Register now to get rid of these ads!

1927 Ford Roadster

Discussion in 'The Hokey Ass Message Board' started by Ryan, May 4, 2007.

  1. Ryan
    Joined: Jan 2, 1995
    Posts: 21,666

    Ryan
    ADMINISTRATOR
    Staff Member

    Last edited by a moderator: Jun 1, 2014
    kidcampbell71 likes this.
  2. I`ve always loved the `27 and your right when put on a set of deuce rails they seem to take on a totally different stance and look....a good example is the tardel/walling T.....

    heres one from over here in the UK

    [​IMG]


    monkey
     
  3. Thresher
    Joined: Jan 31, 2007
    Posts: 134

    Thresher
    Member
    from Austin, TX

    Well, that cinches it - gonna do that deuce grill thing for sure NOW! :)
     
  4. Omega
    Joined: Jul 11, 2006
    Posts: 874

    Omega
    Member
    from Mass

    The model T of 26-27 is my favorite. But stock without fenders they are ruler straight at the bottom, the deuce rails suit it perfect, it gives it more character and makes it flow more.
     

  5. ROBERT JAM
    Joined: Nov 13, 2002
    Posts: 1,261

    ROBERT JAM
    Member

    What modifications to the 32 frame have to be made to get it to fit body? Is this covered in Tardels book? I've always like the 27 body but they are to thin on stock type rails.This one looks great! Roadsters you got to love them.
     
  6. Levis Classic
    Joined: Oct 7, 2003
    Posts: 4,066

    Levis Classic
    Member

    The 26/27 T roadster is just a wonderful body style. I love them in a "highboy" manor, too many are channeled these days.
     
  7. Really need to shorten the Deuce shells though. Mmm, they're on my list.
     
  8. PeteFromTexas
    Joined: Apr 4, 2007
    Posts: 3,837

    PeteFromTexas
    Member

    I READ IN AN OLD MAGAZINE FROM THE 50'S (I DON'T REMEMBER WHICH ONE) THE 32 FRAME HAS A SLIGHT CURVE TO IT AND THE "T" BODY IS FLAT ON THE BOTTOM. A LOT OF GUYS WERE USING A TYPE OF SHIM TO FILL THAT GAP. BUT THEN OTHERS WERE JUST CHANNELING THE BODY OVER THE FRAME JUST A BIT TO FILL THE GAP. I COULD BE WRONG THOUGH.
     
  9. Jack Luther
    Joined: Oct 24, 2005
    Posts: 531

    Jack Luther
    Member

    26-27 roadster on 32 rails is hard to beat, but even harder to fit into if you're my size (i've tried, believe me, I've tried hard).
     
  10. fab32
    Joined: May 14, 2002
    Posts: 13,985

    fab32
    Member Emeritus

    I agree, the '27 roadster on '32 rails is a hot rod classic. Now, for those (like myself) that haven't pushed away from the table soon enought (++size) there is the Shadow rods XL27 roadster body. It's a little pricey but in todays market what isn't. The nice thing is that it's designed to fit on a stock dimentioned '32 frame. It's wider , taller and longer. If you get a chance where there is one at a show, sit in it, you'll be amazed how comfortable it is.
    It's also brand new steel (no rust repair and extensive body work), with a rust prevention coating that's vertually ready for paint thanks to the strict finish the panels are stamped to.

    Frank
     
    kidcampbell71 likes this.
  11. JimA
    Joined: Apr 1, 2001
    Posts: 4,795

    JimA
    BANNED

    Is that the car that was on the cover of HONK! with a dog in the driver's seat?
     
  12. Muttley
    Joined: Nov 30, 2003
    Posts: 18,500

    Muttley
    Member

    I think that was a '32.
     
  13. Ryan
    Joined: Jan 2, 1995
    Posts: 21,666

    Ryan
    ADMINISTRATOR
    Staff Member

    I'm pretty sure this was on the cover of a '51 or '52 issue of Hop Up... I remember it being a straight on shot... and a profile shot of a custom displayed under it...

    This is from memory though. I could be wrong.
     
  14. junk runner jr
    Joined: Dec 21, 2001
    Posts: 456

    junk runner jr
    Member

    I couldn't agree more Ryan. Its been eight years since I started mine. Maby someday it will be on the road.

    The stock 32 frame needs to have more curve put in to it to match the profile of the body. A few well placed cuts on the upper and lower lip of the fame before the boxing plates are welded in and that is easily taken care of. As mentioned the top of the 32 rails have a small kick up in them and the bottom of the T body is flat. Instead of using shims to take up the gap I modified the bottom flange of the body. Since my body is glass it was probably easier than on a steel body but the same principal could be applied. After loosly bolting the body to the frame I determined where the kick up in the frame started and marked the body. Then from the inside at the bottom of the cowl where it turns inside forming a flange that sits on the frame. I made a cut from the cowl back to the mark on the body where the frame starts its kick up. This allowed the cowl to slip down over the frame rails. I cut off the wedge shaped flap of cowl that is now hanging below the top of the frame. Lastly I glassed the flange back to the cowl. Now the bottom of the body has the same kick up as the frame and no shims are needed. I don't have and pics with me now but I will post some up later tonight.
     
