Welcome to the THE H.A.M.B. forums.

You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!

Go Back   THE H.A.M.B. > General Discussion > The Hokey Ass Message Board

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 12-19-2011, 09:24 PM   #1
malaguena
Grenade Inspector
 
malaguena's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: between here and there in W.A.
Posts: 330
Default Your opinion on the ford cruise-o-matic?

So im looking at picking up a 1962 truck with the six banger with the auto attached. Ive run several of these sixes over the years and liked them. Just never a cruise-o-matic.

So were these decent? I cant seem to find much on them.
__________________
Good morning whiskey, good morning night. The end of the world is in my sight." Hank3
offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-19-2011, 10:19 PM   #2
Mr. Edsel
FNG
 
Mr. Edsel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Kern County, California
Posts: 14
Default Re: Your opinion on the ford cruise-o-matic?

Around the traditional LA Ford cultures, automatics are known as "boat anchors" or "big oily doorstops". That means they demand a lot of attention and don't give much back... except limited service life and huge overhaul bills. A typical 60's aluminum-cased Cruise-O-Matic, with minimal care, might live to 70M miles before groaning for attention.

IMHO, if ever there was a 100% perfect automatic transmission, it was the 1951-57 cast iron, air-cooled Fordomatics. With three forward speeds these indestructible workhorses would outlast the entire car. It was only when they cheapened them with water cooling lines, aluminum cases, and missing front pumps did they have a shorter (and more expensive) life expectancy.
offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-19-2011, 10:22 PM   #3
JEM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: SF Bay Area, CA
Posts: 1,015
Default Re: Your opinion on the ford cruise-o-matic?

I don't know specifically what was used in the 6cyl trucks, but the Cruiseomatics used in the Galaxies of that vintage were a perfectly good transmission.

In terms of design they outlasted their replacements - the iron Cruiseomatic begat the aluminum FMX, which begat the AOD, which begat the AOD-E/4R70W. The evolved C6, the E4OD/4R100, was never used in a car, and the C4 went away decades ago.

The biggest problem with the iron Cruiseomatics now is parts availability. All the iron Cruiseomatics were similar in basic design, but the transmissions used with 390s and up in passenger-car applications had different clutch-pack arrangements. Do not know what the trucks got.

Last edited by JEM; 12-19-2011 at 10:32 PM.
offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links (Register now to hide all advertisements)
Old 12-19-2011, 10:26 PM   #4
JEM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: SF Bay Area, CA
Posts: 1,015
Default Re: Your opinion on the ford cruise-o-matic?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mr. Edsel View Post
IMHO, if ever there was a 100% perfect automatic transmission, it was the 1951-57 cast iron, air-cooled Fordomatics.
Oh, you mean the ones that were guaranteed to overheat if you didn't regularly clean the leaves, needles, mud, etc. out of the cooling intake?

Further, the actual heat-transfer area between the air and the oil (which is what needs to be cooled) was limited to the torque converter shell. There's a reason no subsequent passenger-car automatics have been air-cooled, even though it's cheaper to build them that way.
offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-19-2011, 11:01 PM   #5
amx180mph
Grenade Inspector
 
amx180mph's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Loveland, CO
Posts: 153
Default Re: Your opinion on the ford cruise-o-matic?

I drove a 59 Thunderbird with a cruise-o-matic for 190,000 miles with out a lick of trouble. Like anything maintenance is critical on a automatic. I do not know what a" LA Ford culture" is but this redneck from Colorado has had a lot of Ford automatics in the past 40 years with few problems. If it leaks then fix the leak just like an engine it has seals and gaskets to hold in the fluid.

I know only of one problem with it is that you cannot shift into forward drive while the car is rolling backwards over 5 MPH. Doing so can damage the case.

Parts are available from these guys http://www.bulkpart.com/Merchant2/gr...og-pdf/FMX.pdf
__________________
Negativity begets hate, hate begets ignorance, ignorance begets stupidity. Don't be stupid.
offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-19-2011, 11:17 PM   #6
outlaw256
Senior Member
 
outlaw256's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: falkville al
Posts: 2,029
Default Re: Your opinion on the ford cruise-o-matic?

my 62 galaxie is my daily driver.its got 78400 on her now. i drive her everywhere. 352 with a cruise a matic. love it shifts good dont slip.leaks alittle but it sat up for almost 30yrs.i havent even gotten aroud to changing the trans filter yet. i will i just havent. oh yea ive been drivin it for 2 yrs EVERWHERE.
offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-19-2011, 11:18 PM   #7
slickhale
Member
 
slickhale's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Phoenix
Posts: 694
Default Re: Your opinion on the ford cruise-o-matic?

the common problem area on a cruise o matic is the cast iron center section cracking, as long as the case is solid they're a good trans. i had one in my galaxie that was 50yrs old and never been into, it worked perfect. dont forget to start out in the green dot
__________________
chain driven wallet, above ground pool
offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-19-2011, 11:27 PM   #8
PunkAssGearhead88
Senior Member
 
PunkAssGearhead88's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: State of Jefferson.
Posts: 1,415
Default Re: Your opinion on the ford cruise-o-matic?

