|
Welcome to the THE H.A.M.B. forums. You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today! |
|
|||||||
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#1 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Toronto
Posts: 1,910
|
Okay,...I want to run a T-5 behind a SBC but I don't want the one from a Camaro that's cocked over. I'll use a tailshaft from an S-10 to get the shifter where I need it,...so what car should I get the trans from?,...5.0 Mustang?,...4.3 S-10?,....please enlighten!
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Alliance Member
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Hutto, Texas
Posts: 3,541
|
with the s10 tailshaft and a straight-up bell housing, the camaro unit is quite normal. You can't use the mustang unit with the SBC, and the s10 unit won't be a good match if you build for more than 200 or so HP. ANY GM T5 is limited to about 260 ft/lb of torque.
__________________
"We promote honesty on the HAMB. As such, we don't allow politics." Ryan Cochran
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Toronto
Posts: 1,910
|
Is the Camaro T-5 considered a "World Class" trans and can it take more than 260 ft/lbs of torque?....What bellhousing should I use?
Last edited by McKee; 01-03-2008 at 02:40 AM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Western NY hillbilly
Posts: 1,378
|
1988 is the first year of World Class Camaro T-5's,it's also the one,maybe 89 too,with a mechanical speedo drive.The WC tranny differs cause it has the gears running on needle bearings,this makes it more durable in the long run but not necessarily stronger.It's the gear material that gives the tranny it's torque rating.Supposedly,WC Camaro T-5's are good for about 290- 300 ft lbs of torque.But 3rd gear,Camaro or Mustang,is the weak link.If you avoid full throttle shifts and teenage burnouts,it'll hold up ok behind a moderately built V-8
You can buy custom stronger gear sets,expensive,or a Camaro T-5 can be upgraded to 330 ft lbs of torque by using the Mustang factory high nickle gears with a 2.95 first gear.You keep the Camaro input shaft only,use the Mustang gearset. The 3rd gear is durability is supposedly greatly improved.These are available for 350 bucks or so fron the Gearbox Shop in Michigan. |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Old School HAMBer
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: co. springs
Posts: 3,696
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Member
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Daytona Beach
Posts: 685
|
...
Last edited by TimDavis; 02-08-2009 at 10:53 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
BANNED
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Saint Francis, MN
Posts: 1,323
|
Agreed on the Tremec. You're gonna find that T-5's are pretty weak transmissions from the factory, especially when you consider that a used transmission is always a HUUUUUUUUUUUGE risk.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Alliance Member
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Independence, mo, usa
Posts: 2,963
|
Ok, how much do the Tremecs run?
What are they in? r
__________________
Every once in a while, life gets a little more surreal. Some men aren't looking for anything logical, Some men just want to watch the world burn. www.alarmandmuster.com Need 26-7 T coupe doors |
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Toronto
Posts: 1,910
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Alliance Member
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: San Jose, CA
Posts: 2,042
|
ah.... just gear the rear to match your highway speed need, fill the spaces in between with horsepower and put in a Muncie :-)
-scott noteboom |
|
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: ontario
Posts: 1,532
|
McKee...........PM sent.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
Member
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Madison, WI
Posts: 993
|
Camaro t5's can run either mech or electric speedos. To change to a mech, just get speedo parts from a 83-87.
S10 versions are either one or the other, unfortunately. So look for a 83-87 S10 T5 if you want to convert and retain a mech speedo. Which bellhousing to use depends on what size of flywheel you want to run???
__________________
Aluminum without fins is like a Playboy without pictures... |
|
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Toronto
Posts: 1,910
|
Would a T-5 from an S-10 be strong enough?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#14 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: manteca,cal
Posts: 1,779
|
i put a 83 s-10 trans wiith the stock bellhouseing & 10 inch clutch with a s-10 9 11/16 disc, in a 55 chevy, now i have to change the rearend gears,1st is like granny low now
__________________
payasos cc |
|
|
|
|
|
#15 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Madison, WI
Posts: 993
|
Quote:
Thats because you're using one with a 4.03 first gear. A 3:36 or 3:55 rearend gear will work fine and are not difficult to come by for the 55-64 rearends. Some T5's from an 4.3 S10 should have a 3.76 first gear, which is just about ideal for most applications.
__________________
Aluminum without fins is like a Playboy without pictures... Last edited by Snarl; 01-03-2008 at 03:04 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#16 |
|
Member
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Madison, WI
Posts: 993
|
Strong enough for what? how much abuse is it going to see?
I've built both S10 and V8 Camaro NWC T5's, and the only difference with the V8 ones is the diameter of the input shaft, just at the splines only, and the 4th gear is larger in diameter. All the bearings are the same. In my opinion, the V8 version is only marginally stronger than the S10 version. As everybody has basically said before, more than about 250 hp and it won't be a question of IF, but WHEN you will break it. Doesn't matter which T5 you use, its the same story. If you don't abuse it, it can live for a long time. GM never used it behind a 350 for a reason, just the 305 and the typical pony car driver was still capable of breaking it. I'm not saying you shouldn't use it, just trying to be practical about what you should expect. If you want to impersonate John Force, spend the bucks and get a Tremec or Richmond. They are now making them with overdrive. Just my opinion...
__________________
Aluminum without fins is like a Playboy without pictures... |
|
|
|
|
|
#17 | ||||
|
Tech Editor
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Redmere, Cambs
Posts: 7,756
|
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Most of these links are focused on the flathead conversion, but the info is generally applicable to any T5 conversion: http://www.jalopyjournal.com/forum/s...d.php?t=169265
__________________
Daddy always said, If yer gonna be dumb, ya gotta be tough! - And I'm one tough sumbitch! T5 Tech |
||||
|
|
|
|
|
#18 |
|
Alliance Member
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Hutto, Texas
Posts: 3,541
|
I ditched the T5 for a NEW Muncie with OD 4th from Auto Gear. Very pleased with the unit they sent and got it fast. Look 'em up.
__________________
"We promote honesty on the HAMB. As such, we don't allow politics." Ryan Cochran
|
|
|
|
|
|
#19 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Western NY hillbilly
Posts: 1,378
|
I believe the T-5 was never used behind a 4.3 S10.The 5 speed 4.3 S10 option was delayed until about 1991,the 4.3 option first offered in 89 on S10's. I had a 91,it was the NV3500 5 speed with intergal clutch housing.There where some 85-86 4.3 Astro vans with T-5's,3.76 first gear.
There's some aftermarket gear makers saying their gear sets can handle 500 hp when installed in a NWC T-5 case,about 1000-1500 bucks.To me, the case seems a little lightweight to handle such power ...................................... |
|
|
|
|
|
#20 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Madison, WI
Posts: 993
|
Quote:
Yes, I know. He said it was from an '83, and judging by his description, its got a 4.03 first. If its not, I'll owe you a beer...
__________________
Aluminum without fins is like a Playboy without pictures... |
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|