View Full Version : At what point does performance hinder driveability?
Roothawg
07-24-2004, 05:06 PM
Just wondering how far a guy should take it when building a street motor? I want a driver but my hotrod roots tend to have me gravitate to the performance section rather than the pretty stuff. The "need for speed" sometimes renders a car useless for long cruises. Where does a guy stop?
Roothawg
07-24-2004, 05:33 PM
At least humor me and act like you care..... http://www.jalopyjournal.com/ubbthreads/images/graemlins/smirk.gif
zonkola
07-24-2004, 05:49 PM
I think some guys play the numbers game--if they can't say the engine makes 450+ horsepower then it doesn't turn them on. Fact is, you can build a steel highboy roadster that weighs around 2,200 pounds or so. A 200 hp engine (with appropriate gearing, of course) will feel reasonably zippy in such a light car, and a 300hp engine will feel pretty damn fast.
As an example, a 300hp engine in a 2200lb car has a 7.34:1 weight-to-power ratio, which puts it in Ferrari/Dodge Viper/high-end Porsche territory--cars that have been tested in the 12 second range in the quarter mile. And these days it's just not that hard or expensive to build a rock solid reliable, daily driver 300hp small block engine.
Every time I see a stripped-down T-bucket with a blown big block in it I wonder if the driving experience is any fun at all.
I'd say if it won't idle without goosing the gas regularly at a stop or idles so high rpm it won't let a (automatic) trans down shift into low, (early Olds Hydros are like that, they idle at 365 rpm stock, no shit) it's too hairy.
I'd also say if the cam "requires" a higher than stock stall torque converter then it's reaching into the drivability by just being inefficient for anything but WFOT acceleration.
Also if the engine needs high rear gears to come into it's power range, but is running over, say, 3500 rpm at "Highway speed" it's gonna wear out a lot sooner and drive you deaf a lot sooner than if it runs 2800 rpm at "highway speed"
Another thing is if you have a light car, skinny ass tires and a lot of torque with a "sticky" clutch, it's gonna be a bear to take off from a light with out worrying about "Exhibition of speed, spinning tires." citations. That's why quick changes were made....highway gear/hotrod gear http://www.jalopyjournal.com/ubbthreads/images/graemlins/cool.gif
To my reconing the best you can do is have a car that can put the power to the road without losing too much traction on acceleration.If you have far more power than the car can put to the road whats the point.On real high tune cars the tickover is lumpy,fuel bills are over the top and slow speeds are just a plain pain.As long as you have enough power to shovel you up to high speeds in warp factor 10 there aint no point in having power over that unless you boast a lot to ya buddies...............Marq
Roothawg
07-24-2004, 06:03 PM
Ya see , this kinda all stems from a desire to have a blown sbc in my 36. I have a buddy that lives down the road and he runs a 454 with an 8-71 BDS and a full blown cage etc.
He can't run with us to say...the HAMB drags. He would hafta trailer it and pull it behind his 02 Tahoe. Not much fun, huh? But......that thing is a hoot at WOT. Gives me a stiffy. I hafta keep reeling myself back in.....trying to convince myself that I don't need a blower on the street.
The other thing is the "look" that a 6-71 gives to an otherwise somewhat run of the mill SBC. In Hop Up issue 2,pg 20-23 there's a deuce sedan with the setup I am talking about. It changes the whole look of the car.
I dunno......I talk myself into and out of this all the time. Just ask Rashy.
metalshapes
07-24-2004, 06:08 PM
At first I wasn't really sure where you were going with that question.
Sort of like somebody asks " How much does it hurt?" After you hit your thumb with a hammer, Ohh.. about 63%.... http://www.jalopyjournal.com/ubbthreads/images/graemlins/grin.gif
I guess performance hinders driveablity as soon as you cant toss your car keys to a non car person without a long list of the things they have to do, or cant do.
