|
Welcome to the THE H.A.M.B. forums. You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today! |
|
|||||||
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#1 |
|
FNG
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Dayton, TN.
Posts: 10
|
Hi, guys I'm confused about the VIN number I found on the frame rail of my truck. The VIN number is 87HY17235. I know the 8 is 1948, the 7 six cylinder, HY F3 3/4 ton heavy duty, 17235 is probably the build number. Pretty simpe so far right. Ok here is where all the confusion comes into play. Everything I've been able to find says a F3 3/4 ton has a 122" wheelbase, F1 1/2 ton has a 114" wheelbase. My truck however has a 112" wheelbase. I have looked at the frame from bumper horn to bumper horn I can't find any evidence of any modifaction done to the frame. It has the correct cab on it, and a short bed. I did find a tag on the firewall on the passenger side of the cab, the only thing I could find on it is the letters ATL. I assume this probably stands for Atlanta assembly plant. I have pics of the VIN number on the frame rail, as well as pics of the inside of the cab, the bed, and the rearend. I will gladly post these of they may help in anyway. Thank You in advance for any and all help. Confuesd H.A.M.B.er in Tennessee
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Member
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Easton, Pa
Posts: 968
|
I would check that number stamping real close. The F3 had a longer and heaver frame then the F1. Is the plate still inside the glove box. If so check those numbers
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
FNG
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Dayton, TN.
Posts: 10
|
No the plate from the glove box is missing. I'm adding a couple pics that may help.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Member
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Enderby B,C. Canada
Posts: 761
|
I believe the 112" would be a 114" wheel base , as you load the truck the front shackles swing forward and the rear shackles swing rearward increasing the wheelbase, and at best the Ford measurement were at an approximation.
__________________
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=06tDUQ3u0mg |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Grenade Inspector
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: New Berlin Wisconsin
Posts: 226
|
I have a 50 F1 but I'm no expert but I thought all the 3/4 tons all had the longer bed?I'm sure someone on here will have a answer for you.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
FNG
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Dayton, TN.
Posts: 10
|
Thanks guy's I'll keep searching and keep you all updated.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
FNG
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Dayton, TN.
Posts: 10
|
I'm kinda gathering that the 48 F3's may be 8 lug instead of 5. Anyone know about this?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 | |
|
Grenade Inspector
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Burley WA
Posts: 128
|
Quote:
Also check out the 48-56 section of Ford Truck Enthusiasts, they have all the info you could ever want on these trucks. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
FNG
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Dayton, TN.
Posts: 10
|
Thank You very much GreasyKnight. I will definitly check them out. I was kinda thinking along your line about the stamp someone just got sloppy, or lazy.
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|