Register now to get rid of these ads!

Camel Hump Heads.

Discussion in 'The Hokey Ass Message Board' started by FWilliams, Jul 11, 2006.

  1. Roothawg
    Joined: Mar 14, 2001
    Posts: 24,589

    Roothawg
    Member

  2. FWilliams
    Joined: Apr 24, 2001
    Posts: 1,986

    FWilliams
    Member

     
  3. FWilliams
    Joined: Apr 24, 2001
    Posts: 1,986

    FWilliams
    Member


    Root is right they will drop your compression ratio...but also the larger valve will hit the cylinder wall unless you relieve it
     
  4. Roothawg
    Joined: Mar 14, 2001
    Posts: 24,589

    Roothawg
    Member

    Fred, do you mind explaining shrouding and how to remedy this?
     
  5. FWilliams
    Joined: Apr 24, 2001
    Posts: 1,986

    FWilliams
    Member


    whats the rest of the number before it. there was a 046, but it was used on the 265
     
  6. FWilliams
    Joined: Apr 24, 2001
    Posts: 1,986

    FWilliams
    Member



    i have only actually seen 3 pair of the 461x heads, and of those 3, only one had not been ported to hell...the best I could find was that the intake runner was a tad bit larger maybe 170-175 instead of the usual 160...and the x came directly after the casting number, not some where else on the head. I have guys try to sell me 461's that are supposed to be the x version because thay have an x on the head somewhere else. these all had 461X
     
  7. sodbuster
    Joined: Oct 15, 2001
    Posts: 5,039

    sodbuster
    Member
    from Kansas

    Lots of great info here.........I think I need an asprin.........Thanks Fred, I have a line on a set of head this weekend and I will check out your specs. on them.......

    Chris Nelson
    Kansas
     
  8. Aman
    Joined: Dec 28, 2005
    Posts: 2,522

    Aman
    Member
    from Texas

    Racefab thanks for the article. It's better than any magazine I've picked up lately. I have a couple questions if you don't mind. 1) Over the years, I've seen heads with humps and with triangles. Singles and doubles. Are they the same or is there a secret code there somewhere? 2) These heads you show, are they for early model V-8s without the mounting holes or for the later model heads. I have a 77 model 350 4 bolt main block I need a good set of heads for and was wondering if these will work. I prefer the mounting holes. 3) How much performance gain will I see with these heads over the 1.94's for a street driven model A. Thanks again, and I appreciate any input you may offer.
     
  9. repoman
    Joined: Jan 2, 2005
    Posts: 1,276

    repoman
    Member

    Not hard to find at all. Just call Repoman.

    I have dozens of these. I have a for-sale ad in the classifieds. Mostly cores.

    This week I'll start picking out the best and posting ads one at a time for sets.

    I'll start with the ready-to-run heads.
     
  10. squirrel
    Joined: Sep 23, 2004
    Posts: 56,077

    squirrel
    Member

    The bracket holes became standard on the 1969 models, when they went to the long water pump. Some (very few) earlier heads had them....I have a pair of stagger bolt powerpacks with the holes!

    A triangle is a power pack head, small ports, small valves (1.72/1.50), closed chamber heads. Double humps are the big valve, big port, closed chamber heads.
     
  11. rustfarmer
    Joined: Sep 25, 2005
    Posts: 160

    rustfarmer
    Member
    from Hawaii

    Racefab,
    Awesome tech!!! Any guidance on prices? I know alot depends on condition and whats been done to it etc. They show up in the classifieds in Hawaii every now and again. The latest was with 202's for $500. I have spent way too much for parts before mostly because of my lack of knowledge -which is basically lack of bargaining power. Any advice on what to look for and ballpark prices?

    By the way thank you for your posts!

    aloha,
    rustfarmer
     
  12. FWilliams
    Joined: Apr 24, 2001
    Posts: 1,986

    FWilliams
    Member

    basically the edge of the valve is extremley close to the combustion chamber wall, the intake charge is restricted and cannot flow around the head of the valve. by machining the combustion chamber wall away from the valve .,..you open up some area for the intake charge to flow...this is a VERY basic explanation


    here you can see the shiny area where the chamber wall has been machined away


    camel hump 046.jpg
     
    Deuces likes this.
  13. FWilliams
    Joined: Apr 24, 2001
    Posts: 1,986

    FWilliams
    Member

    many e mails on the difference between the 461 and the 462


    the 461 was the original camel hump, it had a spark plug location very close to the edge of the combustion chamber....also the combustion chamber had a little different shape than the D shape of the 462


    the 462 and pretty much all the following camel hump heads had the D shaped chamber, and the spark plug location was moved with a large quench pad adjacent to it....these are the heads to use if you are going to run domed pistons, the 461's usually have some interference with domes and spark plugs.




    461

    camel hump 003.jpg




    462


    camel hump 004.jpg
     
    Deuces likes this.
  14. Roothawg
    Joined: Mar 14, 2001
    Posts: 24,589

    Roothawg
    Member

    Thanks Fred. Can you do this with a rotary file or does it need to be done with some kinda accuracy?
     
  15. sodas38
    Joined: Sep 17, 2004
    Posts: 2,412

    sodas38
    Member

    Excellent, excellent post! For someone who has a beginners edge on sbc heads (me), you have helped me understand things in a very straight forward way. Use of pictures, two thumbs up!! Thanks for the info.
     