But we will put up with a lot more... http://www.jalopyjournal.com/ubbthreads/images/graemlins/grin.gif http://www.jalopyjournal.com/ubbthreads/images/graemlins/grin.gif
Roothawg
07-24-2004, 06:11 PM
Good point.......not that I would ever do that(hand a non-car person my keys) but...good point. http://www.jalopyjournal.com/ubbthreads/images/graemlins/smirk.gif
I'll use my wife for that. She has been around hot rods since we met but she has no idea how to feather the throttle to keep one running while holding tha same foot on the brake pad. http://www.jalopyjournal.com/ubbthreads/images/graemlins/smirk.gif
They ut blowers in Lincolns for the street...
it's not the fact that it's got a blower, it's the whole package, rear gears etc are important to driveability...
Big Don Palfreyman got way good mileage in the Egorama, better than Samiyam did and Don Palfreyman's got a blower in his '34 Ford
A32Flathead
07-24-2004, 06:22 PM
712 ci....plus Nitrous....and a Lenco....and a spool....
Guy drives it on the street....sometimes!
McGrath
07-24-2004, 07:05 PM
I have a friend that runs a 6-71 on a 383 chevy. He underdrives it most of the time, so it is pretty "driveable", yet still has the badassed look.
Boones
07-24-2004, 07:15 PM
I think HP is good and the more the better.. BUT... To be a good drive, it has to be realible, can run on pump gas (and not ping), not overheat in traffic or run at such a high RPM on the freeway that it worries you (even a little bit). Basically, you would get in it and drive it anywhere, anytime.. So build that blower motor but keep the boost down and the cam within reason, and either use a overdrive or reasonable rear gears. Blowers are bitchin
CURIOUS RASH
07-24-2004, 07:27 PM
<font color="green">Root,
Mine, for all that it is, is teetering on the fence of being a pain in the ass to drive a long distance.
Ok, it IS a pain in the ass to drive a long distance, trying not to sound like a puss.
I don't think I will ever get used to the lumpy idle.
HankCash sure seemed to enjoy it though!!
Hell, I even let the Monkey man drive it a while back.
RASHY </font>
30tudor
07-24-2004, 07:35 PM
How do you define driveability? If rumbuling around town a couple of days a week and going to the drags is it, I say the more (hp) the merrier. On the other hand if you're useing it as a daily driver or takeing road trips up and down the highway very often perhaps a little milder tune up is in order.
Roothawg
07-24-2004, 07:38 PM
I'll tell ya kinda what I wanna do.....
I wanna road trip this thing like crazy, but I can't stomach the thought of a stock motor. http://www.jalopyjournal.com/ubbthreads/images/graemlins/crazy.gif
Phil1934
07-24-2004, 07:48 PM
Some of the problems I've had in just one car. I had an old Mopar with a high stall convertor and L60's. There was a hill next to the police station leaving the junior college. I tried to ease it, but on rainy days I could not get up this hill without drying it. I shopped for tires based on which were quieter when spinning. It also overheated in traffic as I did not swap the 383 radiator for a 440 one when I did the engine. It pinged with 10:1 and even water injection only partly solved it. I fiddled with timing as the weather changed. And you could not punch it other than pointed straight ahead or you were just racing the rear of the car to see who was first. Was it too much? Yes. Would I do it again? I'm doing it on three now as my last hurrah of car building. Power to weight is 8#/HP for the dual quad big block '39, 7:1 for the 4-2bbl V8 260Z and 5:1 for a blown EFI'ed Model Y. All 3 will run M/T's.http://www.jalopyjournal.com/ubbthreads/images/graemlins/grin.gifYou don't want to look back and say I shoulda...
30tudor
07-24-2004, 08:06 PM
I can't live with a stock motor either. My driver tudor runs some head work, a mild cam and three 94's. Goes down the road on one carb but thank god for progressive linkage.
Roothawg
07-24-2004, 08:10 PM
I tend to build what I have. I can't stand 350's. Just a pet peeve of mine. Not that they are bad...just not for me.
Here's what I have: a freshly bored 327 small journal with a bad crank. A 283 with a good steel crank but the block needs to be bored.......see where this is going?
flamedabone
07-24-2004, 08:31 PM
Outstanding question, Root. This is kind of a touchy subject with me....
