Register now to get rid of these ads!
  1. Hey fellas, just in case you missed it - The Rodder's Journal and The Jalopy Journal is celebrating 20 years of bringing you traditional hot rods and customs by offering you a one-year subscription to TRJ and a H.A.M.B. Alliance membership for only $75. Click here for details.

58 Chevy Rear Suspension

Discussion in 'The Hokey Ass Message Board' started by Scotch Buzzard King, Jan 24, 2010.

  1. Scotch Buzzard King
    Joined:
    Apr 28, 2007
    Posts:
    1,103
    Location:
    Amarillo, TEXAS!

    Scotch Buzzard King Member

    Okay. Someone educate me on this issue. What is different about the 58 chevy rear suspension that separates it from the 59-64 chevy rear suspension? Can it be converted to work with the 59-64 chevy stuff?
  2. J.Fishbeck
    Joined:
    Nov 6, 2009
    Posts:
    2,914
    Location:
    San Bernardino, California

    J.Fishbeck Member

    58 has a "clamshell" looking upper control arm, that attaches on both sides of the frame & one down to the rear end. It's one year only!
  3. KrisKustomPaint
    Joined:
    Apr 20, 2007
    Posts:
    1,106
    Location:
    Rhineland, MO

    KrisKustomPaint Member

    58 has a three link? thats pretty awesome.
  4. J.Fishbeck
    Joined:
    Nov 6, 2009
    Posts:
    2,914
    Location:
    San Bernardino, California

    J.Fishbeck Member

    here's a pic..

    [​IMG]
    Register now to get rid of these ads!

  5. Scotch Buzzard King
    Joined:
    Apr 28, 2007
    Posts:
    1,103
    Location:
    Amarillo, TEXAS!

    Scotch Buzzard King Member

    Are the bottom links the same though as on the 59-64? Are they the same length?
  6. torchmann
    Joined:
    Feb 26, 2009
    Posts:
    787
    Location:
    Omaha, Ne

    torchmann BANNED

    I think i remember seeing a thread last year where a hamber on a cross country run broke his rear control arm and had to have it cobbled to get home. It was either a chevy or a cadillac. It's real fuzzy. i wasn't too interested in the thread other than it was an oddball setup the guy was trying to find
  7. KrisKustomPaint
    Joined:
    Apr 20, 2007
    Posts:
    1,106
    Location:
    Rhineland, MO

    KrisKustomPaint Member

    ya i think the caddy's had a 3 link setup as well.
  8. JohnnyFast
    Joined:
    Oct 17, 2004
    Posts:
    3,274
    Location:
    Duluth, MN (Hey, Al....where's that global warming

    JohnnyFast Member Emeritus

    '58 Pontiac rear suspension was very similar.

    Attached Files:

  9. Chevy had a poor design on the 3 link in 58. Where the upper clamshell bracket attaches to the frame crossmember there was a weak weld on the brackets. The brackets would tear out of the crossmember. I had this occur on my 58 Impala, to correct i made stronger brackets. That is why they changed design of 3 link in 59.
    Last edited: Jan 24, 2010
  10. KrisKustomPaint
    Joined:
    Apr 20, 2007
    Posts:
    1,106
    Location:
    Rhineland, MO

    KrisKustomPaint Member

    generally speaking the three link is a great rear suspension set up. I think the new mustangs went to a three link, but I'm not for sure.
  11. DrJ
    Joined:
    Mar 3, 2001
    Posts:
    9,392
    Location:
    PARADISE! (Long Beach, CA)

    DrJ Member

    Just some observations....
    That high link would give it an equally high roll center in the rear.
    Combine that with a ground level roll center in front and you've got some potentially weird handling.
    The later Panhard bar setup lowers the roll center to the height of the bar mount on the frame.
  12. KrisKustomPaint
    Joined:
    Apr 20, 2007
    Posts:
    1,106
    Location:
    Rhineland, MO

    KrisKustomPaint Member

    You can put the center link on the bottom as well.
    Correct me if I'm wrong but the roll center height for a panhard bar is the average of the mounting points. Thats a bit simplified but for a general idea of where it is thats pretty close.
  13. squirrel
    Joined:
    Sep 23, 2004
    Posts:
    25,575
    Location:
    Sierra Vista AZ

    squirrel Member

    59 chevy parts book says 58-59 use different lower arms.
  14. stlouisgasser
    Joined:
    Sep 4, 2005
    Posts:
    650
    Location:
    St. Louis, MO.

    stlouisgasser Member

    '58 Chevys really do have an interesting rear suspension. New 500 horsepower Shelby GT500 Mustangs have a very similar arrangement and Dick Jesse's Altered Wheelbase MatchBash '65 GTO also had a '58 Chevy rear suspension. Back in the Nineties I can recall even seeing a Pro Mod Drag car that had a single Triangulated upper arm that attached to the rear axle housing at one central pivot point at the very top center of the housing. Add some gussets for strength and I've always thought that there might be some great potential in that rear suspension.
  15. dbradley
    Joined:
    Jan 6, 2007
    Posts:
    1,037
    Location:
    Sapulpa, OK

    dbradley Member

    I just put Global West rear arms on my '62. They are listed for '58-'64 on the lowers. The upper is '59-'64 of course. So GM may list a different # for lowers, the aftermarket arms interchange.
  16. Scotch Buzzard King
    Joined:
    Apr 28, 2007
    Posts:
    1,103
    Location:
    Amarillo, TEXAS!

    Scotch Buzzard King Member

    If the lower arms are the same length, then I have no problem reinforcing the top arm to get it all to work. I just need to know for sure that I can use 59-64 lower arms on a 58 chevy.

Share This Page

Register now to get rid of these ads!

Archive

Copyright © 1995-2013 The Jalopy Journal: Steal our stuff, we'll kick your teeth in. Terms of Service. Privacy Policy.

Atomic Industry
Forum software by XenForo™ ©2010-2014 XenForo Ltd.