Register now to get rid of these ads!

Features T A I L D R A G G E R S..... again...

Discussion in 'Traditional Customs' started by kustombuilder, Apr 4, 2005.

  1. Danger
    Joined: Jun 18, 2010
    Posts: 145

    Danger
    Member

    ImageUploadedByH.A.M.B.1421633829.746836.jpg
    My OG Merc at speed week


    Posted using the Full Custom H.A.M.B. App!
     
  2. Altitude adjustment 10917854_10204908707009947_2831720776989546430_n.jpg ment...
     
  3. SJ13
    Joined: Dec 9, 2014
    Posts: 62

    SJ13
    Member
    from PNW

    what era did tail-draggers begin ? what defines a tail-dragger is this accomplished by merely lowering the rear with springs or could a car with hydraulics or bags on it raised in front and lowered in back be considered a tail-dragger
     
  4. Pre 50's. And IMHO, bags don't count.
     
  5. SJ13
    Joined: Dec 9, 2014
    Posts: 62

    SJ13
    Member
    from PNW

    I saw a 49 shoebox more door a couple weeks ago cruising thru town in a tail dragger stance , then a couple days later I saw it cruising with a level stance I'm thinkin bags ... but as the old sayin goes "rules were made to be broken"
     
  6. The car obviously wasn't built with a motorboat stance, it's just bagged, so in my book , it's not a tail dragger because it wasn't built that way...it's adjustable.

    That's also often a lame excuse for not doing things properly...and I don't just mean about trail draggers.
     
    ChuckleHead_Al and fuzzybear like this.
  7. SJ13
    Joined: Dec 9, 2014
    Posts: 62

    SJ13
    Member
    from PNW

    when judging ones opinion of what is right or wrong is neither here nor there .... one may consider the method chosen in certain situations to the said person ... unless there is a text book way of doing things then opinions are just that ...
     
    Cooon and nitrobrother like this.
  8. Nope....NO airbags allowed ;)
     
    Maverick Daddy likes this.
  9. That should be the motto of this whole site imho.
     
  10. Movinman
    Joined: Feb 20, 2005
    Posts: 1,106

    Movinman
    Member

    I love the 37 headlights on the 36. Great custom touch!
     
  11. Movinman
    Joined: Feb 20, 2005
    Posts: 1,106

    Movinman
    Member

    Just drove out to New Mexico and picked up this 1935 Packard. It already has the stance, it just needs a little bit of everything to become a driver.
     

    Attached Files:

  12. 4woody
    Joined: Sep 4, 2002
    Posts: 2,110

    4woody
    Member

    Great profile on that Packard!
     
  13. CadMad
    Joined: Oct 20, 2012
    Posts: 876

    CadMad
    Member

    I'm gonna stir the pot re airbags. hehe. GM Started playing with airbags in the 40s. I had a 59 Biarritz on factory air. It self leveled but when going over a steep driveway you could pull out the lift lever and raise up to full travel. best invention ever for the prevention of tearing up your freshly chromed bumpers.
    I'm seriously considering them on my 39 . Oh the humanity.
     
    CHUCK50DODGE, SJ13 and Movinman like this.
  14. Yes, the GM airbag story comes up every time bags and traditional building is discussed. They just didn't happen to be used on customs in 1949.;)

    A tail dragging stance is just that, the car's suspension is setup so the car sits like a moving motorboat, i.e. tail down.

    Anything adjustable isn't a stance, it is adjustable suspension or ride height...and that is a completely different thing.
     
    rat bastad likes this.
  15. Sure people were playing with bags and hydraulics way back when. But they weren't doing it to lay the frame in the dirt and make the car look like the suspension fell out, which is what 99.9% of modern air bagged cars do. Anyway we're not here to argue about air bags we're here to look at pictures of some cool tail dragging customs.
     
    SJ13, TonyVan and Olson like this.
  16. SJ13
    Joined: Dec 9, 2014
    Posts: 62

    SJ13
    Member
    from PNW

    totally agreed fuzzybear , I wasn't per say arguing the fact just stating that rollin down the road you cant tell the difference ? I myself just happened to buy a car with bags but if the car wouldn't have had them I would have still bought it , would have preferred it to be springs and shocks , I like the tail-dragger stance and give kudos to those who actually take the time and effort to do so
     
    Last edited: Jan 29, 2015
  17. J. A. Miller
    Joined: Dec 30, 2010
    Posts: 2,060

    J. A. Miller
    ALLIANCE MEMBER
    from Central NY

    Fat chicks and weak springs.
     
    Maverick Daddy likes this.
  18. Fedcospeed
    Joined: Aug 17, 2008
    Posts: 2,011

    Fedcospeed
    Member

    Exactly what Iam looking to do with my 47. SWEET!!
     
  19. Outback
    Joined: Mar 4, 2005
    Posts: 2,418

    Outback
    Member
    from NE Vic

    Plenty of inspiration here! Thanks all!
     
    droppedstepside likes this.
  20. Outback
    Joined: Mar 4, 2005
    Posts: 2,418

    Outback
    Member
    from NE Vic

    One of my favorite cars, ok I know maybe a little low in the front to be a tail dragger, but I love the way this looks!
     
    droppedstepside likes this.
  21. Drag'n 59
    Joined: Nov 13, 2006
    Posts: 501

    Drag'n 59
    Member
    from DALLAS, TX

  22. EVL401
    Joined: Sep 12, 2012
    Posts: 152

    EVL401
    Member

    ImageUploadedByH.A.M.B.1423035852.767712.jpg

    My mate's 54 Plymouth Belvedere mild custom/dragger we bagged just before Xmas 2014. Factory RHD here in Australia!!
     
  23. Bullet Nose
    Joined: Nov 20, 2001
    Posts: 2,573

    Bullet Nose
    Member

    Anyone care to add some new photos to this thread?
     
  24. ne'erdowell
    Joined: Nov 30, 2005
    Posts: 568

    ne'erdowell
    Member

    Some of these are REALLY low in the rear. Would they have a small wheel arrangement underneath to keep from scraping?
     
  25. TonyVan
    Joined: Oct 15, 2008
    Posts: 120

    TonyVan
    Member
    from Vancouver

  26. Bullet Nose
    Joined: Nov 20, 2001
    Posts: 2,573

    Bullet Nose
    Member

    I do remember some cars having casters mounted under the rear bumper for that reason.
     
  27. The Brown Sound
    Joined: Dec 18, 2014
    Posts: 131

    The Brown Sound
    Member
    from Maryland

    How many guys leave their front suspension stock height to accentuate the rake? Is that common?
     
  28. bgbdlinc
    Joined: Jan 11, 2002
    Posts: 522

    bgbdlinc
    Member

    ....I did....
    [​IMG]
     
    CHUCK50DODGE likes this.
  29. Outback
    Joined: Mar 4, 2005
    Posts: 2,418

    Outback
    Member
    from NE Vic

    Leave the front end stock height?

    Sent via carrier pidgeon & smoke signals with the HAMB App
     
  30. I'm planning on making my 41 more into a taildragger. Future plans are teardrop skirts, chop, custom hubcaps, Appleton spotlights, and drop the rear just a little more maybe. Oh,..and no airbags :).
    75%_2.jpg 100_3870.JPG
     

Share This Page

Register now to get rid of these ads!

Archive

Copyright © 1995-2021 The Jalopy Journal: Steal our stuff, we'll kick your teeth in. Terms of Service. Privacy Policy.

Atomic Industry
Forum software by XenForo™ ©2010-2014 XenForo Ltd.