Register now to get rid of these ads!

Cadillac 390 cam question

Discussion in 'The Hokey Ass Message Board' started by GARY T., Jan 3, 2012.

  1. GARY T.
    Joined: Mar 23, 2008
    Posts: 1,985

    GARY T.
    Member
    from S.W. Pa

    What is the most radical cam you can run in a 390 Caddy while still using the stock rockers,pushrods,and lifters? I want something with a lumpy idle. preferably one I can buy without having to get a custom grind

    How would this work?
    valve lift: .480/.480
    adv duration: .268/.268
    duration @50: .218..218
    centerline: 108/112
     
    Last edited: Jan 4, 2012
  2. GARY T.
    Joined: Mar 23, 2008
    Posts: 1,985

    GARY T.
    Member
    from S.W. Pa

  3. HotRodHighley
    Joined: Feb 12, 2008
    Posts: 395

    HotRodHighley
    Member
    from cincy, oh

    PM 32coupedeville on here. He has a nasty cam in his 390 Caddy. Not sure if it was a custome grind or not.
     
  4. falcongeorge
    Joined: Aug 26, 2010
    Posts: 18,341

    falcongeorge
    Member
    from BC

    If you want a rough idle, look for an LSA narrower than 112. 108 or 110 and you will want more than 218 @ 050. In the cam you listed, 108 is the installed intake centerline, 112 is the LSA. In a light car like your roadster, I would be looking for something around 230@050 on a 108 LSA, but something like that for an early cad will probably be a custom grind.
     
    Scotty's Garage! likes this.

  5. GARY T.
    Joined: Mar 23, 2008
    Posts: 1,985

    GARY T.
    Member
    from S.W. Pa

    What about this one?

    • Valve Lift (INT/EXH): .450/.450
    • ADV Duration (INT/EXH): 280/290
    • Duration @ .050" (INT/EXH): 203/203
    • Centerline (degrees): 111
    • Power Range (RPM): 1200-4700
     
  6. falcongeorge
    Joined: Aug 26, 2010
    Posts: 18,341

    falcongeorge
    Member
    from BC

    Thats even smaller than the first one. A one degree difference in LSA is not going to make up for 15 degrees less duration.
     
  7. GARY T.
    Joined: Mar 23, 2008
    Posts: 1,985

    GARY T.
    Member
    from S.W. Pa

    As you probably know by now----I get really confused when it comes to cam specs.
    :eek:
     
  8. falcongeorge
    Joined: Aug 26, 2010
    Posts: 18,341

    falcongeorge
    Member
    from BC

    Look for something around 225-230 @ .050 on a 108-110 LSA. Narrower LSA will idle rougher and have more mid-range grunt if you are comparing two otherwise identical cams.
     
  9. It's my understanding you want to get in touch with Nielson Cams([email protected])...I am building a 1962 Cad 390, for my 36 Ford coupe and have run into the same questions. I guess that is the price we pay for not using a small block Chev! I think the price on a custom grind for a Cad is about $200-250, but do not know for sure as i have not ordered mine as of yet. Please keep me posted.
     
    Scotty's Garage! likes this.
  10. shoprat
    Joined: Dec 23, 2006
    Posts: 1,109

    shoprat
    Member Emeritus
    from Orange, CA

    BITD we ran solids with adj rockeer arms;) I ran a WEBER in my 365.
     
  11. GARY T.
    Joined: Mar 23, 2008
    Posts: 1,985

    GARY T.
    Member
    from S.W. Pa

    Finally got a cam,this is the one I got----same cam that was in the HR Deluxe Caddy build,except for lobe center
     

    Attached Files:

  12. Pete1
    Joined: Aug 23, 2004
    Posts: 2,255

    Pete1
    Member
    from Wa.

    Keep in mind, Cads are notorious for eating stock cams.
    Any deviation from stock will agravate this.
     
  13. GARY T.
    Joined: Mar 23, 2008
    Posts: 1,985

    GARY T.
    Member
    from S.W. Pa

    Why would that be?????
     
  14. Pete1
    Joined: Aug 23, 2004
    Posts: 2,255

    Pete1
    Member
    from Wa.

