Register now to get rid of these ads!

Hot Rods Center X cross member

Discussion in 'The Hokey Ass Message Board' started by earlyv8, Dec 20, 2014.

  1. earlyv8
    Joined: Jan 13, 2007
    Posts: 194

    earlyv8
    Member
    from oklahoma

    Greetings

    Has anyone on this forum used the Clarke hot rod shop 32 center X cross member?

    From what I can see, looks like you can use an un-split front wishbone and possibly a 39 Ford pedal assembly. Pedal location is also important to me. One other feature looks like a early Ford or perhaps other transmission could be removed from the rear rather than pulling the engine. I am also hopeful it would work in an unboxed frame.

    Not traditional but still looks to be Ford parts friendly.

    Appreciate any comments from experienced users of this or similar products. I understand Industrial Chassis has a high quality X cross member, and so does Chassis Engineering. Dagel does as well but they do not appear to be as adaptable to early Ford parts.

    Jack
     
  2. big duece
    Joined: Jul 28, 2008
    Posts: 6,830

    big duece
    Member
    from kansas

    They sure look like the Chassis Engineering setup. I have use Chassis Eng. and like their products.
     
  3. need louvers ?
    Joined: Nov 20, 2008
    Posts: 12,903

    need louvers ?
    Member

    I just bought an Industrial Chassis unit for a client the other day.... In my opinion there is no other way to go about it! Get ElPolacko's pedal kit too and you'll have the best of the best.

    I am kind of a ringer, truth be told, as Steve is an old friend of mine of better than 25 years. I have watched his development of this product from start to finish and it is nothing short of phenomenally designed and stiffens a '32 frame like nothing else. Whether you go with his complete X or the legs that bolt to the stock K member, I am convinced that you are getting something that is far better designed and built than ANYTHING else on the market by far. ... And yes, I have used other's kits as well.
     
  4. Pewsplace
    Joined: Feb 10, 2007
    Posts: 2,795

    Pewsplace
    Member

    I thought they were made by them but maybe not. My neighbor used the set up and it worked just fine. They have the features you want that CE doesn't. They have a good reputation for quality parts.
    IMG_5202-150x150.jpg IMG_5198-150x150.jpg
     

  5. thirtytwo
    Joined: Dec 19, 2003
    Posts: 2,639

    thirtytwo
    Member

    image.jpg I've used CE stuff on a bunch of cars and make my own center bulkhead then modify ford pedals or use ansen
     
  6. need louvers ?
    Joined: Nov 20, 2008
    Posts: 12,903

    need louvers ?
    Member

    Bingo thirtytwo! The center bulkhead is going to be key in this deal. Without it, the frame would still be quite lively as far as torsional movement.
     
  7. thirtytwo
    Joined: Dec 19, 2003
    Posts: 2,639

    thirtytwo
    Member

    Yep I kinda copy CE's concept but make it fit the trans whether it be a Muncie shifter box or a 5spd those little gussets they put in to tie in the top plate is where a lions share of the strength comes from... Then having the bolt on plate directly on bottom...

    Brookville and the one Lynn posted look a little flexy to me ...CE stuff is probably a little crude by today standards but i think still sanitary...I like that it is very simple and straight forward, they could be selling a lot more x members if they had a manual trans option

    Your right though ind. chassis is nice stuff I'm just too cheap ... It's the german/Minnesotan in me!
     
  8. thirtytwo
    Joined: Dec 19, 2003
    Posts: 2,639

    thirtytwo
    Member

    Or ... Since you are in Oklahoma just buy a later chassis and use the guts and pedals.. Done a few like this also image.jpg
     

Share This Page

Register now to get rid of these ads!

Archive

Copyright © 1995-2021 The Jalopy Journal: Steal our stuff, we'll kick your teeth in. Terms of Service. Privacy Policy.

Atomic Industry
Forum software by XenForo™ ©2010-2014 XenForo Ltd.