  16. FWilliams
    Joined: Apr 24, 2001
    Posts: 1,986

    FWilliams
    Member


    if you machine out the same amount you will keep the chamber sizes even...you could do it with a rotary file ....but I woud keep checking the combustion chamber volume and try to keep everything even...or as close as possible



    Fred
     
    Deuces likes this.
  17. I have a 3 different sets of these heads, I keep hearing about a ghost....... 461-X head, is ther any truth to this #, I am negociating with someone now who claims to have a set of these in storage...no harm in looking I suppose...any introspect would be welcome...
     
  18. 32chevysedan
    Joined: Jun 11, 2006
    Posts: 377

    32chevysedan
    Member
    from Texas

    You can get "Lead Additive" at your local parts house, I know that Autozone has it for like $4 a can. Its in a red metal can with silver and black writing on it, lead additive is the actual name for it also(not STP, Lucas, Slick 50). Its located with all the gas additives. By the way double humps do rock...............my 2 cents
     
  19. 32chevysedan
    Joined: Jun 11, 2006
    Posts: 377

    32chevysedan
    Member
    from Texas

    Like said in a previous post 461X heads flow a little more than the originals, they are also twice as hard to find these heads were only available from 60-63 and are 172cc intake runners with 62cc combustion chambers instead of the original 64cc. Another great factory head is the 041 or 041X, these are the exact same casting(intake runners and combustion chamber design) as your double humps but have a right angle triangle instead of the camel humps. The X means the same here that it flows better. Just my 2 cents...........
     
  20. Flathead Youngin'
    Joined: Jan 10, 2005
    Posts: 3,662

    Flathead Youngin'
    Member

    How did I miss this!!! Oh, I was out of town.....now I know why I tell my wife "I don't like to go on vacation!"

    Thanks, FAB, this is just what I wanted to know for my next build. The next project is going to have Chevy's best screamer in it....

    ......too cool!

    ....I bought some books on building the SBC and SBC parts interchange books....this stuff, here, is golden in comparrison!
     
    Deuces likes this.
  21. ShakeyPuddin55
    Joined: Dec 22, 2004
    Posts: 1,906

    ShakeyPuddin55
    Member

    Doing some research since I just picked up a complete running 327. I'm digging this thread up since I have a couple of questions.

    The engine block decoded as a 1969 full size car 327. What size journals does it have? 2.3", 2.45" ?

    I also have the 462 Camel Hump heads with a J66 date code. Withouut pulling the heads, is there a way to tell if I have the 2.02 or 1.94 intake valves? Didn't the double humps with the 1.94 valves show up on the 300HP motors?

    Thanks
     
  22. squirrel
    Joined: Sep 23, 2004
    Posts: 56,077

    squirrel
    Member

    69 is large journal

    the camel hump 1.94 heads were most common...yeah, they were on the 300 hp motors

    as usual, you have to pull the heads to see what you really have, a lot has happened to many pairs of heads over the past 40 years
     
  23. transam_outlaw
    Joined: Apr 25, 2007
    Posts: 1

    transam_outlaw
    Member

    Great info RACEFAB! probably the most i've found on the net. thanks to google i guess for finding it. and now, the huge question that i can't find the answer for....
    I plan on putting douple humps on a 350 im building for my 86 trans am. The heads do not have the accessory holes in them( i think they are from '64, #462 2.02 1.60). Now, how do I use these heads and still mount all of my accesories(excluding ac) in the factory setup? Ive found some brackets in jegs, but i'm not positive they will work as theyre descriptions are vague. Any ideas? I cant be the only one that has wanted to do this. Thanks!
     
  24. Flathead Youngin'
    Joined: Jan 10, 2005
    Posts: 3,662

    Flathead Youngin'
    Member

    :eek::eek::eek:

    Bueler, bueler......anyone?

    actually a good question, though


    EDIT: I forgot the ubiquitous photo....
     

    Attached Files:

  25. BriggsBodied28
    Joined: May 13, 2006
    Posts: 88

    BriggsBodied28
    Member

    Great post RACEFAB. I'm left with a question though. In referencing both the larger 2.02" intakes, and the larger runner area of the 461x, you've stated that they "flow better." This may confuse some folks into thinking that bigger is always better. In this case, bigger usually equates to a significant loss of port velocity throughout the majority of the powerband until the revs really get up high.
     
  26. FWilliams
    Joined: Apr 24, 2001
    Posts: 1,986

    FWilliams
    Member


    mmmm, havent seen this thread in a while, will have to go back and read thru, but I dont think I said that the 461x's "flowed" better... I think i said they have more runner volume....170 to 175 cc on the ones I have cc'd compared to the 160cc of the stock 461



    I also touched on how a smaller 1.94 valve could actually outflow a shrouded 2.02
     
  27. Shaggy
    Joined: Mar 6, 2003
    Posts: 5,207

    Shaggy
    Member
    from Sultan, WA

     
  28. ShakeyPuddin55
    Joined: Dec 22, 2004
    Posts: 1,906

    ShakeyPuddin55
    Member

    Not according to the Mortec website. But I guess it could be wrong. I dont really know or care......
     
  29. tomslik
    Joined: Mar 3, 2001
    Posts: 2,161

    tomslik
    Member

    nope, mortec's right.
    69 was the last year for 327's.
    pickups,fullsize and camaros had 'em
     
    Deuces likes this.
  30. CaddyRat
    Joined: Jan 7, 2005
    Posts: 578

    CaddyRat
    Member

    Anything on 040 Heads??
     

Share This Page

Register now to get rid of these ads!

Archive

Copyright © 1995-2021 The Jalopy Journal: Steal our stuff, we'll kick your teeth in. Terms of Service. Privacy Policy.

Atomic Industry
Forum software by XenForo™ ©2010-2014 XenForo Ltd.