I got one in my '62 Comet mated to a 200 c.i. six.

The common problems with these are flexplates like to crack around where they bolt to the converter, parts are a little tough to get, metal screen for a filter, you gotta run type F fluid, like someone else here said, DO NOT let the vehicle roll in back at any speed and throw it in drive or vice versa! That's a good way to crack the flexplates on them or break other parts inside 'em, I say this from experience.
It helps if you warm 'em up to...

I had the front pump seal on mine go out back 2005 when I was driving it daily, it was weird, I was getting on the freeway onramp, slowly got in the throttle, tranny slipped, smelled the fluid, pulled over, shut the car off right away, by then it was still too late, had to rebuild the whole trans.. But since I had it rebuilt, I've had no problems with it, and I've put A LOT of miles on it since then...
__________________
If you're hung like a horse, you don't need a Mustang.
offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-20-2011, 08:42 AM   #9
greg ducato
FNG
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Weatherford, Texas
Posts: 29
Default Re: Your opinion on the ford cruise-o-matic?

If the trans is a two speed aluminum affair it is the old 2 speed cruisomatic, not really a bad trans, but not really robust or desireable either. These were discontinued once the C4 came out in 1964 so parts are pretty scarce. If it has a cast iron main body and aluminum bellhousing and tail then it is the small or medium cased cruisomatic, which are a three forward speed transmission and fairly robust in construction and pretty durable. These get kind of a bad rap from "rebuilders" of the era that did not understand them and were ham fisted in their attempts to repair and adjust them. Either way, you will be ok behind a mild 6 cylinder driver.
offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-20-2011, 02:39 PM   #10
malaguena
Grenade Inspector
 
malaguena's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: between here and there in W.A.
Posts: 330
Default Re: Your opinion on the ford cruise-o-matic?

Well it sounds as if these were decent, but not great either. But since its already in the truck, seems to shift fine, i think ill keep it and eventually rebuild it. Im certainly not planning on using this truck as a truck anymore, more as just something to run around the town in.
__________________
Good morning whiskey, good morning night. The end of the world is in my sight." Hank3
offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-21-2011, 02:17 PM   #11
BootleggerMatt
Grenade Inspector
 
BootleggerMatt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Houston, Tx
Posts: 274
Default Re: Your opinion on the ford cruise-o-matic?

Pros cons... IMHO

Pro:
My '64 galaxie has a cruise-o-matic with a 352 and 70k miles and probably one filter change (the one I did) and shifts perfectly... and does badass burnouts... and the cool thing is you can actually push start the car if you get it rolling and throw it down into first... since it has two pumps.

Con:
If my cruise-o-matic ever stops, I don't know what I'm gonna do. I don't know much about automatics so I'd have to take it to a shop and I've heard a lot of shops wont touch it or mess it up when they do because they try to put C4 parts into it.
offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-21-2011, 04:14 PM   #12
Mr. Edsel
FNG
 
Mr. Edsel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Kern County, California
Posts: 14
Default Re: Your opinion on the ford cruise-o-matic?

[QUOTE: If the trans is a two speed aluminum affair it is the old 2 speed cruisomatic...]

With all due respect, there is no "2-speed Cruisomatic". All Fordomatics were deemed 2-speeds, despite having the optional 3rd passing gear. Or put another way, two forward from a normal shart and three forward from a rapid start.

The 3-speed Cruisomatic first appeared in 1958, optional with FE motors. The second generation Fordomatics first appeard in 1959, losing the 3rd gear. Good economical transmission but little else to recommend it.

The worst thing with "boat anchors" is they're like fresh seafood: no matter what happens, they're eventually going to go bad.

Manual transmissions - besides being more economical, versatile, safer and more reliable - will (given minimal care) last indefinitely.

Last edited by Mr. Edsel; 12-21-2011 at 04:19 PM.
offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-21-2011, 04:22 PM   #13
Mr. Edsel
FNG
 
Mr. Edsel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Kern County, California
Posts: 14
Default Re: Your opinion on the ford cruise-o-matic?

[QUOTE: There's a reason no subsequent passenger-car automatics have been air-cooled, even though it's cheaper to build them that way. QUOTE]

Wouldn't have anything to do with shorter life = more frequent trips to the dealer, would it?

Naaa.....!
offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-21-2011, 04:30 PM   #14
Mr. Edsel
FNG
 
Mr. Edsel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Kern County, California
Posts: 14
Smile Re: Your opinion on the ford cruise-o-matic?