If you can't drive it to work everyday, then jump in it and do a 2500 mile round trip to the HAMB Drags, IT AIN'T A FUCKIN STREET CAR!!!!!!
-Abone.
Roothawg
07-24-2004, 08:54 PM
The buddy of mine with the blown 454 says....it's a race car if you can't run it on pump gas.
it has to be looked at as a total package
and weighed against your own threshold of pain
the total package being the cars ability to behave well in traffic and the long haul,
and you have to be physicaly ready to handle the strain (pain).
with the right ergonomics and a good ballance of power and overall performance I would say there is potential for a car that could be driven to work one day, haul ass for fifteen hours straight the next, do two hundred at Boneville and drive home.
my car can haul ass but as for the rest of that.. nope never will.
I would bet you could go out and buy a car for only a few hundred thou that could though.
Paul
Roothawg
07-24-2004, 09:04 PM
Paul, I kinda wondered about your car when typing this...I have been watching you build it and figured you would have some input....
Where is Racefab when you need sarcasm?(inside joke)
probably the biggest hassle is having to repack the 'chute at every stoplight. http://www.jalopyjournal.com/ubbthreads/images/graemlins/tongue.gif
FWilliams
07-24-2004, 09:36 PM
[ QUOTE ]
Where is Racefab when you need sarcasm
[/ QUOTE ]
at a funeral..................
Slag Kustom
07-24-2004, 10:00 PM
my 64 corvette convert sux cause i fell into the bigger badder engine game. too big of a cam too much compression too many cui
i can only drive it 60 miles on 16 gallons of gas,motor turns 3000 rpm on the highway .
any trip over 25 miles becomes no fun. you cant here yourself think and its tough to get race fuel any where.
Chris, you can have your hot rod and drive it.
First, there are plenty of cars with blowers in our locality that are driven..
Three come to mind, Darrel Scribners 41 chevy truck. he has a warmed over 350/700R4 and a Wiend blower.
Jim Goucher has a little 70 Nova with a pretty hot 350 and TH350 with high stall converter and Wiend Blower coumplimented with a 200hp NOS.
These cars may be driven from here to MCallister, Ok, Ureaka Springs, Ark, or any other such place on any given saturday and to the local cruise that night.
Ask Carl Blanton about Gouchers Blue Nova.
Jum raced the car at MOKAN for lotsa seasons.
Jim also worked at the track for a while.
Ike Woodrow is another blower driven guy.
His is in a 73 Chevy short wide bed.
All three of these cars are 10 second cars with out the bottle.
With the bottle, Gouchers Nova has ran mid 9's
All three will tell you that after you drive a car with a blower, you wont drive one without.
The point is, you can have a streetable, drivable hot rod that will scorch the tires at the stop light or at the "TREE"
I think the key is pump gas and highway rear gears.
AnimalAin
07-24-2004, 10:08 PM
I think there are two items of modern technology that can make this compromise work well.
First, use a modern transmission with an overdrive high gear. With an aggressive rear gear, it gives you plenty of gear (and dig) in the lower gears, without buzzing your motor on the highway.
Second, use a modern roller cam. My coupe has a hydraulic roller with short events, but over .500 lift. It has an idle only a little zoomier than a stocker, a very impressive midrange, and good hp approaching the redline.
I understand that your preferred motor is a small block with great throttle response and high rev limit, and this cam might not exactly fit into that mold. You should at least consider it, though, if the goal is to have a car that is no-kidding streetable and at least respectably quick.
I hear ya on the 350, Root, although I've built a couple of 355s that I enjoyed very much.
It appears that you have a 302 in mind, and I can think of only one more-interesting and streetable SBC, and that's a SJ 327 -- full stroke; the 302 is very excitable when built as it should be. The longer stroke of the 327 will be greatly appreciated in the day-to-day real world, and you'll hardly miss the 302's extra Rs when you stretch your properly built 327 all the way out and listen to it howl. Return to basics and fit it with solid lifters and an appropriate cam and springs and you won't be disappointed.