  15. SUHRsc
    Joined: Sep 27, 2005
    Posts: 5,093

    SUHRsc
    Member

    this may be the one your thinking of ryan???
    its the only one i have saved here at work but it meets your description
    [​IMG]
    [​IMG]
     
    kidcampbell71 likes this.
  16. Boy, that is sweet. Thanks for sharing. I'm saving these to my inspiration file. Got ALL the pieces collected; just need to go ahead and retire.
     
  17. JimA
    Joined: Apr 1, 2001
    Posts: 4,795

    JimA
    BANNED


    Close, but that's a different car- I thought that was the cover Ryan was thinking of.
     
  18. alchemy
    Joined: Sep 27, 2002
    Posts: 20,505

    alchemy
    Member

    That Hop Up roadster is the Eddie Dye 29.
     
  19. SUHRsc
    Joined: Sep 27, 2005
    Posts: 5,093

    SUHRsc
    Member

    yeah i wanted to add that it was the dye car...sorry
    i just thought from memory of the covers that might stick out since it had the duvall
     
  20. modernbeat
    Joined: Jul 2, 2001
    Posts: 1,296

    modernbeat
    Member
    from Dallas, TX

    I saw almost that exact car that Ryan's writing about at the Kansas Kustom Spectacular back in '99 (or was it '98??). The dash was different and the windshield was a little more square.

    Bob Wilson's hotrod is a '27 on a '32 chassis. His has a Desoto Hemi in it though...

    The only photographs I have of it are closeups. Someone has to have a pic of Bob and Big Rick stuffed into it during the ShopRag Garage Crawl.

    [​IMG]

    [​IMG]
     
  21. Ryan
    Joined: Jan 2, 1995
    Posts: 21,666

    Ryan
    ADMINISTRATOR
    Staff Member

    Nope... that's not the one I am thinking of... I'll find it when I get home... For some reason my mind is telling me it was a 1951 issue... and the camera angle was literally straight on at axle level.

    I've got every issue of Hop Up ever printed, so I'll find it.
     
  22. Hakoval Traedz
    Joined: Aug 6, 2005
    Posts: 63

    Hakoval Traedz
    Member

    My 27 is still a pile of parts, but I remember reading about some tricks to improve interior room, leg room etc. Can anyone with experience share techniques? I'd planned to modify the rear bulkhead for a little more butt room, and lower the floor between the frame rails for more foot room. What else?
     
  23. junk runner jr
    Joined: Dec 21, 2001
    Posts: 456

    junk runner jr
    Member

    I dropped my floor between the rails two inches. Its not much but it helps. The way I have it set up the driving position is with legs bent and the seat back is layed back some. It should end up fairly comfortable. You do kind of get the feeling your wearing it rather than driving it. The only thing protruding above the cockpit is the tops of my shoulders and my head. Oh I am 6' 300lbs.
     

  24. so have I....september `51


    its the issue that had the coolest `34 ever on page 9


    monkey
     
  25. Hakoval Traedz
    Joined: Aug 6, 2005
    Posts: 63

    Hakoval Traedz
    Member

    What about foot room? Are you running 3 pedals? Cowl steering?
     
  26. 50Fraud
    Joined: May 6, 2001
    Posts: 10,101

    50Fraud
    Member

    Surf Monkey is correct; Hop Up #2, 9/51. I've looked at those pictures for 56 years, and never noticed the striping until Ryan pointed it out. That's 3 years before Von Dutch started appearing in the hot rod press!

    Jim, I believe the roadster-with-dog in Car Craft was Balchowsky's deuce, back when it had a flathead Cadillac in it.
     
  27. i ran 3 pedals in mine and it became an art form on how to control all 3 with one foot....add to that being 6` 2" my knees were wrapped around the steering wheel (which i changed from a 15" banjo to a 13" grant)....i felt like a rhino on a rollerskate....fun car but i have to ask `how tall were people in 1926/7`


    monkey
     
  28. Hakoval Traedz
    Joined: Aug 6, 2005
    Posts: 63

    Hakoval Traedz
    Member

    From the look of the Coupes, people were a lot longer in the top half in those days.
     
  29. 34Chrysler
    Joined: Dec 16, 2005
    Posts: 300

    34Chrysler
    Member

    I am 6'4" so I know I would not fit! cool pix though
     
  30. SUHRsc
    Joined: Sep 27, 2005
    Posts: 5,093

    SUHRsc
    Member

    here you go
    [​IMG]
    [​IMG]
     
    kidcampbell71 likes this.

Share This Page

Register now to get rid of these ads!

Archive

Copyright © 1995-2021 The Jalopy Journal: Steal our stuff, we'll kick your teeth in. Terms of Service. Privacy Policy.

Atomic Industry
Forum software by XenForo™ ©2010-2014 XenForo Ltd.