Register now to get rid of these ads!

Projects Early 32 roadster build with a bunch of questions!

Discussion in 'Traditional Hot Rods' started by 31pickemup, Oct 29, 2014.

  1. I've noticed over the years you always like to chime in how your street rod is vastly superior to a traditional hot rod

    But you never offer examples of why...

    ....It's like your trying to convince yourself more than anyone.

    Can you please tell us why he'll never find parts for his flathead or running gear?

    I do believe you were right about this a long time ago. But with the invention of cell phones and the Internet I think things have changed.

    Posted using the Full Custom H.A.M.B. App!
     
    Last edited: Oct 30, 2014
    WiredSpider likes this.
  2. alchemy
    Joined: Sep 27, 2002
    Posts: 20,522

    alchemy
    Member



    Yes. I also know that a breather on the pan is a good chassis rust preventative.
     
  3. NealinCA
    Joined: Dec 12, 2001
    Posts: 3,155

    NealinCA
    Member

  4. Bruce Lancaster
    Joined: Oct 9, 2001
    Posts: 21,681

    Bruce Lancaster
    Member Emeritus

    Go look at Neal's recent rebuild articles on a '32 Fordor. Informative and inspirational!
     
  5. banjorear
    Joined: Jul 30, 2004
    Posts: 4,485

    banjorear
    Member

    Thanks B&S. Still mulling over whether or not to get of the LZ's. I'll let you know.
     
  6. xix32
    Joined: Jun 12, 2008
    Posts: 596

    xix32
    Member

    About brakes: The simplest would be pure Henderson, stock `32 Ford mechanicals, if you have the nerve. But I'll assume you'll be using early Ford hydraulics. I have recently gone through this on my late 40's style build `32 chassis. I wanted to retain as much of the stock `32 parts as possible (practical) Using the stock pedals on the "K" member, pushing a push rod to a master cylinder mounted behind the "K" member. you'll have to move the battery over to the right side, or into the trunk (for better exhaust pipe clearance). I allowed my street rodder buddy to convince me to use a modern dual reservoir master cylinder for "saftey". He threatend to not allow me to follow him in traffic if I didn't!
    That was a mistake. It looks like ass and certainly isn't period correct. Next time I will use a stock `39-`48 Ford style single reservoir master cylinder and be able to run 1/4" lines from the master to all 4 wheel cylinders without any residual pressure valves either ( Ford didn't use them). The modern dual res. masters have 3/16" line ports. With the modern dual res. master and reduced down to 3/16" lines I was never able to achieve the high firm pedal like I would expect. Even after numerous attempts at bleeding and adjusting the brakes, I just had to settle for an adequate pedal. The other issue is the stock `32 brake pedal was running into the back of the 59a ( `46-`48) block before it was half way down to the floor board. Rather than hack up a good stock original `32 pedal I would suggest using `33-`34 pedals they are about 1" shorter, will clear the engine, and are a lot ea$ier to come by, or have one laser or plasma cut with the master push arm built onto it. You would have to heat and reshape the `33-`34 pedals to clear the steering column.
     
  7. alchemy
    Joined: Sep 27, 2002
    Posts: 20,522

    alchemy
    Member

    I used a 69 Mustang dual master cylinder and I got a some nuts that would allow the 1/4 lines to fit directly into the master. But, 1/4 or 3/16, the diameter doesn't make a difference on the feel of the brakes. Simple hydraulics.

    Also, simple hydraulics, is that residual pressure valves may be needed even if Henry didn't use them. If your master is lower than your wheel cylinders, they may drain back and give you problems.

    That 1969 master and the new residual valves are the only things newer than 1950 on the car. But that's OK with me.
     
  8. NealinCA
    Joined: Dec 12, 2001
    Posts: 3,155

    NealinCA
    Member

    Same story on my 32 Fordor build. I got the M/C to 1/4" adapters from Speedway. They also had the inverted flare to 1/8" pipe adapters needed for the residual valves. I hit a deadend on these from my local parts store, so had to rely on Speey Bill's emporium.