It seems a shame to mask that beautiful 327 intake howl with a big lump of an air pump. Holley still makes their bitchin' DZ-style Z28 manifold which willingly accepts the 4150 DP of your choice, available in flow increments of 50 cfm, from 600 to 850.
Forget about converter stall speeds and lockup and all that silliness, and just mate the motor to a stout manual five-speed with a diaphragm clutch and then select your final-drive ratio accordingly.
You won't miss a lick and won't be embarrassed on the street or elsewhere. http://www.jalopyjournal.com/ubbthreads/images/graemlins/grin.gif
Morrisman
07-24-2004, 10:14 PM
"There's no replacement for displacement"
Personally, I'd go for something with biiig cubes, running a reasonably mild tune, then you've got masses of power and torque, it'll run all day in traffic, and it'll look the part when you're all pulled over and bullshitting with the boys. Big block Chevy/Ford/Mopar whatever, with ally heads to keep the weight down?
If gas wasn't $6 a gallon I'd build one myself over this side of the pond http://www.jalopyjournal.com/ubbthreads/images/graemlins/frown.gif
With the overdrive transmissions available today, highway gears are no longer a problem. The trouble with most rodders is that they don't look at the whole package, and make the various parts work together - which will give you a high 10/low 11 sec. car with street manners.
I'm trying to do that with my gasser that I'm building. Due to physical limitations I had to forgo my roadster, and think about a car with more room, and a roof.
I have a blower, a 406, 4.11 rear gears and shifts is building me a 700r4. It should, if my calculations are correct, allow me to run 10s, cruise at about 2600 rpm on the highway, and get fair mileage.
With the roll down back window and push out windshield, I'll have old style air conditioning. And the A100 seats should provide support for a bad back. And I'll have a coupe with a full hood, for the second time in my life.
Mutt
Roothawg
07-24-2004, 10:16 PM
[ QUOTE ]
Forget about converter stall speeds and lockup and all that silliness, and just mate the motor to a stout manual five-speed with a diaphragm clutch and then select your final-drive ratio accordingly.
You won't miss a lick and won't be embarrassed on the street or elsewhere. http://www.jalopyjournal.com/ubbthreads/images/graemlins/grin.gif
[/ QUOTE ]
Have you been reading my mail?
I actually have been looking for a small journal 327 crank(preferred) but they are starting to dry up. If you do find one they are either 500 miles away and freight would eat my lunch or they think they have a "collectors item".
I want a 6" rod 327. That's what I am searching for. I would like to save the 283 for my son's 36.
HotRod31
07-24-2004, 10:22 PM
[ QUOTE ]
If you can't drive it to work everyday, then jump in it and do a 2500 mile round trip to the HAMB Drags, IT AIN'T A FUCKIN STREET CAR!!!!!!
-Abone.
[/ QUOTE ]
Amen Brother.
Later, Mark
Upchuck
07-24-2004, 10:45 PM
"At what point does performance hinder driveability?"
as soon as I start to second guess if its gonna be reliable or not
A few years ago, a buddy of mine built a 79 camaro up with a 327. It had an extremely rowdy cam, highrise with a 850DP, 3000rpm stall on a TH350, and 4.11 rear. Should have been a "fun" car, but it was just a pain in the ass. It wouldn't idle for a damn... when the doors were open, at the end of the door it would shake up and down about 6".. it constantly shook things loose. It had too much stall to use on the typically 45mph streets too. He and another buddy were drunk and had it out on a side street, and neutral dropped it, and blew the friggin valve body out of the trans pan. Bent a couple of valves too. No big loss, he traded the parts off for other parts.
Anyhow, the moral of the story is that my friends are dumbasses. And I agree that more displacement is better, but even that has a point. I was reading at the caddy 500 forum about some kid with a 82 Cutlass with a caddy 500. He was getting pissed with the car because he couldn't get any traction... it would just smoke the tires at every take off. Some people you just can't please... http://www.jalopyjournal.com/ubbthreads/images/graemlins/tongue.gif
Fat Hack
07-25-2004, 05:49 PM
You wanna run a blown SBC on the street and be able to drive it anywhere?
