
    loudbang likes this.
  23. squirrel
    Joined: Sep 23, 2004
    Posts: 56,043

    squirrel
    Member

    Axles seem to need a lot more caster than IFS, eh?
     
    Elcohaulic likes this.
  24. 51504bat
    Joined: May 22, 2010
    Posts: 4,789

    51504bat
    ALLIANCE MEMBER

    Collected over the years. Can't have too many reference sources, can't always rely on Squirrel and others here on the HAMB.:cool: manuals.jpg manuals2.jpg
     
  25. Dangerousdan
    Joined: Apr 12, 2018
    Posts: 336

    Dangerousdan
    Member
    from Arizona

    Wow. All good information. I also have a 1951 Mercury with stock flathead. Question has been asked where can I locate spark plugs and what size? Also which points Cap and condenser to use and where to find? Thanks for any help.
     
  26. 51504bat
    Joined: May 22, 2010
    Posts: 4,789

    51504bat
    ALLIANCE MEMBER

    Autolite 216's are what I run in my 8ba with EAB heads. I used to run Champion H10's per my old Motors Manual but I like the Autolites better. For what its worth the H10's come packaged as lawn mower plugs. I got a cap and points from my local parts store when I had the Loadamatic distributor but I'm running a Bubba Chevy conversion now and I don't remember part numbers. If your local parts store can't help you every early Ford on line company will have them.
     
  27. 51504bat
    Joined: May 22, 2010
    Posts: 4,789

    51504bat
    ALLIANCE MEMBER

  28. 41rodderz
    Joined: Sep 27, 2010
    Posts: 6,541

    41rodderz
    Member
    from Oregon

    Exactly !! I have a couple that run back into the teens and I find just reading them interesting. It’s like a little bit of a history lesson seeing repair and adjustments fixes for teens , 20’s,30’s, and that back then they had no idea what would be ahead.
     
    Elcohaulic and Moriarity like this.
  29. A well written manual is a thing of beauty. Following the Shop Manual for 1950 Buick, I just recently rebuilt the standard transmission. I had never done one.

    Ben
     
  30. Dangerousdan
    Joined: Apr 12, 2018
    Posts: 336

    Dangerousdan
    Member
    from Arizona

    51504bat. Thanks for the Information.
     

Share This Page

Register now to get rid of these ads!

Archive

Copyright © 1995-2021 The Jalopy Journal: Steal our stuff, we'll kick your teeth in. Terms of Service. Privacy Policy.

Atomic Industry
Forum software by XenForo™ ©2010-2014 XenForo Ltd.