    Neal
     
  9. Bruce Lancaster
    Joined: Oct 9, 2001
    Posts: 21,681

    Bruce Lancaster
    Member Emeritus

    The '39-48 cylinder has a simple residual pressure check built in.
     
  10. alchemy
    Joined: Sep 27, 2002
    Posts: 20,522

    alchemy
    Member



    I didn't use adapters, I bought the correct nuts from Inline Tube. They look like factory. I think a well-stocked NAPA may have odd size tubing nuts as well.
     
  11. NealinCA
    Joined: Dec 12, 2001
    Posts: 3,155

    NealinCA
    Member

    I had to go back and look. The reason I used the adapters was to get to 1/8" NPT right out of the M/C, then I could go direct to the RV's.

    [​IMG]

    Tough when you get old, can't remember what I did a few months ago...
     
    Last edited: Oct 31, 2014
  12. Bruce Lancaster
    Joined: Oct 9, 2001
    Posts: 21,681

    Bruce Lancaster
    Member Emeritus

  13. alchemy
    Joined: Sep 27, 2002
    Posts: 20,522

    alchemy
    Member

    When you add a master like Nealin pictured, which is how I did mine, the bottom of the master's bracket is still higher than the bottom of the K member. The exhaust under the K is usually lower than the brake components.
     
  14. Hey Neil: I like that battery mount and narrow battery - what brand and part number is the battery - could be a good setup for a lot of tight places. 6V or 12V? I'll be 12V. :)
     
  15. NealinCA
    Joined: Dec 12, 2001
    Posts: 3,155

    NealinCA
    Member

    It's a 12V Dyna-Batt, more info here...

    http://performancedistributors.com/product/dyna-batt/

    And here is another pic of the battery mount...

    [​IMG]

    Neal
     
  16. banjorear
    Joined: Jul 30, 2004
    Posts: 4,485

    banjorear
    Member

  17. NealinCA
    Joined: Dec 12, 2001
    Posts: 3,155

    NealinCA
    Member

    No, it's mild steel. That pic was when it had just been blasted.
     
  18. Nice work my friend!
     
  19. 31pickemup
    Joined: Apr 9, 2006
    Posts: 1,295

    31pickemup
    Member

    Man lots of good advice. Trying to keep track of everything is a chore in itself. I'll be posting some updates soon. Anybody have a recommendation on a good place for top irons? I'm having a hard time finding originals
     
  20. Bruce Lancaster
    Joined: Oct 9, 2001
    Posts: 21,681

    Bruce Lancaster
    Member Emeritus

    Hang out with streetrodders. Most of them would MUCH rather buy something from vintique than clean up a nasty old thing. This often applies to every bit of the car! The ideal seems to be to own an old car with nothing old or even anything that left detroit on a car in it...
    Also, keep your eyes on the HAMB classifieds. More old Ford stuff in there than in most other venues.
     
    RICH B likes this.
  21. 31pickemup
    Joined: Apr 9, 2006
    Posts: 1,295

    31pickemup
    Member

    Well i'm kind tore on what motor to build. I found a stock rebuilt 1940 engine for a right price or build my 53 Mercury. I'm not sure i'f I can handle a stock motor lol
     
  22. 31pickemup
    Joined: Apr 9, 2006
    Posts: 1,295

    31pickemup
    Member

    Ok picked up a nice used 25 louver hood today. Who out there makes the correct hood latches, hood stops, and hood supports. I really don't want polished stainless pieces. I want what they originally used
     
  23. all4sho
    Joined: Jul 20, 2013
    Posts: 26

    all4sho
    Member
    from Byron,GA

    nice project
     
  24. StrickV8
    Joined: Dec 20, 2005
    Posts: 1,148

    StrickV8
    Member

    I've got a few sets of already notched (for the fan belt) original 32 V8 motor mounts, so keep this in mind before you think about notching yours and losing the value.
     

Share This Page

Register now to get rid of these ads!

Archive

Copyright © 1995-2021 The Jalopy Journal: Steal our stuff, we'll kick your teeth in. Terms of Service. Privacy Policy.

Atomic Industry
Forum software by XenForo™ ©2010-2014 XenForo Ltd.