Not impossible...
The key to making big power with a supercharged engine is to start with a LOW static compression ratio and use the blower to pack it in and stuff the cylinders! To a lesser extent, this can help you out with your street blower motor, too.
By building your engine with dedicated "blower pistons" in it, and large chamber heads, your static compression ration can be as lows as 6 or 7 to 1 if you wanna make it that way. Doing so will allow you to run a moderate amount of boost (maybe 3-6psi) and still be within the realm of pump gas.
By contrast, if you start off with a 9:1 engine...or even an 8:1 engine...a few pounds of boost will put you into racing gas territory.
To make a blown engine live a good long time on the street, I'd lean towards having it O-ringed, run forged blower pistons with a substantial "dish", make sure the combustion chambers are smooth and free of any edges that may create 'hot spots' and induce detonation, and run a 'blower cam' designed for your application.
In addition, a heavy duty cooling system should be a priority, too...blower motors make HEAT...and you want to be able to drive this thing on the street without worry...keeping it cool will go a long way towards that goal!
Like any other engine...carefull assembly and attention to detail are required, tuning is ultra critical, and you'll need to run premium unleaded pump gas...but the notion of making a 6-71 huffed small block docile enough to drive anywhere, yet still potent enough to be fun isn't THAT outrageous...especially with today's technology and parts availability. Go for it!
(You can always switch pulleys and up the boost when MORE power is desired...making a blown engine a pretty versitile performance package if you plan it right!)
CURIOUS RASH
07-25-2004, 06:12 PM
[ QUOTE ]
You wanna run a blown SBC on the street and be able to drive it anywhere?
Not impossible...
The key to making big power with a supercharged engine is to start with a LOW static compression ratio and use the blower to pack it in and stuff the cylinders! To a lesser extent, this can help you out with your street blower motor, too.
By building your engine with dedicated "blower pistons" in it, and large chamber heads, your static compression ration can be as lows as 6 or 7 to 1 if you wanna make it that way. Doing so will allow you to run a moderate amount of boost (maybe 3-6psi) and still be within the realm of pump gas.
By contrast, if you start off with a 9:1 engine...or even an 8:1 engine...a few pounds of boost will put you into racing gas territory.
To make a blown engine live a good long time on the street, I'd lean towards having it O-ringed, run forged blower pistons with a substantial "dish", make sure the combustion chambers are smooth and free of any edges that may create 'hot spots' and induce detonation, and run a 'blower cam' designed for your application.
In addition, a heavy duty cooling system should be a priority, too...blower motors make HEAT...and you want to be able to drive this thing on the street without worry...keeping it cool will go a long way towards that goal!
Like any other engine...carefull assembly and attention to detail are required, tuning is ultra critical, and you'll need to run premium unleaded pump gas...but the notion of making a 6-71 huffed small block docile enough to drive anywhere, yet still potent enough to be fun isn't THAT outrageous...especially with today's technology and parts availability. Go for it!
(You can always switch pulleys and up the boost when MORE power is desired...making a blown engine a pretty versitile performance package if you plan it right!)
[/ QUOTE ] <font color="green">ALL RIGHT!!!
You wait one damn minute.....WHOEVER YOU ARE!!!
What have you done with the REAL "FATHACK."
http://www.jalopyjournal.com/ubbthreads/images/graemlins/grin.gif </font>
Rocknrod
07-25-2004, 11:11 PM
When you step on it at highway speeds and it lays a patch, you've got to much power for the road.
Me, I like the "package" if the numbers count... add a blower. If you want something that "works" get a nice setup that puts out a flat torque band with a reasonable redline. The "package" makes the car! http://www.jalopyjournal.com/ubbthreads/images/graemlins/cool.gif
Root, good post, and some really good thoughts-facts too.
A few thing's i like to keep in mind are,
-Running pump gas..
-running cool, i can't stand worrying about overheating if you have to sit in traffic.
