|
Welcome to the THE H.A.M.B. forums. You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today! |
|
|||||||
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#1 |
|
Administrator
Join Date: Jan 1995
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 13,608
|
I found this last week and have been dreaming about it ever since. It's an idea proposed in the the January, 1958 issue of Mechanix Illustrated. Once car, multiple bodies... Brilliant. I'll let the original author (Chuck Smith) tell the story:
... To read the rest of this blog entry from The Jalopy Journal, click here. |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Old School HAMBer
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Enid OK
Posts: 4,836
|
Ryan, that would be the model T.
Unbolt the trunk and bolt on a pick-up bed. lol I used to pour over Mechanics Illustrated, Popular Mechanics, etc. when I was a kid. There were some very forward thinkers. I'm still waiting on my personal jet pack. GV
__________________
Vagabonds / Oklahoma www.vagabonds.cc http://www.pinheadlounge.com/gvgordon Are fake bull scrotums on Chrysler produced pickup trucks considered "Dodge Balls" |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Alliance Member
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: SUGAR CITY
Posts: 15,907
|
This could be done with a Sport coupe but on a much smaller scale. Roadster one day, Coupe the next. Not exactly the same thing but the thought is provoking which is why I think you posted it this morning. I like the idea of an aluminum body and engine no matter what you wrap that up in. Not sure I would have bought one though.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Alliance Member
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Atascadero, Ca.
Posts: 1,302
|
Lots of great Ideas in the 1950's...
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Old School HAMBer
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Ohio
Posts: 3,560
|
This was actually thought of years before this article by Duesenberg- to have what they called a winter body and a summer body. While the winter body was a sedan the summer body was more of an open touring car sedan.
I think this is very doable if you have more than one body (i.e. coupe and roadster) or even if you have more than one chassis and engine combo for your body. The possibilities are endless! (now if only the funds were )
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Alliance Member
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: The 51st state
Posts: 1,339
|
actually when we went to the gm heritage tour last year there was a concept car that was battery powered that they could mount different bodys to it with a couple of mounting places you could change the bodyfrom car to pick up and such
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Alliance Member
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Northern California (East Bay)
Posts: 1,079
|
It really pushes the concept of a convertible to the extreme. Cool article!
And to top it off, it should be able to connect it to the house as a cogeneration system and provide... 1) electricity to home and grid 2) heating to the home hot water system 3) heat for cooking (anyone read "Manifold Destiny?).
__________________
No car projects for now... |
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Alliance Member
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: San Antonio, TexAss, 78217
Posts: 1,010
|
I would love to see this happen. My real concern is how safe would it actually be? I know with today technology it should be super safe. but looking at those pins and sliding locks from the original design, just make me wonder what would happen in a pretty bad wreck. Say a 50 mph head on? would the body just rip off the chassis and flying? or would it all stay intact? Just my thoughts, I have had too many wrecks that were not my fault at all, and Safety has become areal issue in my life. I just had a lumbar fusion done because of a wreck in 2007. The bastard hit me head on, and was drunk to boot at 10:15 in the morning during the week. I truly love the guys thinking though, Safety is my concern. It was probably too the demise of this idea as well.
Keep em coming Ryan... Will
__________________
Will '31 Model A 5 window "Most people spend more time and energy going around problems than in trying to solve them." Henry Ford http://vagabonds.cc/ |
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Member
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Wappingers Falls, NY
Posts: 862
|
I've seen manufacturers propose this idea as well, yet it's never really come out. Why sell one multi-car when they can sell 2 (or more) dedicated cars?
My brother and I have pondered this ever since we were swapping bodies on our slot cars. I totally dig it. |
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Old School HAMBer
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Central Iowa
Posts: 4,981
|
Interesting how back then they embraced it with futuristic aluminum and today we've revisited it with electric & fuel cell concepts that are flat platforms with wheels.
As long as kids grow up playing with toy cars that have flat chassis and removeable/interchangeable bodies, there will be concepts evoking the same feature. Everyone wants to drive their toys. IMO it doesn't work in reality, look at how many late model jeep TJ/YJs have had the hardtop off once or twice in a decade. That's most em in the snowbelt.
__________________
The same........but different |
|
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
FNG
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Albuquerque NM
Posts: 27
|
Kind of like the Skateboard concept. http://www.autobloggreen.com/2007/02...ar-on-youtube/
Neat stuff.
__________________
I understand there's no victimless crimes. That being said, I feel rather victimized. |
|
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Austin Texas
Posts: 1,420
|
Heeey..thats my idea, well twenty years later. I envisioned an all purpose common wheelbased tube chassis car ready to run. Have sliding body mounts that could move around on the tubes and be pinned in place..Drop down whatever body you had ready to go at the time...
__________________
Why Sir, you are drunk!...Yes Madam, quite drunk..and you are ugly, However, In the morning I shall be sober... |
|
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
Alliance Member
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Cedar Park, TX
Posts: 149
|
Neat idea. Where can I get one?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#14 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Home of Schells, Grainbelt, Hauenstein Beer!
Posts: 1,645
|
Like the AMT 3 in 1 kits. Cool.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#15 |
|
Grenade Inspector
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Van Nuys
Posts: 166
|
How many car(s) would you have to register that as I wonder?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#16 |
|
Old School HAMBer
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Potter, Wis
Posts: 9,270
|
The article says it has a 3 piece, cast aluminum frame. Cast aluminum? I'd hate to hit anything with that.
My favorite part of the article was the introduction of the word "oftener". Seems like it caught on about as well as the car did. |
|
|
|
|
|
#17 |
|
Grenade Inspector
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Howe-Nattu Engineering, Ky.
Posts: 209
|
Only 17% of my neighborhood can cram even one car into their garage. Imagine having to store a bunch of extra bodies and the chassis to put them on. I guess this idea was meant for those with Jay Leno-sized car warehouses
![]() Hey, weren't we supposed to have flying cars by now?
__________________
a one-man stimulus package |
|
|
|
|
|
#18 |
|
Old School HAMBer
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Tweed, Australia
Posts: 2,524
|
Seems that they didn't take into account the various drive line, chassis and suspension differences required by each different example given. After all s&c geometry, spring rate, ride height, steering ratio, gear ratio, engine tune etc. is what differentiates the suitability of each car for it's intended purpose, not just body style.
Interesting to note that GM has been developing an integrated chassis/drive line designed for interchangeable bodies, although not for a quick change in the garage.
__________________
RETRO Spec. (tive) -Getting to where you're going by knowing where you've come from. |
|
|
|
|
|
#19 |
|
Grenade Inspector
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Coshocton, Ohio
Posts: 239
|
Anodized aluminum body...NEAT!
|
|
|
|
|
|
#20 |
|
Alliance Member
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Oslo, Norway
Posts: 1,638
|
That's a really cool concept! That's what tucker wanted with his carioca too! And if I don't remember wrong Vince Gardner wanted to make a kit car out of his Vega too that you easily could swap body parts on....none of these cars went into production, but has anyone seen any cars actually produced that you could easliy swap bodies on like this?
Here is the carioca ![]() And here is the Vega |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|