Register now to get rid of these ads!

Technical BRAKES, Buick drums on Chevy backing plates?

Discussion in 'The Hokey Ass Message Board' started by RileyRacing, Dec 31, 2003.

  1. Can you mount Buick drums on big Chevy backing plates, etc. I have the entire brake assembly from my 64 Impala (I rebuilt them before I got rid of the car) and was wondering if I can use them drums?

    Jay
     
  2. Andy
    Joined: Nov 17, 2002
    Posts: 5,121

    Andy
    Member

    Sorry, The Chevy is 11 in and the Buick is 12 in. Some of the mid 70's GM station wagons had 12 in in the back. Might try that.
     
  3. Bummer. Thanks though!

    Jay
     
  4. sixpac
    Joined: Dec 15, 2002
    Posts: 553

    sixpac
    Member
    from Courtenay

    I used 59 buick backing plates and drums on the early ford spnidles. A lot of work but sure nice with 12 inch barakes. Looks great. U need spacers and some machine work to get the spindle to mount to the backing plate. Some of the guys on here have the templale design for the adapters I do not have a scaner working so I cant post for you. Pretty straight forward to do. John
     

  5. Yes, I've seen those spacers. They are purdy. [​IMG] I just had these brakes lying around and wondered if I could use em. Just rebuilt everything.

    Jay
     
  6. Andy
    Joined: Nov 17, 2002
    Posts: 5,121

    Andy
    Member

    FWIW I modified 48 backing plates to accept the 71-76 GM big wagon rear brakes. Got self energizers and self adjusters and great parts availability.
     

    Attached Files:

  7. Mart
    Joined: Mar 3, 2001
    Posts: 4,900

    Mart
    Member

    Andy, can you give us an idea of what was involved in the conversion to self energising??
    Thanks,
    Mart.
     
  8. Andy
    Joined: Nov 17, 2002
    Posts: 5,121

    Andy
    Member

    I had to remove all the pins and stuff at the bottom of the backing plate along with the adjusting cams. I welded a plate to mount the wheel cyl and added another plate to mount the anchor pin. If I did it again I would use front wheel cyls. and anchor pins. The anchor pin would mount the wheel cyl and would be simpler. Danny Graham copied this and likes it.
     
  9. Rude Dude
    Joined: Dec 14, 2003
    Posts: 356

    Rude Dude
    Member

    Andy do you pics of conversion, I mean pics of backing plate witout drum installed?
     
  10. Andy
    Joined: Nov 17, 2002
    Posts: 5,121

    Andy
    Member

    I'll have to pull a wheel. Nothing really to see. Stock GM everything and some flat stock welded at the top. Will try to get a pic later today.
     
  11. Rude Dude
    Joined: Dec 14, 2003
    Posts: 356

    Rude Dude
    Member

    Thanks Andy the reason I asked is cause I just bought all the set up to install Hubs,backing plate and buick drums. I wanna go with self adjusters
     
  12. Thanks for that info, Andy. Nice work, btw. [​IMG]

    Jay
     
  13. Andy
    Joined: Nov 17, 2002
    Posts: 5,121

    Andy
    Member

    Here's a pic inside. It's dirty from a lot of use.
     

    Attached Files:

  14. Rude Dude
    Joined: Dec 14, 2003
    Posts: 356

    Rude Dude
    Member

    Thanks again Andy really appreciate you doing that
     
  15. Stovebolt
    Joined: May 2, 2001
    Posts: 3,534

    Stovebolt
    Member

    Thanks heaps Andy. Its just what I was looking for. Do you see any difficulties with "trimming" the shoes so as to fit early Ford 12" drums instead of the Buick as seen on your conversion?

    now the big question - how easy is it to find that sort of stuff in the US? Its near impossible to find that stuff in Australia!!! [​IMG]
     
  16. Andy
    Joined: Nov 17, 2002
    Posts: 5,121

    Andy
    Member

    You could start with other shoes. I think Chevy pick up is 2". Could be ground down to 1 3/4.I never looked for 1 3/4. The parts are cheap and available here. All my stuff came from Auto Zone.I think all the springs and adjusters were $15 total. Shoes were about $8. I spent a lot more for the cyls. but would use the front type next time. They are $10-20 ea.
     
  17. Rude Dude
    Joined: Dec 14, 2003
    Posts: 356

    Rude Dude
    Member

    Andy are you talking Impalas wagons are there alot without disc in front?
     
  18. Andy
    Joined: Nov 17, 2002
    Posts: 5,121

    Andy
    Member

    What my stuff came from is 71-76 Caprice etc. wagons in the REAR. Also some big Caddies in the rear.
     
  19. A-Bomb
    Joined: Jan 19, 2003
    Posts: 306

    A-Bomb
    Member

    Andy, Are you still using the early ford hubs like is normally done with a buick drum to 48 ford conversion.Also, What front wheel cylinders would you have used? (early chev front drum, etc.) What you have done looks like the way to go-much cheaper and reliable.Good Job! Dale
     
  20. Andy
    Joined: Nov 17, 2002
    Posts: 5,121

    Andy
    Member

    When I started, I was using the stock 48 brakes and the 48 hubs. Regular set up. I converted the backing plates to this set up.You can't use the 40 style plates. If I do it again I would use front wheel cyls. Don't know which ones.Probably something from a Chevy truck. Need a 1 1/8 or 1 3/16 or so that mounts with the tab.The stock Buick comes to mind.
     
  21. Stovebolt
    Joined: May 2, 2001
    Posts: 3,534

    Stovebolt
    Member

    So Andy, would I be right in saying that there are no clearance issues between the Buick drums and the shoes.

    Normally when you use 1 3/4" Ford shoes and buick drums you must machine the outer lip of the steel braking suface of the drum for clearance. By using the GM stuff, then to drum would sit 1/4" further out?? [​IMG], and require a spacer to sit b/w the hub and the drum?
    Or am I paranoid, and should I just shut up! [​IMG]
     
  22. Andy
    Joined: Nov 17, 2002
    Posts: 5,121

    Andy
    Member

    When machining the Buick drum for the Ford backing plate, only the aluminum should be removed.If the lip is cut off square, the Ford and other shoes will not be completely covered and the shoe will hang off the end of the drum. I cut the al. down to the iron lining and a little to the back to make sure there is clearance. No spacers should be needed.
     
  23. Rude Dude
    Joined: Dec 14, 2003
    Posts: 356

    Rude Dude
    Member

    Hey Andy wanna due a tech on one of my backing plates
     
  24. Mart
    Joined: Mar 3, 2001
    Posts: 4,900

    Mart
    Member

    Andy, mind if I ask another question? Why are the 40 style backing plates not suitable?
    Thanks in advance,
    Mart.
     
  25. Andy
    Joined: Nov 17, 2002
    Posts: 5,121

    Andy
    Member

    The 48 style plates have pads that the shoes can ride against just like modern backing plates. The 40's didn't have them. I guess pads could be welded up and faced off. The 48 plates had clips that held the shoes against the plates just like modern shoes with hold down springs.








     
    Kan Kustom and Upchuck like this.
  26. Kan Kustom
    Joined: Jul 20, 2009
    Posts: 2,740

    Kan Kustom
    Member

    Thanks for sharing this.
     

Share This Page

Register now to get rid of these ads!

Archive

Copyright © 1995-2021 The Jalopy Journal: Steal our stuff, we'll kick your teeth in. Terms of Service. Privacy Policy.

Atomic Industry
Forum software by XenForo™ ©2010-2014 XenForo Ltd.