[QUOTE: Oh, you mean the ones that were guaranteed to overheat if you didn't regularly clean the leaves, needles, mud, etc. out of the cooling intake?]

Guess we lived where we didn't park under leaves, needles, mud, etc.
offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-21-2011, 05:10 PM   #15
JEM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: SF Bay Area, CA
Posts: 1,015
Default Re: Your opinion on the ford cruise-o-matic?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mr. Edsel View Post
[QUOTE: There's a reason no subsequent passenger-car automatics have been air-cooled, even though it's cheaper to build them that way. QUOTE]

Wouldn't have anything to do with shorter life = more frequent trips to the dealer, would it?

Naaa.....!
Y'know, it's kinda funny.

I've owned a bunch of water-cooled slushboxes, including couple Cruiseomatics, a C4, a couple TH350s, a Borg-Warner 35, a Borg-Warner 37, an Aisin-Warner AW-something, a ZF 4HP18 (a transmission with a HORRIBLE reputation), a ZF 4HP22, a couple ZF 5HP24s, a couple 4L80Es, and probably others I can't think of right now.

The only one that ever broke was whatever Nissan used in the '92 Infiniti Q45 we had; it was a very strong transmission but grossly undercooled and we blew two of 'em (Nissan extended warranty more than paid for itself) in the time we had the car (by which time my wife had had enough.) Had I thought through the problem at the time an external cooler and readily-available first-gear-start software (Nissan had the things set up to start in second gear like a Benz of the day, bad idea) it'd have probably lasted a long time.

I've never broken any of the others while I owned the vehicle, and none have ever broken before 110K (the reason I use that number is that I currently own a 4L80E and a 5HP24 at 110K. which I hope last a bunch longer, and a 5HP24 at 170K.)

The only one to see any track time was the 4HP18 in a bit of road-course use.

Now, mind you, some of 'em were not what I'd call well-behaved. The Borg-Warners in particular were clunky, sluggish old things and the 4-speed ZFs had utterly crappy kickdown behavior.

But with regular fluid and filter changes they've all held up just fine (he says, crossing fingers.)

Last edited by JEM; 12-21-2011 at 05:21 PM.
offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-22-2011, 10:41 AM   #16
dawford
Member
 
dawford's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Temecula, California
Posts: 499
Default Re: Your opinion on the ford cruise-o-matic?

My Father bought 3 1965 Ford 1/2 ton pu trucks with 352 V8's and Cruse-O-Matic transmissions for his contractor business.

Those trucks were bullet proof.

They were abused for 150,000 miles or more and never had any transmission problems.

I ultimately bought the one that my uncle had and drove the wheels off it, literally.

The rear end got bent early on when the son of a supply company owner dropped a ton of sand in it from about 6 feet above the bed.

A set of wheel bearings and an axle bolster were soon installed.

About 125,000 miles later I was driving it when an axle came loose. I jacked it up and drove the axle back in with a 2 lb hammer and replaced the rear end with one from junk yard.

That was the only mechanical problem we experienced from all 3 of those trucks.

The transmissions were seldom serviced and were still very dependable.

Dick
__________________
dawford

If the first Hot Rodders were all Traditional we would still fuel with oats and hay.
offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-22-2011, 12:11 PM   #17
bobss396
Old School HAMBer
 
bobss396's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Long Island, NY
Posts: 4,533
Default Re: Your opinion on the ford cruise-o-matic?

I've had a few in '63-64 Fords and they were very good and always shifted nicely. They are also easy to rebuild, although I don't know how available some of the hard parts (outside of the rebuild kit) are.

Bob
__________________
Proud member of the "they closed my thread" HAMB crew. -- BobSS396
offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-26-2011, 08:06 AM   #18
edsel.fi
Grenade Inspector
 
edsel.fi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Southern Finland.
Posts: 240
Default Re: Your opinion on the ford cruise-o-matic?

I bought my 64 galaxie in 1994, never had any issuess with cruise-o-matic, stil shifting nicely.
__________________
1958 Edsel Pacer Convertible
1964 Ford Galaxie 500 XL Convertible
offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-26-2011, 08:23 AM   #19
Heo2
Member
 
Heo2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: northern sweden
Posts: 666
Default Re: Your opinion on the ford cruise-o-matic?

Have a mediumcase behind a 390 in my Galaxie
rebuilt it 25 years ago still no problem
The best auto i ever owned
offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-21-2012, 01:54 PM   #20
Y Block ECZ
FNG
 
Y Block ECZ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 24
Default Re: Your opinion on the ford cruise-o-matic?

Just with everything. You got to keep up with oil changes. I had mine for 12 plus years and the new owner still driving it worry free. Its built to be a good street driver and mild performer. Take care of it and it will take care of you
__________________
Don't interrupt me, punk! Don't interrupt me, don't get smart!
offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump

Sponsored Links (Register now to hide all advertisements)


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:23 AM.