    One reason is the base circle diameter is smaller than most cams.
    This makes for a higher rate of lift which makes for faster wear.
    The material the core is made of also affects wear and obviously
    they are not going to spend any more than is necessary for that.
    The good news is, steel cams, both flat tappet and roller stand up
    very well. The after market cast cams also do very well.
    The factory came out with an unpublished note to dealers in 1950
    that they expected in excess of 1% of the cams to fail in the first 200 miles.

    "Been in the cam business 59 years"
     
    Scotty's Garage! likes this.
  15. GARY T.
    Joined: Mar 23, 2008
    Posts: 1,985

    GARY T.
    Member
    from S.W. Pa

    Well mine is a brand new one (not a regrind) that Steve Long ground for me
    Hopefully it will be OK
     
    Scotty's Garage! likes this.
  16. Rusty O'Toole
    Joined: Sep 17, 2006
    Posts: 9,659

    Rusty O'Toole
    Member

    Pete they had a lot of trouble with cam and lifter wear on the new OHV V8s at that time. Chrysler and Studebaker as well as Cadillac. All these companies had good engineers and lots of experience building engines but they were breaking new ground with the OHV models.

    The solution turned out to be better lifters, I believe some changed to chilled iron, and adding ZDDP to the oil.

    Now that they are taking the ZDDP out of oil this is something to watch out for especially on a new cam.
     
    Scotty's Garage! likes this.
  17. GARY T.
    Joined: Mar 23, 2008
    Posts: 1,985

    GARY T.
    Member
    from S.W. Pa

    Yeh,I will use ZDDP to break the cam in and twill run Brad-Penn oil which still has it in it
     
  18. Noland
    Joined: Oct 16, 2007
    Posts: 1,235

    Noland
    Member

    I have a crower roller in My 390 from back in the 60s. Unsure of the grind. But I would think you would want some heavier valves springs and adj. rockers with chaging the cam. Also with any flat tappet cam you get new lifters for a new cam so they break in together or atleast thats what I understand.
     
    Scotty's Garage! likes this.
  19. GARY T.
    Joined: Mar 23, 2008
    Posts: 1,985

    GARY T.
    Member
    from S.W. Pa

    Got new lifters and heavier springs--don't need adj rockers unless using solids or regrind
    I have a set of Stude adj rockers if U know anyone that needs them---$150.00
     
  20. Noland
    Joined: Oct 16, 2007
    Posts: 1,235

    Noland
    Member

    I think thats how you get a lumpy idle is with solid lifter not hyd. I could be wrong. that and the right cam
     
  21. GARY T.
    Joined: Mar 23, 2008
    Posts: 1,985

    GARY T.
    Member
    from S.W. Pa

    From what I hear it is lobe center that gives the thumpy sound?????
    But I'm no expert
     
  22. Noland
    Joined: Oct 16, 2007
    Posts: 1,235

    Noland
    Member

    I think you mean lobe separation I could be wrong. I think you only get the full effect of the cam at idle is with solid lifters. hydraulic gives you a smoother idle. Like I said I could be wrong but thats what I understand.
     
  23. GARY T.
    Joined: Mar 23, 2008
    Posts: 1,985

    GARY T.
    Member
    from S.W. Pa

    I think U R right
     
  24. HEATHEN
    Joined: Nov 22, 2005
    Posts: 8,593

    HEATHEN
    Member
    from SIDNEY, NY

    It's more a matter of the camshaft's specs, not what type of lifters it uses. You can buy a hydraulic cam that will barely idle, if that's what you're into......and every stock Ford flathead and Y block had solid lifter cams from the factory, and they weren't wild grinds by any measure.
     
  25. I have about the biggest cam you can run in a 390 with stock rockers and pushrods, done by cam craft in MD, I think they are in SC now, it is in a 5200lb 1960 Cadillac convertible, and it has a lumpyish idle, but I can say with th factory tri-power, it will light the tires up right off idle. Call them, they sold me a new cam and lifters for cheap money, and it makes good power. The duration is the biggest change you can make, because of the non adjustable rockers, you are limited on the lift.
     
    Scotty's Garage! likes this.

Share This Page

Register now to get rid of these ads!

Archive

Copyright © 1995-2021 The Jalopy Journal: Steal our stuff, we'll kick your teeth in. Terms of Service. Privacy Policy.

Atomic Industry
Forum software by XenForo™ ©2010-2014 XenForo Ltd.