-and a decent streetable gear..ya know, being able to go over 50 if ya want.
The combo i have in my '32 is fairly simple, and VERY drivable..
I too am not really big on 350's, only because they seem to be the ci of choice for so many..i like 283-327's most.
It's a 30 over 283, 8.5:1 comp, larger chamber 'camel hump' heads W/ 1.94-1.6 valves with blending-port-polish work,and a thicker head gasket.
Lunati bracket master cam, 230ish duration @50 thou, and 500 lift ( i built it a while ago and don't remember the actual specs).
Dyers V 6-71 huffer (underdriven), dual carter 500's, tied together not progressive..
Being such a small motor about288ci, and the blower is about300ci, you can underdrive the blower quite a bit and still produce boost..
ie: 12% under on a 355, is going to produce less cylinder pressure than 12% under on a 288..thus, you can spin the blower at say, 18% under on the little motor and get simmilar boost pressure as 12% on the 355..
( this is just a quick example)
Ignition...Gm points dizzy with Pertronics kit and flame thrower coil.
I'm running a 4 speed, and 3.00:1 rear and 30" tall rear tires.
The cooling system is a Walker rad, Stewart high flow wp, Stewart high flow thermostat, and March underdrive (better cooling) pulleys.
It NEVER get's hot..190 is the hottest it ever gotten, and thats cruising around fairgrounds at events.
The high gears/ tall tires effect the low end, off the line power unless you dump the clutch..then it's balls out.
But the way it sits right now, it's plenty fast for the street, and can literally hit the interstate and cruise at 85mph until you run out of gas (about 9 mpg).
We just came back from the Syracuse Nats, and ran 80 the whole way home..about 90 miles non stop.
To *me* it has the in your face look, sound's snotty as hell and has a nice compromise of power and drivability..
I think this is kinda what you were thinking...maybe not http://www.jalopyjournal.com/ubbthreads/images/graemlins/grin.gif
Tony.
Fat Hack
07-26-2004, 12:36 AM
Ha Ha Ha...believe it or not, Rashy...I know small blocks, and messed with them for YEARS...always wanted a 6-71 squeezed mouse motor in something like a 56 Chevy...but could never afford it. Eventually got bored with small block Chevys...but not before I formulated a few build plans...just in case I ever ventured back!
http://www.jalopyjournal.com/ubbthreads/images/graemlins/grin.gif http://www.jalopyjournal.com/ubbthreads/images/graemlins/wink.gif http://www.jalopyjournal.com/ubbthreads/images/graemlins/tongue.gif http://www.jalopyjournal.com/ubbthreads/images/graemlins/cool.gif
A32Flathead
07-26-2004, 01:44 AM
[ QUOTE ]
If gas wasn't $6 a gallon I'd build one myself over this side of the pond http://www.jalopyjournal.com/ubbthreads/images/graemlins/frown.gif
[/ QUOTE ]
It's closer to $9..... http://www.jalopyjournal.com/ubbthreads/images/graemlins/shocked.gif
Dave
hotrodsnguns
07-26-2004, 02:18 AM
I have a 57 Chevy with a bbc 468 alum heads, headers. cam has over .5 lift, everthing has been balanced, ported and matched. Should be a 10 second car best so far 12:17 can not get it to hook up. It is fun to drive on the street for a cruise night, if things go well i will trailer it to the hamb drags. There is no way i would drive it 2000 miles. Tow car 70 chevy pu with a sbc 383 202 heads t5 camaro tranny. it is fun to drive, as is the 57. When deso the 57 become not fun to drive , any time it is over 30 miles. If it were my only hot rod it would be lots milder still a 4sp cause that is the only true hot rod.
38Chevy454
07-26-2004, 03:03 PM
Getting in this late, but I think the line is pump gas and reliable enough that you don't have to do any major tune-up/maintenance to make a 2000 mile trip.
My 38 Chevy has about 450 real hp, as verified by the fact i used to drag race this eaxcat motor to high 10's in a 2800 lb car. It is a flat-top 8.5:1 compression 468 (.060 over 454) with a very big cam (253 degrees at .050 and .575 lift), 700R4 trans, and 3.70 gears. Runs all day long about 2500 rpms at 75 mph, 13 mpg while doing it. Sounds healthy as can be, uses the cheapest regular gas without troubles.
Sure it is not the smoothest engine, it doesn;t even smoothout until about 2500 rpms. But it has the fairgrounds cruise idle that can't be beat, can run anywhere in any temps, and reasonable mileage to boot. It is in my estimation about the edge of real streetability, but of course I am biased and others may feel I am past the edge.
Unkl Ian
07-26-2004, 03:30 PM
38Chevy454 makes a good point.Different people will draw the line in different places.
I would draw the line where I felt the performance gains didn't justify the extra hassle.
AHotRod
07-26-2004, 04:38 PM
Metalshapes " Nailed-It".
When a driver has to be given instructions on how to start-it and keep it running, watch the temp gauge, oh...and the oil pressure gauge,...be sure and slip-it into neutral at the stop-lights.........
We all have been there, or at least with somebody who has.
Yea, it's all cool, but as for real drivers????? ...naw.
AHotRod
Bruce Lancaster
07-26-2004, 04:57 PM
Well, what is it with modern street rods, the main stram magazine type cars, and performance??? I would lump the early NSRA types and the sixties street machine muscle cars together on this. Drive anywhere around a major hot rod event on interstates and the hot rods are BLOCKING TRAFFIC!! This really hit me in the face after York this summer--ALL the rods heading away from the show were running WELL below traffic speeds, with little old ladies in Volvos screaming past. This included radicl blower cartoon cars, cars with stock 2004 Lincoln drive trains, and everything else!! Thousands of rods, probably averaging well over 350 hp each, ALL driving at lower speeds than original early Fords run on the highway.
WTF?? Is anybody building anything driveable? I'm not talking about just adult behavior versus peeling out at every light--I'm talking about an endless line of cars going down the slow lane slower than anyone else out there. Cars running alone as welll as those in convoy. Unanimously. I'm sure none of these people travel the interstates at 57 MPH in their late model--what exactly did they build there rods for?
Scotch
07-26-2004, 07:16 PM
If it's got:
-less than 12 inches of vacuum at idle
-less than 10 gallon fuel capacity
-a 'fuel requirement' beyond pump gas
-more than 3,000 rpm stall speed
-about 5 minutes of life in traffic standing still before it overheats
-a minimal wait after its been turned off before it can be restarted
-more than a 1,000 rpm drop when the trans goes from "P" to "D"
..then it's not a street car...
Scotch~!
Deuce Roadster
07-26-2004, 07:48 PM
[ QUOTE ]
Drive anywhere around a major hot rod event on interstates and the hot rods are BLOCKING TRAFFIC!! This really hit me in the face after York this summer--ALL the rods heading away from the show were running WELL below traffic speeds, I'm sure none of these people travel the interstates at 57 MPH in their late model--what exactly did they build there rods for?
[/ QUOTE ]
I believe that MOST of the cars you mention...............do NOT have a correct speedometer.
So they drive slow.......
A bunch of folks (some HAMBERS too), do not have a clue as how to dial in a speedometer.
http://www.jalopyjournal.com/ubbthreads/images/graemlins/grin.gif
AnimalAin
07-26-2004, 08:19 PM
Some of us know what the left lane is for......
I will second the comment about incorrect speedometers. I have been told over and over about how fast I drive, etc. I control my speed by timing mile markers, and can usually hold speed to within 2 mph or so. The stopwatch doesn't lie..... and 45 seconds a mile is exactly 80 mph. I figure if the other citizens are jamming along at that pace, I should as well.
Roothawg
07-26-2004, 09:36 PM
I found that I LOVE VDO programmable gauges. I have never had much luck swapping cluster gears etc. I always got close but not accurate...so I gave up. Now every freaking hot rod I build will have a VDO speedo. Traditional? No? Dependable? Yes.
vBulletin® v3.8.7, Copyright ©2000-2012, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.